CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 383Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recollective qualities modulate hippocampal activation during autobiographical memory retrieval

Addis, Donna Rose, Moscovitch, Morris, Crawley, Adrian P., McAndrews, Mary Pat·2004·Hippocampus
DOI 10.1002/hipo.10215
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging studies report preferential hippocampal engagement during autobiographical memory (AM) retrieval. Although the basis of this preferential activation remains unclear, it may be related to the temporal specificity, recency, or recollective qualities of AMs, such as detail, emotionality, and personal significance. Typically, however, these variables are confounded, and thus we sought to investigate the contributions of each to hippocampal activation during AM retrieval. We conducted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in which participants retrieved temporally specific AMs and general, repeated AMs, and rated each for level of detail, emotion, or personal significance. These ratings, as well as the recency of AMs, were used in parametric modulation analyses to identify brain regions that correlated positively with ratings, independent of recency, and vice versa. Retrieval of AMs activated a number of regions, including the hippocampus. No differences in hippocampal activation were evident between specific and general AM retrieval, suggesting that temporal specificity, on its own, is not a key modulator of hippocampal activation. Activation of the left hippocampus during specific AM retrieval did vary with the level of detail, personal significance, and at a subthreshold level, emotionality, when the effect of recency was covaried out. Further, during general AM retrieval, all three recollective qualities modulated activity in the right hippocampus. Although the recency of specific AMs modulated hippocampal activation bilaterally, this effect dissipated in the left hippocampus when detail or emotionality was included as a covariate, and was no longer present in either hippocampus when personal significance was taken into account. Our results suggest that recollective qualities are important predictors of hippocampal engagement during AM retrieval independent of factors such as recency. These findings are consistent with theories of hippocampal function that emphasize its role in the recollection of multifaceted autobiographical experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.10215

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cohen J, 1988, Statistic power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  2. Fujii T, 2000, Handbook of neuropsychology, 199
  3. Larsen SF, 1998, Autobiographical memory: theoretical and applied perspectives, 163
  4. Moscovitch M, 1999, Memory, consciousness and the brain: the Tallinn Conference, 331
  5. 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<352::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–383 of 383

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Addis, D. R., Moscovitch, M., Crawley, A. P., & McAndrews, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Addis, Donna Rose
ORCID
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
752-762
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
DOI
10.1002/hipo.10215
OpenAlex
W2139658019
Cited by
383
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 32
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 60 d)
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Surgical Association Foundation
  • Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
autobiographical memory, hippocampal activation, recollection, temporal specificity, recency, level of detail, emotionality, personal meaning, memory retrieval, parametric modulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Time Factors, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review