The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds
Abstract
Steady‐state infiltration measurements were made at mountainous sites in New Mexico and Colorado, USA, with volcanic and granitic soils after wildfires and at comparable unburned sites. We measured infiltration in the New Mexico volcanic soils under two vegetation types, ponderosa pine and mixed conifer, and in the Colorado granitic soils under ponderosa pine vegetation. These measurements were made within high‐severity burn areas using a portable infiltrometer with a 0·017 m 2 infiltration area and artificial rainfall rates ranging from 97 to 440 mm h−1. Steady‐state infiltration rates were less at all burned sites relative to unburned sites. The volcanic soil with ponderosa pine vegetation showed the greatest difference in infiltration rates with a ratio of steady‐state infiltration rate in burned sites to unburned soils equal to 0·15. Volcanic soils with mixed conifer vegetation had a ratio (burned to unburned soils) of at most 0·38, and granitic soils with ponderosa pine vegetation had a ratio of 0·38. Steady‐state infiltration rates on unburned volcanic and granitic soils with ponderosa pine vegetation are not statistically different. We present data on the particle‐size distribution at all the study sites and examples of wetting patterns produced during the infiltration experiments. Published in 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(1937) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/20.1.142a · Cited by 4,741
Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis
Neary, D. G., Klopatek, C. C., DeBano, L. F., & Ffolliott, P. F. (1999) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00032-8 · Cited by 1,596
Measures for Describing the Size Distribution of Sediments
Inman, D. L. (1952) · SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.1306/d42694db-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d · Cited by 943
Size Frequency Distributions of Sediments
Krumbein, W. C. (1934) · SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.1306/d4268eb9-2b26-11d7-8648000102c1865d · Cited by 741
Physical and chemical characteristics of wood ash
Etiégni, L., & Campbell, A. G. (1991) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/0960-8524(91)90207-z · Cited by 704
Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora
Brown, J. K., & Smith, J. K. (2000) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-gtr-42-v2 · Cited by 575
Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art
DeBano, L. F. (1981) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-46 · Cited by 507
Fire effects on infiltration rates after prescribed fire in Northern Rocky Mountain forests, USA
Robichaud, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00196-7 · Cited by 465
The effects of fire and water repellency on infiltration and runoff under Mediterranean type forest
Imeson, A. C., Verstraten, J. M., van Mulligen, E. J., & Sevink, J. (1992) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/0341-8162(92)90008-y · Cited by 372
Cited by
Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review
Certini, G. (2005) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8 · Cited by 2,944
Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent
Shakesby, R. A., & Doerr, S. H. (2006) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,346
Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects
Bodí, M. B., Martin, D. A., Balfour, V. N., Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Pereira, P., Cerdà, A., & Mataix-Solera, J. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.007 · Cited by 714
Self-citationFire effects on soil aggregation: A review
Mataix-Solera, J., Cerdà, A., Arcenegui, V., Jordán, A., & Zavala, L. M. (2011) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.08.002 · Cited by 701
Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes
Moody, J. A., Shakesby, R. A., Robichaud, P. R., Cannon, S. H., & Martin, D. A. (2013) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004 · Cited by 693
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, D. A., & Moody, J. A.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10-25
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2893-2903
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W2142370540
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hyp.380
- The paper
- Martin, D. A., & Moody, J. A. (2001). Comparison of soil infiltration rates in burned and unburned mountainous watersheds. Hydrological Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.