How can intersectoral collaboration and action help improve the education, recruitment, and retention of the health and care workforce? A scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Inadequate numbers, maldistribution, attrition, and inadequate skill‐mix are widespread health and care workforce (HCWF) challenges. Intersectoral—inclusive of different government sectors, non‐state actors, and the private sector—collaboration and action are foundational to the development of a responsive and sustainable HCWF. This review presents evidence on how to work across sectors to educate, recruit, and retain a sustainable HCWF, highlighting examples of the benefits and challenges of intersectoral collaboration. We carried out a scoping review of scientific and grey literature with inclusion criteria around intersectoral governance and mechanisms for the HCWF. A framework analysis to identify and collate factors linked to the education, recruitment, and retention of the HCWF was carried out. Fifty‐six documents were included. We identified a wide array of recommendations for intersectoral activity to support the education, recruitment, and retention of the HCWF. For HCWF education: formalise intersectoral decision‐making bodies; align HCWF education with population health needs; expand training capacity; engage and regulate private sector training; seek international training opportunities and support; and innovate in training by leveraging digital technologies. For HCWF recruitment: ensure there is intersectoral clarity and cooperation; ensure bilateral agreements are ethical; carry out data‐informed recruitment; and learn from COVID‐19 about mobilising the domestic workforce. For HCWF retention: innovate around available staff, especially where staff are scarce; improve working and employment conditions; and engage the private sector. Political will and commensurate investment must underscore any intersectoral collaboration for the HCWF.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865 · see citing works
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3 · Cited by 4,057 · see citing works
Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic
Frenk, J., Chen, L. C., Chandran, L., Groff, E. O. H., King, R., Meleis, A., & Fineberg, H. V. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02092-x · Cited by 369 · see citing works
The health workforce status in the WHO African Region: findings of a cross-sectional study
Ahmat, A., Okoroafor, S. C., Kazanga, I., Asamani, J. A., Millogo, J. J. S., Illou, M. M. A., Mwinga, K., & Nyoni, J. (2022) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008317 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Tancred, T., Falkenbach, M., Raven, J., & Caffrey, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Tancred, Tara
- Venue
- The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-02-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 757-780
- ISSN
- 0749-6753 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1751
- OpenAlex
- W4391592262
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The International Journal of Health Planning and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- intersectoral collaboration, health and care workforce, personnel selection, employee retention, workforce education, employee attrition, skill mix, intersectoral governance, workforce planning, private sector participation, employee training, working conditions, political will
- MeSH terms
- Intersectoral Collaboration, COVID-19, Health Workforce, Health Personnel, Humans, Personnel Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review