Effectiveness and tolerability of mirtazapine and amitriptyline in alcoholic patients with co-morbid depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies indicate that serotoninergic and noradrenergic pathophysiological mechanisms may underlie both alcohol abuse/dependence and depressive disorder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of two serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressant drugs-mirtazapine and amitriptyline, for the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence co-morbid with depressive disorder in a randomized, double-blind treatment setting. METHODS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to mirtazapine and twenty to amitriptyline groups. Thirty-six of them completed the study. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and alcohol craving questionnaire were used at baseline and, at days 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 to estimate the effectiveness of the antidepressant treatment. Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) was used in the assessment of alcohol dependence. The tolerability was assessed with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU). RESULTS: There was significant improvement in HDRS and alcohol craving scores with both the drugs. However there were no statistical differences between treatment groups. Mirtazapine was tolerated better than amitriptyline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with either mirtazapine or amitriptyline resulted with the reduction of HDRS and craving scores. The side-effect profile of mirtazapine was relatively favorable in our study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Altintoprak 2008, selective reporting was at unclear risk of reporting bias.
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
In Altintoprak 2008, random sequence generation was at unclear risk of selection bias.
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
In Altintoprak 2008, incomplete outcome data was at high risk of attrition bias for all outcomes.
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
In Altintoprak 2008, blinding of outcome assessment was at unclear risk of detection bias for all outcomes.
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
In Altintoprak 2008, allocation concealment was at unclear risk of selection bias.
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
In Altintoprak 2008, blinding of participants and personnel was at low risk of performance bias for all outcomes.
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk”
From Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions to reduce harmful alcohol use in low- and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as Altintoprak 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Altintoprak, A. E., Zorlu, N., Coskunol, H., Akdeniz, F., & Kitapcioglu, G.
- Affiliations
- Izmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
- Ege University (TR)
- ORCID
- Zorlu, Nabi
- Venue
- Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-319
- ISSN
- 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1077
- OpenAlex
- W2131664988
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- mirtazapine, amitriptyline, alcoholism, depressive disorders, comorbidities, antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, alcohol craving, adverse effects, serotonergic antidepressants, noradrenergic antidepressants
- MeSH terms
- Mirtazapine, Adult, Alcoholism, Amitriptyline, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Mianserin, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review