Cervical cancer screening status and implementation challenges: Report from selected states of India
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cervical cancer contributes to 6%–29% of the cancers in India. Although the Government of India in 2010 integrated cancer screening within the National Programme for the prevention of Non‐communicable Diseases, only 22% of women aged 15–45 years had undergone examination of the cervix by 2016. This prompts the question regarding the organisation of the program's implementation and service delivery and regarding challenges that may explain poor screening uptake. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were held with program managers and implementers in seven districts of three selected States of India. The data analysis looked at program content, the organisation of screening delivery, and the challenges to the implementation of the program, considering six theoretically derived dimensions of public health capacity: leadership and governance, organisational structure, financial resources, workforce, partnerships, and knowledge development. Results: Participants perceive the existing capacities across the six domains as insufficient to implement the CCS program nationwide. A context specific implementation, a better coordination between the program and district health facilities, timely remuneration, better maintenance of data and a strong monitoring system are possible solutions to remove health system related barriers. Conclusion: The study provides evidence on the practical challenges and provides recommendations for strengthening the capacities of the health system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pain and discomfort have been barriers to CC home-testing.
“Pain and discomfort have been barriers to CC home-testing [22,26].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
Accessibility barriers might disproportionately affect those living in remote areas or with lower socio-economic status.
“Accessibility barriers might disproportionately affect those living in remote areas or with lower socio-economic status (SES) [26].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
Long wait times can be a barrier.
“Long wait times can be a barrier [22,26], whereas more flexible access, e.g., flexible scheduling or options for screening facilities can increase attendance [10].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
Determinants of women's participation in cervical cancer screening trail, Maharashtra, India
Nene, B. (2007) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.06.031195 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W. (2022) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02019-y · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review
Palsola, M., Likki, T., Snijders, V., Corbex, M., Lasierra, L., & Curtis, B. (2026) · Glasnik javnog zdravlja · doi:10.5937/serbjph2601086p
- Authors
- Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY) Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- School of Public Health Université Catholique de Louvain Woluwe, Brussels Belgium
- Corresponding author
- Dsouza, Jyoshma Preema
- Venue
- The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-10-29
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 824-838
- ISSN
- 0749-6753 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1751
- OpenAlex
- W3207983013
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The International Journal of Health Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, screening uptake, program implementation challenges, public health capacity, health system capacity, healthcare workers, health care financing, health governance, India
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, India, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Organizations, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review