Cited by 140Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysGenomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The UMD TP53 database and website: update and revisions

Hamroun, Dalil, Kato, Shunsuke, Ishioka, Chikashi, Claustres, Mireille, Béroud, Christophe, Soussi, Thierry·2006·Human Mutation

Abstract

Mutation of the p53 gene is the most frequent genetic alteration found in human cancer, but it is also the most frequently reported with more than 22,000 mutations published in 2,000 papers. In 1991, we developed a database and software to handle and analyze all this information. The database has been widely used for clinical analysis and molecular epidemiology. We have expanded the scope of the database by integrating structural, phylogenetic and biological information on wild-type (wt) and mutant TP53. Integration of the TP53 mutant activity database provides unique information that will be useful to both clinicians and scientists. All of this information is available from a new website (www.umd.be:2072/) that will generate a detailed informative page for every TP53 mutant in the database. New tools to check TP53 mutations and minimize errors found in the literature are also available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.20269

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tumors use several routes to disable TP53, and the most frequent route is missense mutation of TP53, with some mutants acquiring gain-of-function activities.

    “Tumors, which drastically deviate from these parameters, have evolved multiple mechanisms to inactivate TP53, the most prevalent of which is the emergence of TP53 missense mutations, some of which have gain-of function activities.”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Hamroun, et al., 2006

  • About 75% of TP53 mutations in cancer are missense mutations.

    “In particular, missense mutations account for approximately 75% of all TP53 mutations in cancer (Hamroun, et al., 2006; Olivier, et al., 2010)”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Hamroun, et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamroun, D., Kato, S., Ishioka, C., Claustres, M., Béroud, C., & Soussi, T.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Soussi, Thierry
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2006-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
14-20
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W2058701056
Cited by
140
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Mutation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL Portal Artxiker (Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (India)) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
TP53, TP53 mutation, wild-type p53, cancer genetics, molecular epidemiology
MeSH terms
DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Mutation, Phylogeny, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Internet, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review