Cited by 4,057Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and Practices

High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution

Open access
Kruk, Margaret E, Gage, Anna D, Arsenault, Catherine, Jordan, Keely, Leslie, Hannah H, Roder-DeWan, Sanam, Adeyi, Olusoji, Barker, Pierre +24 more·2018·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

deaths from cardio vascular disease, 1 million newborn deaths, 900 000 deaths from tubercu losis, and half of all maternal deaths each year.Quality of care will become an even larger driver of population health as utilisation of health systems increases and as the burden of disease shifts to more complex conditions.The high mortality rates in LMICs for treatable causes, such as injuries and surgical con ditions, maternal and newborn complications, cardio vascular disease, and vaccine preventable diseases, illustrate the breadth and depth of the healthcare quality challenge.Poor-quality care can lead to other adverse outcomes, including un necessary health-related suffering, persistent symptoms, loss of function, and a lack of trust and confidence in health systems.Waste of resources and catastrophic expenditures are economic side effects of poor-quality health systems.As a result of this, only one-quarter of people in LMICs believe that their health systems work well. Health systems should measure and report what matters most to people, such as competent care, user experience, health outcomes, and confidence in the systemMeasurement is key to accountability and improvement, but available measures do not capture many of the processes and outcomes that matter most to people.At the same time, data systems generate many metrics that produce inadequate insight at a substantial cost in funds and health workers' time.For example, although inputs such as medicines and equipment are commonly counted in surveys, these are weakly related to the quality of care that people receive.Indicators such as proportion of births with skilled attendants do not reflect quality of childbirth care and might lead to false complacency about progress in maternal and newborn health.This Commission calls for fewer, but better, measures of health system quality to be generated and used at national and subnational levels.Countries should report health system performance to the public annually by use of a dashboard of key metrics (eg, health outcomes, people's confidence in the system, system competence, and user experience) along with measures of financial protection and equity.Robust vital registries and trust worthy routine health information systems are prerequi sites for good performance assessment.Countries need agile new surveys and real-time measures of health facilities and populations that reflect the health systems of today and not those of the past.To generate and interpret data, countries need to invest in national institutions and professionals with strong quantitative and analytical skills.Global develop ment partners can support the generation and testing of public goods for health system measurement (civil and vital registries, routine data systems, and routine health system surveys) and promote national and regional institutions and the training and mentoring of scientists. New research is crucial for the transformation of low-quality health systems to high-quality onesData on care quality in LMICs do not reflect the current disease burden.In many of these countries, we know little about quality of care for respiratory diseases, cancer, mental health, injuries, and surgery, as well as the care of adolescents and elderly people.There are vast blind spots in areas such as user experience, system competence, confidence in the system, and the wellbeing of people, including patient-reported outcomes.Measuring the quality of the health system as a whole and across the care continuum is essential, but not done.Filling in these gaps will require not only better routine health information systems for monitoring, but also new research, as proposed in the research agenda of this Commission.For example, research will be needed to rigorously evaluate the effects and costs of recommended improvement approaches on health, patient experience, and financial protection.Implementation science studies can help discern the contextual factors that promote or hinder reform.New data collection and research should be explicitly designed to build national and regional research capacity. Improving quality of care will require system-wide actionTo address the scale and range of quality deficits we documented in this Commission, reforming the foundations of the health system is required.Because health systems are complex adaptive systems that function at multiple interconnected levels, fixes at the micro-level (ie, health-care provider or clinic) alone are unlikely to alter the underlying performance of the whole system.However, we found that interventions aimed at changing provider behaviour dominate the improvement field, even though many of these interventions have a modest effect on provider performance and are difficult to scale and sustain over time.Achieving high-quality health systems requires expanding the space for improvement to structural reforms that act on the foundations of the system.This Commission endorses four universal actions to

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3

Cites

271 of 271 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence has shown that a robust PHC system can improve population health outcomes, reduce all-cause mortality and is cost-effective in achieving UHC in LMICs.

    “Evidence has shown that a robust PHC system can improve population health outcomes, reduce all-cause mortality and is cost-effective in achieving UHC in LMICs [44–46].”

    From Assessment of the compliance with minimum quality standards by public primary healthcare facilities in Nigeria (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

    In “Universal action 2: Redesign service delivery to optimise quality” (page unavailable), the paper describes benefits of competent primary care in LMICs, including better HIV follow-up and lower implementation costs for community-based tuberculosis care. Its mortality estimates and UHC cost estimates concern health-system quality and broader interventions, not a robust PHC system specifically. The cited passages therefore do not establish reduced all-cause mortality or PHC’s cost-effectiveness in achieving UHC. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The health sector is essential to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal "Good health and well-being" and related goals.

    “On the one hand, this sector is essential to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (UNSDG) “Good health and well-being” and related goals [9].”
  • Use of available health services results from the confluence of both demand (patient) and supply (health service) side factors.

    “The use of available health services results from the confluence of both demand (patient) and supply (health service) side factors [5].”
  • Actions to promote and measure health system quality could be readily aligned and embedded within a modular approach.

    “Actions to promote and measure health system quality could be readily aligned and embedded within a modular approach.134”
  • Rising mortality from complex NCDs creates a need for high-quality, longitudinal, integrated care.

    “However, changes in health care needs owing to increased mortality from complex NCDs require high-quality, longitudinal, and integrated care (6).”

    From Artificial intelligence for global health (2019) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 274 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [106]106. Cisneros-González N, Ascencio-Montiel IJ, Libreros-Bango VN, et al. Índice de amputaciones de extremidades inferiores en pacientes con diabetes. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2016; 54: 472-79. 109
  2. [142]142. Jordan K, Marten R, Gureje O, Daelmans B, Kruk ME. Where is quality in health systems policy? A commentary on global policy documents. Lancet Glob Health (in press). 150
  3. [177]177. Leisher SH, Sprockett A, Longfield K, Montagu D, eds. Quality measurement in family planning: past, present, future: papers from the Bellagio meeting on family planning quality, October 2015. Oakland, CA: Metrics for Management, 2016. http://m4mgmt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Bellagio-book- web.pdf (accessed Aug 14, 2018). 199 International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. Hypertension in low-and middle-income countries: data collection reference guide. Cambridge, MA, 2017. http://www.ichom.org/ download/hypertension-in-low-and-middle-income-countries/ (accessed Nov 15, 2017). 200
  4. [178]178. Okunade O, Arora J, Haverhals A, Niessen L. Collaborating for Value: the Santeon Hospitals in the Netherlands. Cambridge, MA: ICHOM, 2017. http://www.ichom.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ Santeon_Case_Study_Final.pdf (accessed Nov 15, 2017). 201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., English, M., García-Elorrio, E., Guanais, F., Gureje, O., Hirschhorn, L. R., Jiang, L., Kelley, E., Lemango, E. T., Liljestrand, J., Malata, A., Marchant, T., Matsoso, M. P., Meara, J. G., Mohanan, M., Ndiaye, Y., Norheim, O. F., Reddy, K. S., Rowe, A. K., Salomon, J. A., Thapa, G., Twum-Danso, N. A. Y., & Pate, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • World Bank (US)
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • Inter-American Development Bank (US)
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Federal Ministry of Health (ET)
  • Gates Foundation (US)
  • Malawi University of Science and Technology (MW)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Department of Health (ZA)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Ministère de la Santé Publique et Action Sociale (SN)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Government of Nepal (NP)
Corresponding author
Kruk, Margaret E
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
e1196-e1252
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891125414
Cited by
4,057
References
274
Citations by year
2026: 704 · 2025: 696 · 2024: 682 · 2023: 600 · 2022: 408 · 2021: 394 · 2020: 329 · 2019: 213 · 2018: 28
FWCI
44.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
health system quality, Sustainable Development Goals, low- and middle-income countries, health indicators, health outcomes, user experience, health system accountability, health information systems, health facility survey, healthcare workers, health care financing, health equity, health system transformation, health professions education, health workforce recruitment, health workforce distribution
MeSH terms
Sustainable Development, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Goals, Humans, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review