Restoring streams in an urbanizing world
Abstract
Summary: 1. The world's population is increasingly urban, and streams and rivers, as the low lying points of the landscape, are especially sensitive to and profoundly impacted by the changes associated with urbanization and suburbanization of catchments. 2. River restoration is an increasingly popular management strategy for improving the physical and ecological conditions of degraded urban streams. In urban catchments, management activities as diverse as stormwater management, bank stabilisation, channel reconfiguration and riparian replanting may be described as river restoration projects. 3. Restoration in urban streams is both more expensive and more difficult than restoration in less densely populated catchments. High property values and finely subdivided land and dense human infrastructure (e.g. roads, sewer lines) limit the spatial extent of urban river restoration options, while stormwaters and the associated sediment and pollutant loads may limit the potential for restoration projects to reverse degradation. 4. To be effective, urban stream restoration efforts must be integrated within broader catchment management strategies. A key scientific and management challenge is to establish criteria for determining when the design options for urban river restoration are so constrained that a return towards reference or pre‐urbanization conditions is not realistic or feasible and when river restoration presents a viable and effective strategy for improving the ecological condition of these degraded ecosystems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of significant ecological improvements may reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity.
“but may also reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity (Bernhardt et al. 2005;Palmer et al. 2005;Bernhardt and Palmer 2007).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Bernhardt and Palmer 2007
Cites
N retention and transformation in urban streams
Grimm, N. B., Sheibley, R. W., Crenshaw, C. L., Dahm, C. N., Roach, W. J., & Zeglin, L. H. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-027.1 · Cited by 198 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While this has been suggested as a factor that may limit community metabolism and nutrient retention in urban systems (Grimm et al., 2005; Meyer et al., 2005; M. A. Palmer, Fig.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?
Lin, B. B., & Fuller, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12118 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Morandi, B., Piégay, H., Lamouroux, N., & Vaudor, L. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.010 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Clifford, C., & Heffernan, J. (2018) · Water · doi:10.3390/w10081096 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Assessing a riverfront rehabilitation project using the comprehensive index of public accessibility
Che, Y., Yang, K., Chen, T., & Xu, Q. (2012) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.12.008 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Urban stream renovation: incorporating societal objectives to achieve ecological improvements
Smith, R. F., Hawley, R. J., Neale, M. W., Vietz, G. J., Diaz-Pascacio, E., Herrmann, J., Lovell, A. C., Prescott, C., Rios-Touma, B., Smith, B., et al. (2016) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/685096 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Zingraff-Hamed, A., Greulich, S., Wantzen, K., & Pauleit, S. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9030206 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Urban and rural river restoration in France: A typology
Zingraff‐Hamed, A., Greulich, S., Pauleit, S., & Wantzen, K. M. (2017) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12526 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Percepção social no programa de restauração de cursos d'água urbanos em Belo Horizonte
Macedo, D. R., & Magalhães Junior, A. P. (2011) · Sociedade & Natureza · doi:10.1590/s1982-45132011000100005 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- BERNHARDT, E. S., & PALMER, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
- Corresponding author
- BERNHARDT, EMILY S.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 738-751
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2067768185
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 17.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Freshwater Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Keywords
- urban river restoration, urbanization, river restoration, stormwater management, channel reconfiguration, watershed management, restoration feasibility, ecological conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review