The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of action of certolizumab pegol (CDP870): In vitro comparison with other anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) have demonstrated significant efficacy in chronic inflammatory diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD). To further elucidate the mechanisms of action of these agents, we compared the anti-TNFalpha agents certolizumab pegol, infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept in several in vitro systems. METHODS: The ability of each anti-TNFalpha agent to neutralize soluble and membrane-bound TNFalpha; mediate cytotoxicity, affect apoptosis of activated human peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes; induce degranulation of human peripheral blood granulocytes, and modulate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced interleukin (IL)-1beta production by human monocytes was measured in vitro. RESULTS: All 4 agents neutralized soluble TNFalpha and bound to and neutralized membrane TNFalpha. Infliximab and adalimumab were comparable in their ability to mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and to increase the proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis and the level of granulocyte degranulation. Etanercept generally mediated these effects to a lesser degree, while certolizumab pegol gave similar results to the control reagents. LPS-induced IL-1beta production was inhibited by certolizumab pegol, infliximab, and adalimumab, but only partially inhibited by etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the other anti-TNFalpha agents tested, certolizumab pegol did not mediate increased levels of apoptosis in any of the in vitro assays used, suggesting that these mechanisms are not essential for the efficacy of anti-TNFalpha agents in CD. As certolizumab pegol, infliximab, and adalimumab, but not etanercept, almost completely inhibited LPS-induced IL-1beta release from monocytes, inhibition of cytokine production may be important for efficacy of anti-TNFalpha agents in CD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease
Neurath, M. F. (2014) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3661 · Cited by 2,706
Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art
de Souza, H. S. P., & Fiocchi, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2015.186 · Cited by 1,551
Turecek, P. L., Bossard, M. J., Schoetens, F., & Ivens, I. A. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.015 · Cited by 733
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies
Keizer, R. J., Huitema, A. D. R., Schellens, J. H. M., & Beijnen, J. H. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11531280-000000000-00000 · Cited by 725
Tubach, F., Salmon, D., Ravaud, P., Allanore, Y., Goupille, P., Bréban, M., Pallot‐Prades, B., Pouplin, S., Sacchi, A., Chichemanian, R. M., et al. (2009) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.24632 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Nesbitt, A., Fossati, G., Bergin, M., Stephens, P., Stephens, S., Foulkes, R., Brown, D., Robinson, M., & Bourne, T.
- Venue
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1323-1332
- ISSN
- 1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154515402
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of action of certolizumab pegol (CDP870): In vitro comparison with other anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ibd.20225
- The paper
- Nesbitt, A., Fossati, G., Bergin, M., Stephens, P., Stephens, S., Foulkes, R., Brown, D., Robinson, M., & Bourne, T. (2007). Mechanism of action of certolizumab pegol (CDP870): In vitro comparison with other anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.20225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.