Cited by 53Peatlands and Wetlands EcologyEcology and biodiversity studiesHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of ditch blocking on the hydrological functioning of blanket peatlands

Open access

Abstract

Ditch blocking in blanket peatlands is common as part of peatland restoration. The effects of ditch blocking on flow regimes and nearby water tables were examined in a field trial. After an initial 6‐month monitoring period, eight ditches had peat dams installed 10 m apart along their entire length (dammed), four of these ditches were also partially infilled through bank reprofiling (reprofiled). Four ditches were left open with no dams or reprofiling (open). These 12 ditches and the surrounding peat were monitored for 4 more years. An initial five‐fold reduction in discharge occurred in the dammed and the reprofiled ditches with the displaced water being diverted to overland flow and pathways away from the ditches. However, there was a gradual change over time in ditch flow regime in subsequent years, with the overall volume of water leaving the dammed and the reprofiled ditches increasing per unit of rainfall to around twice that which occurred in the first year after blocking. Hence, monitoring for greater than one year is important for understanding hydrological impacts of peatland restoration. Overland flow and flow in the upper ~4 cm of peat was common and occurred in the inter‐ditch areas for over half of the time after ditch blocking. There was strong evidence that topographic boundaries of small ditch catchments, despite being defined using a high‐resolution Light Detection And Ranging‐based terrain model, were not always equivalent to actual catchment areas. Hence, caution is needed when upscaling area‐based fluxes, such as aquatic carbon fluxes, from smaller scale studies including those using ditches and small streams. The effect of ditch blocking on local water tables was spatially highly variable but small overall (time‐weighted mean effect <2 cm). Practitioners seeking to raise water tables through peatland restoration should first be informed either by prior measurement of water tables or by spatial modelling to show whether the peatland already has shallow water tables or whether there are locations that could potentially undergo large water‐table recoveries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hyp.11031

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the ability of ditches to defy natural watershed boundaries, the land areas with which ditches interact hydrologically can prove challenging to delineate, which can hinder the upscaling of aquatic fluxes of carbon and other solutes.

    “Due to the ability of ditches to defy natural watershed boundaries, the land areas with which ditches interact hydrologically can prove challenging to delineate, which can hinder the upscaling of aquatic fluxes of carbon and other solutes 118 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [118]

  • Management can include channelization, dredging, vegetation removal, flow and water-level regulation, or riparian zone management, all of which have the potential to affect in-situ hydrological processes as well as the eco-hydrology of the surrounding landscape.

    “Management can include channelization, dredging, vegetation removal, flow and water-level regulation 111,118,120 , or riparian zone management (e.g., vegetation removal, establishing trees, widening floodplains, fencing out livestock 104,121 ), all of which have the potential to affect insitu hydrological processes as well as the eco-hydrology of the surrounding landscape.”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [118]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1007/s13157-13013-10473-13152 · DOI
  2. Baird A. J. Holden J. &ChapmanP. J.(2009).A literature review of evidence on emissions of methane in peatlands Defra project SP0574. 54.
  3. 10.1002/wat1002.1063 · DOI
  4. Green F. H. W., 1974, Changes in artificial drainage, fertilizers, and climate in Scotland, Journal of Environmental Management, 2, 107
  5. 10.1111/j.1526-1100X.2010.00704.x · DOI
  6. Lindsay R., 2010, Peat bogs and carbon: a critical synthesis, 315
  7. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.1002.1003 · DOI
  8. Newson M. D., 1992, Peatland ecosystems and man: An impact assessment, 94
  9. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.1011.1059 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Lines in the landscape

    Clifford, C., Bieroza, M., Clarke, S. J., Pickard, A., Stratigos, M. J., Hill, M. J., Raheem, N., Tatariw, C., Wood, P. J., Arismendi, I., et al. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02699-y · Cited by 16

    Self-citation

Metadata

Authors
Holden, J., Green, S. M., Baird, A. J., Grayson, R. P., Dooling, G. P., Chapman, P. J., Evans, C. D., Peacock, M., & Swindles, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Bangor LL57 2UP UK
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Holden, Joseph
Venue
Hydrological Processes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-24
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
525-539
ISSN
  • 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1085
OpenAlex
W2521091755
Cited by
53
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hydrological Processes (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
ditch blocking, blanket peatlands, peatland restoration, surface runoff, catchment boundaries, peatland hydrology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review