Cited by 16Health Policy Implementation ScienceWomen's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Cervical cancer screening status and implementation challenges: Report from selected states of India

Open access
Dsouza, Jyoshma Preema, Van den Broucke, Stephan, Pattanshetty, Sanjay, Dhoore, William·2022·The International Journal of Health Planning and Management

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer contributes to 6%–29% of the cancers in India. Although the Government of India in 2010 integrated cancer screening within the National Programme for the prevention of Non‐communicable Diseases, only 22% of women aged 15–45 years had undergone examination of the cervix by 2016. This prompts the question regarding the organisation of the program's implementation and service delivery and regarding challenges that may explain poor screening uptake. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were held with program managers and implementers in seven districts of three selected States of India. The data analysis looked at program content, the organisation of screening delivery, and the challenges to the implementation of the program, considering six theoretically derived dimensions of public health capacity: leadership and governance, organisational structure, financial resources, workforce, partnerships, and knowledge development. Results: Participants perceive the existing capacities across the six domains as insufficient to implement the CCS program nationwide. A context specific implementation, a better coordination between the program and district health facilities, timely remuneration, better maintenance of data and a strong monitoring system are possible solutions to remove health system related barriers. Conclusion: The study provides evidence on the practical challenges and provides recommendations for strengthening the capacities of the health system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hpm.3353

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY) Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • School of Public Health Université Catholique de Louvain Woluwe, Brussels Belgium
Corresponding author
Dsouza, Jyoshma Preema
Venue
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
824-838
ISSN
  • 0749-6753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1751
OpenAlex
W3207983013
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Health Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening uptake, program implementation challenges, public health capacity, health system capacity, healthcare workers, health care financing, health governance, India
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, India, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Organizations, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review