Simulation of heat transfer in the cool storage unit of a liquid–air energy storage system
Abstract
An energy storage system that stores energy in the form of liquid air was studied. In this system, the cool storage unit was the most important unit. From the viewpoint of safety and economy, it was most promising to store the cold energy as the sensitive heat of a solid such as pebbles or concrete. A simulator was developed to predict temperature variations of the solid cool storage unit. The simulator calculated unsteady heat transfer between a supercritical gas flow and the solid material. Comparison of calculated and experimental results showed that the temperature variation of the metal cool storage medium was accurate within 11%. The calculated results showed for the concrete cool storage unit that a smaller quantity of medium was required with a smaller pitch of the tube. The minimum quantity of concrete calculated at the smallest pitch was three times that of concrete, which was simply estimated from the heat capacity of concrete and air. The volume required for concrete cool storage was less than 1/100 that of reservoirs for a pumped‐hydro power station having a vertical drop of 500 m. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heat Trans Asian Res, 31(4): 284–296, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/htj.10035
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After one additional paper in 1982 by Dooley et al., no documents regarding liquid air as energy storage were published until 1998 in Japan by Mitsubishi-Hitachi, with no further developments after 2002.
“After one additional paper was published in 1982 by Dooley et al. [25], no documents regarding liquid air as energy storage were published until the year 1998 in Japan by Mitsubishi-Hitachi [26][27][28][29][30][31], with no further developments after 2002.”
From Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
She, X., Peng, X., Nie, B., Leng, G., Zhang, X., Weng, L., Tong, L., Zheng, L., Wang, L., & Ding, Y. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.102 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis
Borri, E., Tafone, A., Zsembinszki, G., Comodi, G., Romagnoli, A., & Cabeza, L. F. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082773 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Liquid air energy storage – from theory to demonstration
Morgan, R. E. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Studies · doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1189741 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Araki, H., Nakabaru, M., & Chino, K.
- Affiliations
- Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- Heat Transfer—Asian Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-296
- ISSN
- 1099-2871 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1496
- OpenAlex
- W2162054085
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Heat Transfer-Asian Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Keywords
- liquid air energy storage, transient heat transfer, tube pitch, cold energy storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review