The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The in(a/tan/β) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework
Abstract
Topographic indices may be used to attempt to approximate the likely distribution of variable source areas within a catchment. One such index has been applied widely using the distribution function catchment model, TOPMODEL, of Beven and Kirkby (1979). Validation of the spatial predictions of TOPMODEL may be affected by the algorithm used to calculate the model's topographic index. A number of digital terrain analysis (DTA) methods are therefore described for use in calculating the TOPMODEL topographic index, In(a/tanβ) (a = upslope contributing area per unit contour; tanβ = local slope angle). The spatial pattern and statistical distribution of the index is shown to be substantially different for different calculation procedures and differing pixel resolutions. It is shown that an interaction between hillslope contributing area accumulation and the analytical definition of the channel network has a major influence on calculated In(a/tanβ) index patterns. A number of DTA tests were performed to explore this interaction. The tests suggested that an ‘optimum’ channel initiation threshold (CIT) may be identified for positioning river headwaters in a raster digital terrain model (DTM). This threshold was found to be dependent on DTM grid resolution. Grid resolution is also suggested to have implications for the validation of spatial model predictions, implying that ‘optimum’ TOPMODEL parameter sets may be unique to the grid scale used in their derivation. Combining existing DTA procedures with an identified CIT, a procedure is described to vary the directional diffusion of contributing area accumulation with distance from the channel network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Self-citation
Cited by
Tarboton, D. G. (1997) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr03137 · Cited by 2,476
Beven, K., & Freer, J. (2001) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00421-8 · Cited by 2,189
Self-citationSeibert, J., & McGlynn, B. L. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2006wr005128 · Cited by 377
Uncertainties Associated with Digital Elevation Models for Hydrologic Applications: A Review
Wechsler, S. P. (2007) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-11-1481-2007 · Cited by 280
Thomas, J., Joseph, S., Thrivikramji, K. P., & Arunkumar, K. S. (2014) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2013.12.008 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., & Lamb, R.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-182
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2076714162
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The in(a/tan/β) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.3360090204
- The paper
- Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., & Lamb, R. (1995). The in(a/tan/β) index: How to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.