Cited by 1,596Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsRangeland and Wildlife Management

Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis

Neary, Daniel G, Klopatek, Carole C, DeBano, Leonard F, Ffolliott, Peter F·1999·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

The overall effects of fire on ecosystems are complex, ranging from the reduction or elimination of aboveground biomass to impacts on belowground physical, chemical and microbial mediated processes. Since a key component of overall ecosystem sustainability occurs belowground, recovery is tied to the soil's physical, chemical, and biological functions and processes. Depending on several fire severity measures, changes in belowground components can be either beneficial or deleterious to the entire ecosystem. Low-impact burning can promote a herbaceous flora, increase plant available nutrients, and thin over-crowded forests, all of which can foster healthy systems. Severe fires can often cause changes in successional rates, alter above- and belowground species composition, generate volatilization of nutrients and ash entrainment in smoke columns, produce rapid or decreased mineralization rates, alter C : N ratios, and result in subsequent nutrient losses through accelerated erosion, leaching or denitrification. In addition, changes in soil hydrologic functioning, degradation of soil physical properties, decreases in micro- and macrofauna, and alterations in microbial populations and associated processes can occur. The direct effect of fire on belowground systems is a result of the burning severity, which integrates aboveground fuel loading (live and dead), soil moisture and subsequent soil temperatures, and duration of the burn. The time for recovery of belowground systems will…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00032-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neary, D. G., Klopatek, C. C., DeBano, L. F., & Ffolliott, P. F.
Affiliations
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Neary, Daniel G
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
122
Issue
1-2
Pages
51-71
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971981820
Cited by
1,596
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 77
FWCI
11.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
fire effects, soil sustainability, soil nutrient mineralization, nutrient leaching, denitrification, soil microbial communities, soil fauna, soil hydrology, soil physical properties, post-fire recovery, ecological succession, land use history, ecosystem sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review