The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Human activities both depend upon and have consequences on the environment. Environmental risk assessment (ERA) is a process of estimating the probability and consequences of the adverse effects of human activities and other stressors on the environment. Bayesian networks (BNs) can synthesize different types of knowledge and explicitly account for the probabilities of different scenarios, therefore offering a useful tool for ERA. Their use in formal ERA practice has not been evaluated, however, despite their increasing popularity in environmental modeling. This paper reviews the use of BNs in ERA based on peer-reviewed publications. Following a systematic mapping protocol, we identified studies in which BNs have been used in an environmental risk context and evaluated the scope, technical aspects, and use of the models and their results. The review shows that BNs have been applied in ERA, particularly in recent years, and that there is room to develop both the model implementation and participatory modeling practices. Based on this review and the authors’ experience, we outline general guidelines and development ideas for using BNs in ERA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:62–78. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) KEY POINTS This paper reviews the use of Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessments (ERA) based on peer-reviewed publications. The review shows that BNs have been applied in ERA particularly in recent years and that there is room to develop both the model implementation and participatory modeling practices. Based on this review and the authors' experience, we outline general guidelines and development ideas for using BNs in ERA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“In the case of “wicked” socioenvironmental decision‐making problems with no unambiguously best solution (Rittel and Webber 1973), a transparent systemic model such as BN could reveal among what aspects we are actually choosing.”
BackgroundA General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
Jensen, F. V., & Nielsen, T. D. (2007) · Information Science and Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2 · Cited by 4,129
Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x · Cited by 3,885
Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks
Pearl, J. (1986) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90072-x · Cited by 2,127
Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning
Barber, D. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804779 · Cited by 1,631
Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities
O'Hagan, A., Buck, C. E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., Jenkinson, D. J., Oakley, J. E., & Rakow, T. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470033312 · Cited by 1,550
Applied Statistical Decision Theory.
Roberts, H. V., Raiffa, H., & Schlaifer, R. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2282452 · Cited by 1,443
Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling
Uusitalo, L. (2007) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 · Cited by 1,118
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaikkonen, L., Parviainen, T., Rahikainen, M., Uusitalo, L., & Lehikoinen, A.
- Venue
- Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-08-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-78
- ISSN
- 1551-3777 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-3793
- OpenAlex
- W3080654259
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ieam.4332
- The paper
- Kaikkonen, L., Parviainen, T., Rahikainen, M., Uusitalo, L., & Lehikoinen, A. (2020). Bayesian Networks in Environmental Risk Assessment: A Review. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.