Cited by 114Inflammatory Bowel DiseasePsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the oral interleukin-12/23 inhibitor apilimod mesylate for treatment of active Crohn’s disease

Sands, Bruce E., Jacobson, Eric W., Sylwestrowicz, Thomas, Younes, Ziad, Dryden, Gerald, Fedorak, Richard, Greenbloom, Susan·2010·Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract

Background Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23) are inflammatory cytokines linked to the Th-1 and Th-17 phenotypes associated with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the activity and safety of apilimod mesylate (formerly STA-5326), an oral IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor, in patients with active CD. Methods We performed a multicenter, Phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of apilimod mesylate in treating 220 adult patients with moderate-to-severe CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score 220-450). Patients were stratified according to C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and corticosteroid use and were randomly assigned to receive placebo or apilimod mesylate 50 mg daily or 100 mg daily. The study was divided into an induction phase (43 days) and a maintenance phase (125 days). The primary analysis involved a comparison of the proportion of patients experiencing clinical response, defined as at least a 100-point decrease in CDAI score from baseline at day 29. Data on adverse events were also collected. Results In all, 220 of the planned 282 patients were enrolled when the Data Monitoring Committee determined that the drug was not efficacious as a treatment and closed enrollment. A clinical response was experienced by 18 patients (24.7%) in the 50-mg daily (QD) group (n = 73) and 19 patients (25.7%) in the 100 mg QD group (n = 74), as compared with 21 patients (28.8%) in the placebo group (n = 73) on day 29 (P = 0.71…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ibd.21159

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sands, B. E., Jacobson, E. W., Sylwestrowicz, T., Younes, Z., Dryden, G., Fedorak, R., & Greenbloom, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Synta Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • 5Gastroenterology Center of the MidSouth, German Town, Tennessee
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • 8Toronto Digestive Disease Associates, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Venue
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Published
2009-11-16
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
1209-1218
ISSN
  • 1078-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4844
OpenAlex
W1989963371
Cited by
114
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
IL-12/23 inhibitors
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Crohn Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrazones, Male, Middle Aged, Morpholines, Pyrimidines, Quality of Life, Remission Induction, Triazines, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Interleukin-12, Interleukin-23, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review