Foreseeing the future: Occurrence probability of imagined future events modulates hippocampal activation
Abstract
Episodic memory and episodic future thinking are known to share a set of brain regions. Potential differences in activation patterns associated with the two conditions are as yet inconclusive, in particular with respect to hippocampal involvement. Hippocampal activation is modulated by a range of phenomenal qualities during the imagination of both past and future events (Addis et al. (2004) Hippocampus 14:752–762; Addis and Schacter (2008) Hippocampus 18:227–237). A relevant variable in this regard is the occurrence probability of an episode, which varies for future but not past events and thus cannot be equated across conditions. Using parametric modulation analysis, we investigated the effect of occurrence probability of imagined future events on brain activation patterns, while effects of temporal distance, amount of details, and emotionality were controlled for. Activation of right anterior hippocampus increased with decreasing occurrence probability, presumably reflecting higher processing demands during binding of more disparate details for unlikely events. This finding may contribute to the understanding of previously reported inconsistent results concerning hippocampal involvement during the imagination of past and future events. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The anterior hippocampal imagination effect is stronger for specific future simulations, for simulations built de novo, and for especially novel events.
“This effect is more apparent when the future simulations are specific (Addis, Cheng, Roberts, & Schacter, 2011), are constructed de novo (van Mulukom, Schacter, Corballis, & Addis, 2013) and are especially novel (e.g., implausible future events; Weiler, Suchan, & Daum, 2010).”
From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Weiler, Suchan, & Daum, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Weiler, J. A., Suchan, B., & Daum, I.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Weiler, Julia A.
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 685-690
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W2048057792
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- episodic future thinking, episodic memory, probability of occurrence, hippocampal activation, temporal distance, emotionality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review