Cited by 525Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Restoring streams in an urbanizing world

BERNHARDT, EMILY S., PALMER, MARGARET A.·2007·Freshwater Biology

Abstract

Summary: 1. The world's population is increasingly urban, and streams and rivers, as the low lying points of the landscape, are especially sensitive to and profoundly impacted by the changes associated with urbanization and suburbanization of catchments. 2. River restoration is an increasingly popular management strategy for improving the physical and ecological conditions of degraded urban streams. In urban catchments, management activities as diverse as stormwater management, bank stabilisation, channel reconfiguration and riparian replanting may be described as river restoration projects. 3. Restoration in urban streams is both more expensive and more difficult than restoration in less densely populated catchments. High property values and finely subdivided land and dense human infrastructure (e.g. roads, sewer lines) limit the spatial extent of urban river restoration options, while stormwaters and the associated sediment and pollutant loads may limit the potential for restoration projects to reverse degradation. 4. To be effective, urban stream restoration efforts must be integrated within broader catchment management strategies. A key scientific and management challenge is to establish criteria for determining when the design options for urban river restoration are so constrained that a return towards reference or pre‐urbanization conditions is not realistic or feasible and when river restoration presents a viable and effective strategy for improving the ecological condition of these degraded ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of significant ecological improvements may reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity.

    “but may also reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity (Bernhardt et al. 2005;Palmer et al. 2005;Bernhardt and Palmer 2007).”

Cites

  • N retention and transformation in urban streams

    Grimm, N. B., Sheibley, R. W., Crenshaw, C. L., Dahm, C. N., Roach, W. J., & Zeglin, L. H. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-027.1 · Cited by 198 · cited 3× · see citing works

    “While this has been suggested as a factor that may limit community metabolism and nutrient retention in urban systems (Grimm et al., 2005; Meyer et al., 2005; M. A. Palmer, Fig.”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BERNHARDT, E. S., & PALMER, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
Corresponding author
BERNHARDT, EMILY S.
Venue
Freshwater Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-02
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
738-751
ISSN
  • 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2427
OpenAlex
W2067768185
Cited by
525
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
FWCI
17.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Freshwater Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
urban river restoration, urbanization, river restoration, stormwater management, channel reconfiguration, watershed management, restoration feasibility, ecological conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review