The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? the international perspective
Open accessAbstract
At least 15 types of HPV have been associated with cervical cancer, but current HPV vaccines confer only type‐specific immunity. To determine geographic variations in the HPV type distribution in cervical cancer, we carried out a pooled analysis of data from an international survey of HPV types in cervical cancer and from a multicenter case‐control study, both co‐coordinated by the IARC. Study cases were 3,607 women with incident, histologically confirmed cervical cancer recruited in 25 countries. HPV DNA detection and typing in cervical cells or biopsies were centrally done using PCR assays. Estimates of the potential number of cases prevented by HPV type‐specific vaccines and changes in the validity of different HPV screening cocktails were calculated. HPV DNA was detected in 96% of specimens, and 30 different types were detected. The 15 most common types were, in descending order of frequency, 16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 52, 58, 35, 59, 56, 39, 51, 73, 68 and 66. Higher than average proportions of type 16 were found in northern Africa, of type 18 in south Asia, of type 45 in sub‐Saharan Africa and of type 31 in Central/South America. A vaccine including types 16 and 18 could potentially prevent 71% of cervical cancers worldwide, but its impact with regard to the percentage of cases potentially prevented would be higher in Asia and Europe/North America. In contrast, a vaccine containing the 7 most common HPV types would prevent about 87% of cervical cancers worldwide, with little regional variation. The impact of modifying the number of types in the screening cocktail tests would be small and probably irrelevant for screening programs. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Sanjose, S., Quint, W. G., Alemany, L., Geraets, D. T., Klaustermeier, J. E., Lloveras, B., Tous, S., Felix, A., Bravo, L. E., Shin, H.-R., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70230-8 · Cited by 2,728
Self-citationHarper, D. M., Franco, E. L., Wheeler, C., Ferris, D. G., Jenkins, D., Schuind, A., Zahaf, T., Innis, B., Naud, P., De Carvalho, N. S., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17398-4 · Cited by 1,643
Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer
Muñoz, N., Castellsagué, X., de González, A. B., & Gissmann, L. (2006) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.115 · Cited by 1,355
Self-citationMolecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer
Doorbar, J. (2006) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20050369 · Cited by 1,072
Arbyn, M., Anttila, A., Jordan, J., Ronco, G., Schenck, U., Segnan, N., Wiener, H., Herbert, A., & von Karsa, L. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp471 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., Castellsagué, X., Díaz, M., de Sanjose, S., Hammouda, D., Shah, K. V., & Meijer, C. J. L. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-12
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-285
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2139349670
- Cited by
- 1,104
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? the international perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.20244
- The paper
- Muñoz, N., Bosch, F. X., Castellsagué, X., Díaz, M., de Sanjose, S., Hammouda, D., Shah, K. V., & Meijer, C. J. L. M. (2004). Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? the international perspective. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.