Cited by 40Treatment of Major DepressionSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effectiveness and tolerability of mirtazapine and amitriptyline in alcoholic patients with co-morbid depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind study

Altintoprak, A. Ender, Zorlu, Nabi, Coskunol, Hakan, Akdeniz, Fisun, Kitapcioglu, Gul·2008·Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies indicate that serotoninergic and noradrenergic pathophysiological mechanisms may underlie both alcohol abuse/dependence and depressive disorder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of two serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressant drugs-mirtazapine and amitriptyline, for the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence co-morbid with depressive disorder in a randomized, double-blind treatment setting. METHODS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to mirtazapine and twenty to amitriptyline groups. Thirty-six of them completed the study. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and alcohol craving questionnaire were used at baseline and, at days 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 to estimate the effectiveness of the antidepressant treatment. Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) was used in the assessment of alcohol dependence. The tolerability was assessed with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU). RESULTS: There was significant improvement in HDRS and alcohol craving scores with both the drugs. However there were no statistical differences between treatment groups. Mirtazapine was tolerated better than amitriptyline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with either mirtazapine or amitriptyline resulted with the reduction of HDRS and craving scores. The side-effect profile of mirtazapine was relatively favorable in our study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.935

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 40

Authors
Altintoprak, A. E., Zorlu, N., Coskunol, H., Akdeniz, F., & Kitapcioglu, G.
Affiliations
  • Izmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
  • Ege University (TR)
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-10
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
313-319
ISSN
  • 0885-6222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1077
OpenAlex
W2131664988
Cited by
40
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mirtazapine, amitriptyline, alcoholism, depressive disorders, comorbidities, antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, alcohol craving, adverse effects, serotonergic antidepressants, noradrenergic antidepressants
MeSH terms
Mirtazapine, Adult, Alcoholism, Amitriptyline, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Mianserin, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review