Cited by 113Genital Health and DiseaseCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections research

Condom use promotes regression of human papillomavirus-associated penile lesions in male sexual partners of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Open access
Bleeker, Maaike C.G., Hogewoning, Cornelis J.A., Voorhorst, Feja J., van den Brule, Adriaan J.C., Snijders, Peter J.F., Starink, Theo M., Berkhof, Johannes, Meijer, Chris J.L.M.·2003·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Penile HPV-associated lesions are frequently seen in male sexual partners of women with CIN. The natural course and clinical significance of these lesions are unclear. Women with CIN and their male sexual partners were randomized for condom use (condom group n = 68, noncondom group n = 68). Males were screened for the presence of penile lesions, i.e., flat lesions, papular lesions and condylomata acuminata, and of HPV in their penile swabs by PCR testing. Median follow-up time was 13.1 months (range 2.9-57.4). The outcome of our study was clinical regression of penile lesions defined as disappearance of lesions at penoscopy. Potentially prognostic factors, i.e., HPV status, lesion type and age, were studied as well. Outcomes were assessed in 57 men of the condom group and in 43 men of the noncondom group. Condom use shortened the median time to regression of flat penile lesions (7.4 months condom group vs. 13.9 months noncondom group; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7). This effect was not found for papular lesions (HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.8). HPV-negative men showed a significantly shorter median time to regression of flat lesions (3.8 months) compared to men with either HPV-positive status (8.5 months; HR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) or inconsistent HPV status (13.1 months; HR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6). Regression of flat penile lesions is HPV-dependent and accelerated by condom use. This effect is probably the result of blocking viral transmission between sexual partners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.11473

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consistent and correct use of latex condoms reduces the risk for HPV infection and HPV-associated diseases, genital herpes, syphilis, and chancroid when the infected area or site of potential exposure is covered.

    “In addition, consistent and correct use of latex condoms reduces the risk for HPV infection and HPV-associated diseases, genital herpes, syphilis, and chancroid when the infected area or site of potential exposure is covered (23–27).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion reports that condom use shortened the time to regression of HPV-associated flat penile lesions and recommends condoms to reduce HPV infections and possible complications. It does not address genital herpes, syphilis, or chancroid, or establish the claim's conditions of correct latex-condom use and coverage of the exposure site. Page numbers are not available in the supplied copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aynaud O, Ionesco M, Barrasso R. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Specific clinical features correlate with histologic and virologic find- ings. Cancer 1994;74:1762-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bleeker, M. C. G., Hogewoning, C. J. A., Voorhorst, F. J., van den Brule, A. J. C., Snijders, P. J. F., Starink, T. M., Berkhof, J., & Meijer, C. J. L. M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis (NL)
Corresponding author
Meijer, Chris J.L.M.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-12
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
804-810
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1989124603
Cited by
113
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
condom use, human papillomavirus, penile lesions, genital warts, papular skin lesions, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, male sexual partners, lesion regression, HPV transmission, sexual transmission prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Diseases, Time Factors, Tumor Virus Infections, Condoms, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review