Cited by 49Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory Processes and Influences

An investigation of the effects of hippocampal lesions in rats on pre‐ and postoperatively acquired spatial memory in a complex environment

Winocur, Gordon, Moscovitch, Morris, Rosenbaum, R. Shayna, Sekeres, Melanie·2010·Hippocampus

Abstract

In previous work, we showed that adult rats that were reared socially for 3 months in a complex (village) environment retained allocentric spatial memory for that environment following hippocampal lesions (Winocur et al., ( 2005 ) Nat Neurosci 8:273–275). In the present series of experiments, we showed that 3 months of postoperative rearing did not confer the same benefits (Experiment 1), although hippocampal groups, with or without rearing experience, exhibited spatial learning after extensive training (Experiments 1 and 2). Experiment 3 showed that as little as 2 weeks of preoperative rearing in the village was sufficient to retain acquired spatial memories after hippocampal lesions. Probe testing revealed that, although rats with hippocampal lesions exhibited remarkably good memory for preoperatively learned locations in the village, they were impaired when changes in task demands required flexible use of existing spatial representations. In a direct test of flexibility (Experiment 4), preoperatively reared rats were administered a blocked‐routes task in the original learning environment, in which on designated trials, a barrier was placed across one of the direct paths to the goal compartment. On encountering the barrier, control rats consistently selected the next most direct route, whereas rats with hippocampal lesions, despite using spatial strategies, made more errors and took longer to find the goal. The present results confirm that allocentric spatial memories can survive hippocampal damage but they are schematic in nature and less cohesive than those associated with cognitive maps in intact brains. As well, there was evidence that, although different processes are involved in their formation, the schematic memories that were acquired preoperatively and survived hippocampal lesions are essentially the same as those laboriously formed postoperatively after extensive training. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20721

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rodents with HPC lesions and extensive pre-lesion experience in an environment are able to use the overall layout of the learned environment, or its spatial gist.

    “This ditinction is similar to that found in rodents with HPC lesions and extensive pre-lesion experience in an environment: they are able to use the overall layout of the learned environment, or its spatial gist, and take detours to reach goal locations, although often not the most optimal ones 70,125,126 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [125]

  • Rodents with HPC lesions and extensive pre-lesion experience take detours to reach goal locations, although often not the most optimal ones.

    “they are able to use the overall layout of the learned environment, or its spatial gist, and take detours to reach goal locations, although often not the most optimal ones 70,125,126 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 49

Authors
Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S., & Sekeres, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Winocur, Gordon
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-24
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
1350-1365
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1979248527
Cited by
49
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Trent University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (181165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampal lesions, allocentric spatial memory, spatial learning, cognitive maps, complex environments, spatial flexibility, rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Environment, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review