Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data

Tarboton, David G., Bras, Rafael L., Rodriguez‐Iturbe, Ignacio·1991·Hydrological Processes

Abstract

Channel networks with artibtrary drainage density or resolution can be extracted from digital elevation data. However, for digital elevation data derived networks to be useful they have to be extracted at the correct length scale or drainage density. Here we suggest a criterion for determining the appropriate drainage density at which to extract networks from digital elevation data. The criterion is basically to extract the highest resolution (highest drainage density) network that satisfies scaling laws that have traditionally been found to hold for channel networks. Procedures that use this criterion are presented and tested on 21 digital elevation data sets well distributed throughout the U.S.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hyp.3360050107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,209

Metadata

Authors
Tarboton, D. G., Bras, R. L., & Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I.
Venue
Hydrological Processes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
81-100
ISSN
  • 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1085
OpenAlex
W2083173052
Cited by
1,209
References
0
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.3360050107
The paper
Tarboton, D. G., Bras, R. L., & Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. (1991). On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.