Cited by 154Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Determinants of women's participation in cervical cancer screening trail, Maharashtra, India

Open access
Nene, Bhagwan·2007·Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening and follow-up treatment in the context of a randomized controlled trial. The trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and cost effectiveness of visual inspection with acetic acid, cytological screening and testing for human papillomavirus in reducing the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer in Maharashtra, India. METHODS: Between October 1999 and November 2003 women aged 30-59 years were randomized to receive one of the three tests or to a control group. Participation was analysed for all three intervention arms. The differences between those who were screened versus those who were not was analysed according to the sociodemographic characteristics of the 100,800 eligible women invited for screening. Those who were treated versus those who were not were analysed according to the sociodemographic characteristics of the 932 women diagnosed with high-grade lesions. Participation in screening and compliance with treatment were also analysed according to the type of test used. FINDINGS: Compared with women who were not tested, screened women were younger (aged 30-39), better educated and had ever used contraception. A higher proportion of screened women were married and a lower proportion had never been pregnant. Of the 932 women diagnosed with high-grade lesions or invasive cancer, 85.3% (795) received treatment. Women with higher levels of education, who had had fewer pregnancies and those who were married were more likely to comply with treatment. There were no differences in rates of screening or compliance with treatment when results were analysed by the test received. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the test being used, good participation levels for cervical cancer screening can be achieved in rural areas of developing countries by using appropriate strategies to deliver services. Communication methods and delivery strategies aimed at encouraging older, less-educated women, who have less contact with reproductive services, are needed to further increase screening uptake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2471/blt.06.031195

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies from India have identified barriers to cervical cancer screening on several socioecological levels, including lack of knowledge, personal disbelief in prevention of cancer, lack of care-seeking when asymptomatic, lack of money for treatment, and reduced access to healthcare services.

    “Studies from India have identified barriers on several socioecological levels such as lack of knowledge, personal disbelief in prevention of cancer, lack of care-seeking when asymptomatic, lack of money for treatment, and reduced access to healthcare services [6–8].”

    From A community‐based, cross‐sectional study of hr<scp>HPV DNA</scp> self‐sampling‐based cervical cancer screening in rural Karnataka, India (2019) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction and Discussion identify lack of knowledge, unfamiliarity with prevention, and economic and geographic barriers to cervical cancer screening. The paper does not specifically identify failure to seek care when asymptomatic or lack of money for treatment as barriers; the Discussion says treatment in this study was free and economic barriers were unlikely to explain reduced follow-up. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lacey L, Whitfield J, DeWhite W, Ansell D, Whitman S, Chen E, et al. Referral adherence in an inner city breast and cervical cancer screening program. Cancer 1993;72:950-5.
  2. Formenti SC, Meyerowitz BE, Ell K, Muderspach L, Groshen S, Leedham B, et al. Inadequate adherence to radiotherapy in Latina immigrants with carcinoma of the cervix: potential impact on disease free survival. Cancer 1995;75:1135-40.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nene, B.
Affiliations
Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Nene, Bhagwan
Venue
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Publisher
WHO Press
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
264-272
ISSN
0042-9686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128210106
Cited by
154
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening uptake, visual inspection with acetic acid, Pap smear, HPV testing, medication adherence, sociodemographic factors, high-grade cervical lesions, rural women, Maharashtra
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, India, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Socioeconomic Factors, Rural Health Services, Gravidity, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review