The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects
Abstract
In spite of a widespread belief in the importance of integrating learning and work, little is known about the conditions that promote such an integration. In order to both clarify the concept of learning and see how to integrate learning and work, this article distinguishes between two major modes of learning: adaptive and developmental learning, which the author breaks down into four levels. Using these conceptualizations as a starting point, the article focuses on identifying and analyzing a number of factors that are assumed to be critical for facilitating or constraining an integration of learning and work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization
Senge, P. M. (1991) · Performance + Instruction · doi:10.1002/pfi.4170300510 · Cited by 20,060
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,390
Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0381 · Cited by 8,220
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · Cited by 6,447
How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process
Bugg, E. G., & Dewey, J. (1934) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415632 · Cited by 5,350
Cited by
The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x · Cited by 598
Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12044 · Cited by 489
Informal workplace learning: development and validation of a measure
Decius, J., Schaper, N., & Seifert, A. (2019) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21368 · Cited by 127
Lichtwarck, B., Myhre, J., Goyal, A. R., Rokstad, A. M. M., Selbaek, G., Kirkevold, Ø., & Bergh, S. (2019) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2018.1464116 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellström, P.
- Venue
- Human Resource Development Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-435
- ISSN
- 1044-8004 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1096
- OpenAlex
- W1986312252
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 21.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hrdq.1006
- The paper
- Ellström, P. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
