The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framework for traits-based assessment in ecotoxicology
Open accessAbstract
A key challenge in ecotoxicology is to assess the potential risks of chemicals to the wide range of species in the environment on the basis of laboratory toxicity data derived from a limited number of species. These species are then assumed to be suitable surrogates for a wider class of related taxa. For example, Daphnia spp. are used as the indicator species for freshwater aquatic invertebrates. Extrapolation from these datasets to natural communities poses a challenge because the extent to which test species are representative of their various taxonomic groups is often largely unknown, and different taxonomic groups and chemicals are variously represented in the available datasets. Moreover, it has been recognized that physiological and ecological factors can each be powerful determinants of vulnerability to chemical stress, thus differentially influencing toxicant effects at the population and community level. Recently it was proposed that detailed study of species traits might eventually permit better understanding, and thus prediction, of the potential for adverse effects of chemicals to a wider range of organisms than those amenable for study in the laboratory. This line of inquiry stems in part from the ecology literature, in which species traits are being used for improved understanding of how communities are constructed, as well as how communities might respond to, and recover from, disturbance (see other articles in this issue). In the present work, we develop a framework for the application of traits-based assessment. The framework is based on the population vulnerability conceptual model of Van Straalen in which vulnerability is determined by traits that can be grouped into 3 major categories, i.e., external exposure, intrinsic sensitivity, and population sustainability. Within each of these major categories, we evaluate specific traits as well as how they could contribute to the assessment of the potential effects of a toxicant on an organism. We then develop an example considering bioavailability to explore how traits could be used mechanistically to estimate vulnerability. A preliminary inventory of traits for use in ecotoxicology is included; this also identifies the availability of data to quantify those traits, in addition to an indication of the strength of linkage between the trait and the affected process. Finally, we propose a way forward for the further development of traits-based approaches in ecotoxicology. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2011;7:172–186. © 2011 SETAC
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Mechanisms of Estrogen Action: Selective Ligands and Receptor Pharmacology
Katzenellenbogen, B. S., Choi, I., Delage-Mourroux, R., Ediger, T. R., Martini, P. G. V., Montano, M., Sun, J., Weis, K., & Katzenellenbogen, J. A. (2000) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(00)00104-7 · Cited by 289
Intestinal absorption and biomagnification of organic contaminants in fish, wildlife, and humans
Kelly, B. C., Gobas, F. A. P. C., & McLachlan, M. S. (2004) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/03-545 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Nilin, J., Pestana, J. L. T., Ferreira, N. G., Loureiro, S., Costa-Lotufo, L. V., & Soares, A. M. V. M. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.107 · Cited by 955
Medicating the environment: assessing risks of pharmaceuticals to wildlife and ecosystems
Arnold, K. E., Brown, A. R., Ankley, G. T., & Sumpter, J. P. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0569 · Cited by 441
Moe, S. J., De Schamphelaere, K., Clements, W. H., Sorensen, M. T., Van den Brink, P. J., & Liess, M. (2013) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2045 · Cited by 344
Debecker, S., & Stoks, R. (2019) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1332 · Cited by 72
Diepens, N. J., Koelmans, A. A., Baveco, H., van den Brink, P. J., van den Heuvel-Greve, M. J., & Brock, T. C. M. (2016) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/398_2015_5004 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubach, M. N., Ashauer, R., Buchwalter, D. B., De Lange, H., Hamer, M., Preuss, T. G., Töpke, K., & Maund, S. J.
- Venue
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-186
- ISSN
- 1551-3777 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-3793
- OpenAlex
- W2061212624
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framework for traits-based assessment in ecotoxicology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ieam.105
- The paper
- Rubach, M. N., Ashauer, R., Buchwalter, D. B., De Lange, H., Hamer, M., Preuss, T. G., Töpke, K., & Maund, S. J. (2011). Framework for traits-based assessment in ecotoxicology. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.