The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling of stormwater biofilters under random hydrologic variability: a case study of a car park at Monash University, Victoria (Australia)
Abstract
Biofiltration systems represent an effective technology for the management of urban stormwater runoff volumes and quality. The performance of these systems, although largely dependent on their physical characteristics, is also strongly affected by the natural variability of runoff occurrence and volumes. This article presents a model that describes the statistical behaviour of the main variables involved in the water balance of a biofiltration system, given its main physical properties (filter media and vegetation types) and accounting for the natural inflow variability in terms of occurrence and water volumes. The model permits the analytical derivation of the long‐term (e.g. annual) probability density function of the soil water content in the filter media and the estimation of the main statistics of water fluxes, that is, outflow, evapotranspiration and overflow. By relating the soil water content in the filter media before inflow events to the outflow total nitrogen concentrations, the model also gives estimates of the statistics of nitrogen removal performance as a function of inflow variability. The model was tested against field data collected at a stormwater biofiltration system in Melbourne, Australia. The model could be used to rapidly assess the hydrologic and nitrogen treatment performance of alternative applications of biofiltration for stormwater management across a range of climates. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, transpiration is dependent upon root uptake of water, which decreases with depth, and varies with plants and climate (Daly et al., 2012; Tamai, 1998).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Daly et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Benjamin JR, 1970, Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers
- 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.023 · DOI
- Cox DR, 1965, The theory of stochastic processes
- CRCCH, 2005, Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation (MUSIC) Version 3
- 10.1029/2005WR004606 · DOI
- 10.1029/2008GL036933 · DOI
- 10.1021/es053327e · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109) · DOI
- 10.2175/106143001X138624 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z · DOI
- FAWB, 2009, Guidelines for Filter Media in Biofiltration Systems
- 10.2166/wst.2007.751 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600) · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403) · DOI
- 10.2175/106143003X141169 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00005-7 · DOI
- Leopold LB, 1968, Hydrology for urban land planning: A guidebook on the hydrological effects of urban land use, 18
- 10.1002/hyp.7938 · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.6732 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(352) · DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.7373 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00006-9 · DOI
- Rauch W, 2007, KAREN—User Manual
- 10.1080/15226510902767114 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036 · DOI · Paper page
- Wong THF, 2006, Australian Runoff Quality: A Guide To Water Sensitive Urban Design
- ZingerY FletcherTD DeleticA.2007.The effect of various intermittent dry‐wet cycles of nitrogen removal capacity in biofiltration systems.13th International Rainwater catchment Systems Conference and 5th International Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference Sydney Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Daly, E., Deletic, A., Hatt, B. E., & Fletcher, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Department of Civil Engineering, Centre for Water Sensitive Cities Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Daly, E.
- Venue
- Hydrological Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-24
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3416-3424
- ISSN
- 0885-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1085
- OpenAlex
- W1548904075
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hydrological Processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Keywords
- stormwater biofilters, urban stormwater management, hydrological variability, inflow variability, soil moisture, probability density function, nitrogen removal, evapotranspiration, overflow, water balance modeling, filter media, vegetation types
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review