The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuronal activity in the hippocampus during delayed non‐match to sample performance in rats: Evidence for hippocampal processing in recognition memory
Abstract
Neuronal activity in the CA1 of rats was explored with regard to functional correlates of performance in an odor‐guided continuous delayed non‐match to sample task. Although different CA1 cells fired in association with each identifiable trial event, these analyses focused on cells that fired selectively during the period of odor cue sampling and response generation. The firing patterns of many of these cells reflected the match or non‐match comparison between current and previous odor cues independent of the particular stimuli that composed those comparisons. Such cells were more prevalent in sessions when performance was highly accurate. Hippocampal cells did not demonstrate stimulus‐evoked firing that persisted through the memory delay, nor did they fire differentially to session‐novel vs. repeated odor presentations. These results suggest that the hippocampus contributes to recognition memory by processing comparisons between current information and representations of previous stimuli stored in parahippocampal and neocortical structures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“evidence suggests that place cell activity in rats can also encode information about the ‘what’ (e.g. odours and their status, i.e. match/non-match [124–126]) and ‘when’ (i.e. elapsed time [127,128]) of events.”
From Is episodic-like memory like episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
Citations
Cites
(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · Cited by 7,322
The hippocampus as a cognitive map
Passingham, R. E. (1979) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(79)90015-0 · Cited by 5,128
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: A review of anatomical data
Amaral, D. G., & Witter, M. P. (1989) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(89)90424-7 · Cited by 2,180
The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells
Muller, R., & Kubie, J. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-07-01951.1987 · Cited by 1,581
Studies on single neurons in dorsal hippocampal formation and septum in unrestrained rats
Ranck, J. B. (1973) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(73)90290-2 · Cited by 1,322
Mishkin, M. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273297a0 · Cited by 1,196
Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.
Berg, H. (1989) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)87283-3 · Cited by 1,152
Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: Why they fire where they fire
O'Keefe, J. M., & Conway, D. H. (1978) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00239813 · Cited by 1,028
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory
Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 · Cited by 2,580
Self-citationTwo functional components of the hippocampal memory system
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035391 · Cited by 1,114
Self-citationThe Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells
Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M., & Tanila, H. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80773-4 · Cited by 1,064
Self-citationRecognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective
Squire, L. R., Wixted, J. T., & Clark, R. E. (2007) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2154 · Cited by 1,059
Hasselmo, M. E., Bodelón, C., & Wyble, B. P. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602317318965 · Cited by 875
“Units have been shown to be selective for the receipt of reward at a particular location (Wiener et al., 1989), and rewarddependent responses have been shown in both region CA1 (Otto & Eichenbaum , 1992) and entorhinal cortex (Young et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Otto, T., & Eichenbaum, H.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Otto, Tim
- ORCID
- Eichenbaum, Howard
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-334
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W2117977220
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (7r01ns026402-04)
- National Institute on Aging (NIA AG09973)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS26402)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- hippocampal CA1, neuronal firing patterns, recognition memory, odor-guided behavior, memory comparison
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Evoked Potentials, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Neurons, Odorants, Psychomotor Performance, Pyramidal Tracts, Reward, Time Factors, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review