The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clonality of multifocal urothelial carcinomas: 10 years of molecular genetic studies
Open accessAbstract
Multifocal occurrence and frequent recurrence are characteristic features of urothelial carcinomas of both the urinary bladder and the upper urinary tract. To describe the clonal nature of these tumors, 2 theories have been proposed. The monoclonality hypothesis describes the multiple tumors as descendants of a single genetically transformed cell spreading throughout the urothelium. In contrast, field cancerization caused by carcinogen exposure of the urothelium may lead to independent development of synchronous or metachronous nonrelated tumors at different sites of the urothelial tract. In the last 10 years, a multitude of molecular genetic studies have investigated the clonality of multifocal urothelial carcinomas. The majority of studies revealed a monoclonal origin of the multiple tumors. However, most of these studies investigated advanced invasive carcinomas. A small but significant proportion of multifocal urothelial carcinomas appear to arise from different clones, supporting the field‐cancerization hypothesis. Oligoclonal tumors might be more common in precursor lesions and early tumor stages. The frequent monoclonality found in patients with advanced tumors could be due to outgrowth of 1 tumor cell clone with specific genetic alterations. Two important mechanisms appear to be important for the spread of malignant cells: intraluminal seeding and intraepithelial migration. Investigation of the entire urothelial lining in patients with urothelial tumors should provide further insight into the development of multifocal urothelial carcinomas. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nowell, P. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.959840 · Cited by 6,471
Patterns of copulatory behavior in male mammals
Dewsbury, D. A. (1972) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/407097 · Cited by 330
Cited by
The global burden of urinary bladder cancer
Parkin, D. M. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology · doi:10.1080/03008880802285032 · Cited by 357
Catto, J. W. F., Azzouzi, A.-R., Rehman, I., Feeley, K. M., Cross, S. S., Amira, N., Fromont, G., Sibony, M., Cussenot, O., Meuth, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.163 · Cited by 316
Seisen, T., Granger, B., Colin, P., Léon, P., Utard, G., Renard-Penna, R., Compérat, E., Mozer, P., Cussenot, O., Shariat, S. F., et al. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.035 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Hafner, C., Knuechel, R., Stoehr, R., & Hartmann, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07-25
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2021492361
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clonality of multifocal urothelial carcinomas: 10 years of molecular genetic studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.10544
- The paper
- Hafner, C., Knuechel, R., Stoehr, R., & Hartmann, A. (2002). Clonality of multifocal urothelial carcinomas: 10 years of molecular genetic studies. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.