Cited by 556Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer

Open access
Giacomelli, Andrew O., Yang, Xiaoping, Lintner, Robert E., McFarland, James M., Duby, Marc, Kim, Jaegil, Howard, Thomas P., Takeda, David Y. +19 more·2018·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Unlike most tumor suppressor genes, the most common genetic alterations in tumor protein p53 (TP53) are missense mutations 1,2. Mutant p53 protein is often abundantly expressed in cancers and specific allelic variants exhibit dominant-negative or gain-of-function activities in experimental models 3-8. To gain a systematic view of p53 function, we interrogated loss-of-function screens conducted in hundreds of human cancer cell lines and performed TP53 saturation mutagenesis screens in an isogenic pair of TP53 wild-type and null cell lines. We found that loss or dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function reliably enhanced cellular fitness. By integrating these data with the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) mutational signatures database 9,10, we developed a statistical model that describes the TP53 mutational spectrum as a function of the baseline probability of acquiring each mutation and the fitness advantage conferred by attenuation of p53 activity. Collectively, these observations show that widely-acting and tissue-specific mutational processes combine with phenotypic selection to dictate the frequencies of recurrent TP53 mutations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-018-0204-y

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giacomelli, A. O., Yang, X., Lintner, R. E., McFarland, J. M., Duby, M., Kim, J., Howard, T. P., Takeda, D. Y., Ly, S. H., Kim, E., Gannon, H. S., Hurhula, B., Sharpe, T., Goodale, A., Fritchman, B., Steelman, S., Vazquez, F., Tsherniak, A., Aguirre, A. J., Doench, J. G., Piccioni, F., Roberts, C. W. M., Meyerson, M., Getz, G., Johannessen, C. M., Root, D. E., & Hahn, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hahn, William C.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1381-1387
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2891731267
Cited by
556
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Broad Institute
  • Nature
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001102)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA176058, U01CA199253, K08CA218420)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753, T32GM007226)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
TP53 mutation, mutational signatures, mutational processes, loss-of-function screen, saturation mutagenesis, dominant-negative p53, tumor suppressor, somatic mutations, cell fitness, phenotypic selection, COSMIC, cancer cell lines
MeSH terms
A549 Cells, Alleles, Cells, Cultured, DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Mutagenesis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Databases, Genetic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review