Cited by 34Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesWater resources management and optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emerging technology can guide ecosystem restoration for future water security

Open access

Abstract

Water is the primary medium through which society will experience the effects of climate change. Altered precipitation patterns, enhanced evapotranspiration rates, loss of snow and ice, declines in groundwater storage, and increased risk of flooding and droughts will all have important implications for our water resources. In fact, we are already experiencing climate-related perturbations to the water cycle, as manifested through increases in temperatures and frequency of weather extremes across the globe (IPCC, 2021). However, a critical but often neglected aspect of predicting future hydrological change is recognizing the implications of historical land-use decisions that can act to either enhance or reduce the resilience of both the quality and quantity of water. Such land use decisions may create 'locked-in' effects reflecting the policies and path dependencies that underpin management inertia (Unruh & Carrillo-Hermosilla, 2006), as well as physical disturbances that caused hydrological changes that now are difficult to reverse (Lindenmayer et al., 2011). While water challenges are global, the water cycle in boreal regions is perhaps uniquely vulnerable due to cumulative effects of land use and climate warming, with the latter proceeding at faster rates at high latitudes (Buntgen et al., 2021). Climate change in the north is predicted to give rise to increasingly snow-free winters and warmer summers in boreal landscapes, which collectively will reduce water storage. Superimposed on these changes are barriers or inertia due to past land-use decisions, that may exacerbate pressures on ground- and surface waters. The most widespread management activity in many boreal countries is the historical ditching of wet soils. These ditches are constructed waterways that were dug, often by hand, to remove excess water affecting several million hectares of land, especially in Finland and Sweden, but also in many other northern countries (Strack, 2008; Figure 1). This resulted in improved forest growth and transformed wet soils and peatlands to productive forests, but also came with unwanted environmental consequences. Drainage ditches are sources of enhanced methane emissions (Peacock et al., 2021) and elevated dissolved organic carbon concentrations (Nieminen et al., 2021). Low water tables also lead to enhanced soil carbon mineralization and increased terrestrial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Evans et al., 2021). The biogeochemical properties of these extensions to the drainage network dramatically alter our understanding of running waters as sources of GHGs to the atmosphere and the overall provisions of ecosystem services. Most importantly, in an era increasingly affected by climate change, we now face conditions that create the opposite obstacle that the ditches aimed to solve—insufficient amounts of water—due to the expected increase in frequency, duration and severity of drought (Spinoni et al., 2018). Historical ditching may thus create enhanced vulnerability to drought in the future, which would require massive efforts to reverse. Documenting the cumulative effects of such local-scale management activities raises complex challenges that new technologies can help solve. In the case of ditching, the full scope of the problem has largely been hidden because existing models fail to map landscape hydrography when natural processes no longer have primacy over channel initiation. Nevertheless, with recent modelling advances, small-scale waterways can now be identified and mapped using high-resolution airborne laser scanning (ALS), combined with tools based on artificial intelligence (AI; Sit et al., 2020). We mapped small channels across all of Sweden with a deep neural network (Lidberg, Shekhar, et al., 2022). The deep learning model was based on ALS data and 1607 km of manually digitized ditches (Ågren et al., 2022). The ALS point cloud had a last return density of 0.5–1 points m−2 and a surface model with 1 m resolution was created by the Swedish land use and cadastral registration authority. A high pass median filter (HPMF) was applied to the surface model to emphasize short-range variability in the topography. The HPMF-algorithm was implemented in Whitebox tools (Lindsay, 2014) and operates by subtracting the value at the grid cell at the centre of the window from the median value in the surrounding neighbourhood with a kernel of five cells. Negative values indicate depressions while positive values indicate ridges. The digitized vector lines have no width so we utilized average ditch width from a field inventory where 2188 ditch channels were surveyed across Sweden. The average ditch width was 2 m with a standard deviation of 1.3 m. Instead of flagging all pixels within ~3 m of a vector line as ditch, we utilized the HPMF to create more natural ditch labels. Pixels within 3 m of a vector line and with a HPMF value less than −0.075 were flagged as ditch pixels. TensorFlow 2.6 was used to build an encoder–dec

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hyp.14729

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1061/JIDEDH/IRENG-9796 · DOI
  2. Lindsay J. B.(2014).The whitebox geospatial analysis tools project and open‐access GIS. InProceedings of the GIS Research UK 22nd Annual Conference(pp. 16–18). The University of Glasgow.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Lines in the landscape

    Clifford, C., Bieroza, M., Clarke, S. J., Pickard, A., Stratigos, M. J., Hill, M. J., Raheem, N., Tatariw, C., Wood, P. J., Arismendi, I., et al. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02699-y · Cited by 16

    Self-citation

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Laudon, H., Lidberg, W., Sponseller, R. A., Maher Hasselquist, E., Westphal, F., Östlund, L., Sandström, C., Järveoja, J., Peichl, M., & Ågren, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Department of Forest Ecology and Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden
  • Jönköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Laudon, Hjalmar
Venue
Hydrological Processes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1085
OpenAlex
W4304585006
Cited by
34
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hydrological Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2018.0259)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
boreal wetlands, drainage ditches, ecological restoration, water security, climate change impacts on water cycle, methane emissions, dissolved organic carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, wetland biogeochemistry, ecosystem services, peatlands, boreal forest, hydrological change, Finland, Sweden, climate change adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review