Cited by 18Treatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Double‐blind comparative study of the action of repeated administration of milnacipran versus placebo on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers

Poirier, M. F., Galinowski, A., Amado, I., Longevialle, R., Bourdel, M. C., Tournoux, A., Serre, C., Loo, H.·2004·Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

Objective: The principal objective was to compare the effects of milnacipran, an antidepressant characterized by a dual‐action on serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake, with placebo on memory, attention and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of milnacipran on mood, anxiety and vigilance in these subjects. Methods: In a double‐blind crossover randomized trial, milnacipran (50 mg b.d.) or placebo was administered during two periods of 7 days separated by a washout period of 7 days. Memory tests (recall of words, images and coloured bars), tests to evaluate attention and vigilance (squares test, critical flicker fusion test and choice reaction time test) and visual analogue scales for affect and sleep were used. Results: There were no significant differences between milnacipran and placebo groups with respect to the psychomotor functions tested. No differences were observed in the Norris scales for vigilance, anxiety or satisfaction or in the sleep questionnaire (sleep latency, sleep quality and waking). Conclusion: Milnacipran, administered at 100 mg per day for 7 days to healthy volunteers, had no effects on cognitive functions. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy participants, milnacipran did not differ from placebo in subjective sleep ratings.

    “(Poirier et al., 2004) demonstrated that milnacipran was associated with improvements in subjective sleep ratings (sleep latency, sleep quality and waking), but did not differ from placebo in this respect.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Poirier et al., 2004

  • In healthy participants, milnacipran was associated with improvements in subjective sleep ratings (sleep latency, sleep quality and waking).

    “(Poirier et al., 2004) demonstrated that milnacipran was associated with improvements in subjective sleep ratings (sleep latency, sleep quality and waking), but did not differ from placebo in this respect.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Poirier et al., 2004

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1097/00004850-199609004-00002 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0033291700045608 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0091-3057(95)00210-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00004850-199300810-00007 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb05767.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1976.tb02388.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0924-977X(97)00416-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00004850-199807006-00002 · DOI
  9. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00124.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1097/00004850-199609004-00005 · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.39016.x · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00004850-199609004-00004 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/00004850-199609004-00006 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/00004850-199609004-00007 · DOI
  15. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69020815.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0028-3908(85)90157-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0028-3908(71)90039-6 · DOI
  18. O'Hanlon JF, 1996, Antidepressant therapy and behavioural competence, Br J Clin Pract, 50, 381, 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1996.tb09581.x · DOI
  19. 10.1007/BF00434408 · DOI
  20. 10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750160052010 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00109-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF00735818 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF00217054 · DOI
  24. Warot D, 1989, Effet de trois doses de maprotiline (25, 50 et 75 mg) sur la vigilance et la mémoire chez le volontaire sain, Thérapie, 44, 256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Poirier, M. F., Galinowski, A., Amado, I., Longevialle, R., Bourdel, M. C., Tournoux, A., Serre, C., & Loo, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR)
  • Pierre Fabre (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Tournoux, A.
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W2034024217
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2018: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
milnacipran, cognitive function, memory, attention, psychomotor performance, sustained attention, anxiety, mood, sleep, antidepressants, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Milnacipran, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Attention, Cognition, Cyclopropanes, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review