Cited by 62Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Single nucleotide differences (SNDs) in the dbSNP database may lead to errors in genotyping and haplotyping studies

Open access
Musumeci, Lucia, Arthur, Jonathan W., Cheung, Florence S. G., Hoque, Ashraful, Lippman, Scott, Reichardt, Juergen K. V.·2010·Human Mutation

Abstract

The creation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) databases (such as NCBI dbSNP) has facilitated scientific research in many fields. SNP discovery and detection has improved to the extent that there are over 17 million human reference (rs) SNPs reported to date (Build 129 of dbSNP). SNP databases are unfortunately not always complete and/or accurate. In fact, half of the reported SNPs are still only candidate SNPs and are not validated in a population. We describe the identification of SNDs (single nucleotide differences) in humans, that may contaminate the dbSNP database. These SNDs, reported as real SNPs in the database, do not exist as such, but are merely artifacts due to the presence of a paralogue (highly similar duplicated) sequence in the genome. Using sequencing we showed how SNDs could originate in two paralogous genes and evaluated samples from a population of 100 individuals for the presence/absence of SNPs. Moreover, using bioinformatics, we predicted as many as 8.32% of the biallelic, coding SNPs in the dbSNP database to be SNDs. Our identification of SNDs in the database will allow researchers to not only select truly informative SNPs for association studies, but also aid in determining accurate SNP genotypes and haplotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.21137

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SNPs in AKR1C1, AKR1C2, and AKR1C4 have been studied at the protein level, and Phe46Tyr has been associated with disease.

    “So far SNPs in AKR1C1, AKR1C2 and AKR1C4 have been studied at the protein level and Phe46Tyr has been associated with disease [95–97, 99, 103, 104].”
  • Bioinformatics predicted that 8.3% of biallelic coding SNPs in dbSNP represent single nucleotide differences.

    “Based on a bioinformatics approach it has been predicted that 8.3% of biallelic, coding SNPs in the dbSNP database represent single nucleotide differences (SNDs) [104].”
  • Takahashi et al. functionally characterized 11 nonsynonymous AKR1C2 SNPs known at the time, but later bioinformatics showed only five are real: Phe46Tyr, Val111Ala, Lys179Gln, Lys185Gln, and Arg258Cys.

    “In AKR1C2 Takahashi et al. functionally characterized 11 nonsynonymous SNPs known at the time but later bioinformatics studies showed that only 5 of these represent real SNPs: Phe46Tyr, Vall11Ala, Lys179Gln, Lys185Gln and Arg258Cys [104].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Musumeci, L., Arthur, J. W., Cheung, F. S. G., Hoque, A., Lippman, S., & Reichardt, J. K. V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Reichardt, Juergen K. V.
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2010-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W2150709695
Cited by
62
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Mutation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Sydney
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA023100, P01CA108964)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
dbSNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms, paralogs, whole-genome duplication, SNP validation, association studies
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Errors, Genotype, Haplotypes, Humans, Genome, Human, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Computational Biology, Internet, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Genetic, Genetic Association Studies, Aurora Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review