Cited by 132Employer Branding and e-HRMAI and HR TechnologiesHuman Resource and Talent Management

Information technology usage and human resource roles and effectiveness

Haines, Victor Y., Lafleur, Geneviève·2008·Human Resource Management

Abstract

The human resource function has undergone dramatic change, owing, it would seem, to greater use of rapidly evolving information technology. This study presents the results of an empirical investigation into the associations between the use of information technology and the roles and effectiveness of the human resource function. The results support relationships between information technology use and greater involvement in the strategic HR roles of business partner and change agent. Positive associations between information technology use and technical and strategic effectiveness also revealed the transformational potential of information technology–supported human resource management applications. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.20230

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in terminology over time reflect the evolution of the HR field, from conventional personnel management functions towards the greater use of IT systems and data for strategic purposes such as workforce planning.

    “Changes in terminology over time reflect the evolution of the HR field, from conventional personnel management functions (e.g.payroll), towards the greater use of IT systems and data for strategic purposes such as workforce planning (e.g.Haines & Lafleur, 2008).”

    From People analytics—A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions (2018) · cites this paper as Haines & Lafleur, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haines, V. Y., & Lafleur, G.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Haines, Victor Y.
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-19
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
525-540
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W2125284764
Cited by
132
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
information technology use, human resource roles, business partner role, strategy effectiveness, technical effectiveness, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review