Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of gene expression in cancer cell lines identifies candidate markers for pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis

Open access
Missiaglia, Edoardo, Blaveri, Ekaterini, Terris, Benoit, Wang, Yao‐He, Costello, Eithne, Neoptolemos, John P., Crnogorac‐Jurcevic, Tatjana, Lemoine, Nicholas R.·2004·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive type of malignancy and the prognosis for disease presenting typically at a late stage is extremely poor. A comprehensive understanding of its molecular genetics is required in order to develop new approaches to clinical management. To date, serial analysis of gene expression and more recently oligo/cDNA microarray technologies have been employed in order to identify genes involved in pancreatic neoplasia that can be developed as diagnostic markers and drug targets for this dismal disease. This study describes the expression profile obtained from 20 pancreatic cell lines using cDNA microarrays containing 9,932 human gene elements. Numerous genes were identified as being differentially expressed, some of which have been previously implicated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (S100P, S100A4, prostate stem cell antigen, lipocalin 2, claudins 3 and 4, trefoil factors 1 and 2) as well as several novel genes. The differentially expressed genes identified are involved in a variety of cellular functions, including control of transcription, regulation of the cell cycle, proteolysis, cell adhesion and signaling. Validation of our array results was performed by exploring the SAGEmap database and by immunohistochemistry for a selection of 4 genes that have not previously been studied in pancreatic cancer: anterior gradient 2 homologue (Xenopus laevis), insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 3 and 4 and Forkhead box J1. Immunostaining was performed using pancreas‐specific tissue microarrays containing core biopsies from 305 clinical specimens. In addition, using statistical group comparison and hierarchical clustering, a selection of genes was identified that may be linked to the site of metastasis from which these cell lines were isolated. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.20376

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Missiaglia, E., Blaveri, E., Terris, B., Wang, Y., Costello, E., Neoptolemos, J. P., Crnogorac‐Jurcevic, T., & Lemoine, N. R.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06-02
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
100-112
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1982162547
Cited by
164
References
3
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of gene expression in cancer cell lines identifies candidate markers for pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.20376
The paper
Missiaglia, E., Blaveri, E., Terris, B., Wang, Y., Costello, E., Neoptolemos, J. P., Crnogorac‐Jurcevic, T., & Lemoine, N. R. (2004). Analysis of gene expression in cancer cell lines identifies candidate markers for pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20376

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.