Cited by 88Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Reduction of the threshold for long‐term potentiation by prior theta‐frequency synaptic activity

Christie, Brain R., Stellwagen, David, Abraham, Wickliffe C.·1995·Hippocampus

Abstract

Activation of the lateral perforant path input to the dentate gyrus with theta-patterned conditioning trains produced LTP of synaptic efficacy that changed in magnitude as an inverted U-shaped function of the number of trains. The LTP induction function was not fixed, however, and could be shifted to the left by administering 5 Hz "priming" stimulation to the lateral path 10 min prior to the conditioning trains. The priming effect was input specific and selective to a narrow window of stimulus frequencies. The shift to the left of the LTP induction function by priming stimulation was blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine sulphate. Nimodipine, an antagonist of L-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels, did not mimic the priming effect but instead produced a general facilitation of LTP induction. These data demonstrate that the degree to which LTP is induced in the lateral path is a non-linear function of afferent activity, and that this function, including LTP threshold, can be shifted to the left by prior synaptic activity at hippocampal theta-rhythm frequencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.450050107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior synaptic stimulation that is not sufficient to change synaptic strength can decrease the threshold for subsequent LTP.

    “In addition, prior synaptic stimulation, which is not sufficient to change synaptic strength, can decrease the threshold for subsequent LTP (102).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christie, B. R., Stellwagen, D., & Abraham, W. C.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Abraham, Wickliffe C.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
52-59
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2091881805
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
long-term potentiation, theta oscillations, lateral perforant path, dentate gyrus, L-type calcium channels, muscarinic receptors, atropine, nimodipine, synaptic plasticity, afferent activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Atropine, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Synapses, Theta Rhythm, Calcium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Muscarinic Agonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review