Cited by 78Memory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Dentate gyrus destruction and spatial learning impairment after corticosteroid removal in young and middle‐aged rats

Conrad, Cheryl D., Roy, Edward J.·1995·Hippocampus

Abstract

We investigated the functional and behavioral implications of chronic corticosteroid removal in young and middle-aged rats. Prepubertal and 13-month-old rats were adrenalectomized (ADX) or sham operated (SHAM). The young ADX rats were divided further into three groups: ADX with no hormone replacement, ADX given corticosterone chronically, (chCORT), and ADX given corticosterone acutely at the time of Morris water maze testing (acCORT). All rats were run on the Morris water maze 12 weeks after surgery. They were then sacrificed and the brains were removed for histological analysis. The results showed that prolonged corticosteroid absence caused major damage to the dentate gyrus and learning impairment on the Morris water maze. The chCORT rats had little dentate gyrus cell loss and were as efficient as the controls in Morris water maze performance, whereas the acCORT rats had dentate gyrus cell loss and were impaired in the spatial acquisition task. Furthermore, exogenously administered corticosterone had an interactive effect on ADX rats. Water maze performance was improved in dentate gyrus damaged rats (acCORT) compared to ADX rats not given corticosterone, whereas ADX rats with very little dentate gyrus damage (chCORT) did not exhibit better water maze performance relative to controls. Middle-aged ADX rats lost cells only in the dorsal blade of the dentate gyrus but they did not show a learning impairment in the Morris water maze relative to the middle-aged controls. These re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.450050103

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, C. D., & Roy, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Roy, Edward J.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2081592958
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenalectomy, corticosteroid deficiency, corticosterone, dentate gyrus, spatial learning, hippocampal granule cells, neuroprotection, aging, Morris water maze, hippocampal neurogenesis
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adrenalectomy, Aging, Animals, Corticosterone, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Potassium, Sodium, Space Perception, Weight Gain, Pyramidal Cells, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review