Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for germline TP53 variants

Open access
Fortuno, Cristina, Lee, Kristy, Olivier, Magali, Pesaran, Tina, Mai, Phuong L., Andrade, Kelvin C., Attardi, Laura D., Crowley, Stephanie, Evans, D. Gareth, Feng, Bing‐Jian, Foreman, Ann K. M., Frone, Megan N., Huether, Robert, James, Paul A., McGoldrick, Kelly, Mester, Jessica, Seifert, Bryce A., Slavin, Thomas P., Witkowski, Leora, Zhang, Liying, Plon, Sharon E., Spurdle, Amanda B., Savage, Sharon A., the ClinGen TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel·2021·Human Mutation

Abstract

Germline pathogenic variants in TP53 are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a cancer predisposition disorder inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern associated with a high risk of malignancy, including early-onset breast cancers, sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, and brain tumors. Intense cancer surveillance for individuals with TP53 germline pathogenic variants is associated with reduced cancer-related mortality. Accurate and consistent classification of germline variants across clinical and research laboratories is important to ensure appropriate cancer surveillance recommendations. Here, we describe the work performed by the Clinical Genome Resource TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel (ClinGen TP53 VCEP) focused on specifying the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for germline variant classification to the TP53 gene. Specifications were developed for 20 ACMG/AMP criteria, while nine were deemed not applicable. The original strength level for the 10 criteria was also adjusted due to current evidence. Use of TP53-specific guidelines and sharing of clinical data among experts and clinical laboratories led to a decrease in variants of uncertain significance from 28% to 12% compared with the original guidelines. The ClinGen TP53 VCEP recommends the use of these TP53-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines as the standard strategy for TP53 germline variant classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.24152

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Fortuno, C., Lee, K., Olivier, M., Pesaran, T., Mai, P. L., Andrade, K. C., Attardi, L. D., Crowley, S., Evans, D. G., Feng, B., Foreman, A. K. M., Frone, M. N., Huether, R., James, P. A., McGoldrick, K., Mester, J., Seifert, B. A., Slavin, T. P., Witkowski, L., Zhang, L., Plon, S. E., Spurdle, A. B., Savage, S. A., & Panel, T. C. T. V. C. E.
Venue
Human Mutation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-25
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
223-236
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W3111162271
Cited by
167
References
11
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for germline TP53 variants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.24152
The paper
Fortuno, C., Lee, K., Olivier, M., Pesaran, T., Mai, P. L., Andrade, K. C., Attardi, L. D., Crowley, S., Evans, D. G., Feng, B., Foreman, A. K. M., Frone, M. N., Huether, R., James, P. A., McGoldrick, K., Mester, J., Seifert, B. A., Slavin, T. P., Witkowski, L., . . . Panel, T. C. T. V. C. E. (2021). Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for germline TP53 variants. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24152

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.