The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gastric cancer screening and subsequent risk of gastric cancer: A large‐scale population‐based cohort study, with a 13‐year follow‐up in Japan
Open accessAbstract
We prospectively investigated the association between gastric cancer screening and subsequent risk of gastric cancer in a large‐scale population‐based prospective cohort study, with a 13‐year follow‐up in Japan. Data were analyzed from a population‐based cohort of 42,150 (20,326 men and 21,824 women) subjects. Approximately 36% of subjects reported that they had undergone screening photofluorography during the preceding 12 months, and were regarded as the screened group. A total of 179 gastric cancer deaths and 636 incident gastric cancers were identified during the follow‐up period. We observed a 2‐fold decrease in gastric cancer mortality in screened versus unscreened subjects (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.36–0.74). The extent of the reduction in mortality for gastric cancer was greater than in death from all causes excluding gastric cancer (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.65–0.78). A significant decrease in the incidence of advanced gastric cancer was observed in screened subjects (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.58–0.96), although the overall incidence rate did not differ significantly between the screened and unscreened subjects (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.90–1.25). In age‐stratified analyses, a significant reduction in gastric cancer mortality was seen in screened subjects aged 40–49 years at baseline, compared with a lesser reduction in screened subjects aged 50–59 (RR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13–0.72; and RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.40–0.88, respectively). These findings suggest that gastric cancer screening may be associated with a reduced risk of mortality from gastric cancer. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jemal, A., Bray, F., Center, M. M., Ferlay, J., Ward, E., & Forman, D. (2011) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20107 · Cited by 54,679
de Vries, A. C., van Grieken, N. C. T., Looman, C. W. N., Casparie, M. K., de Vries, E., Meijer, G. A., & Kuipers, E. J. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.071 · Cited by 848
The Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening
Hamashima, C., Shibuya, D., Yamazaki, H., Inoue, K., Fukao, A., Saito, H., & Sobue, T. (2008) · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1093/jjco/hyn017 · Cited by 403
Zhang, X., Li, M., Chen, S., Hu, J., Guo, Q., Liu, R., Zheng, H., Jin, Z., Yuan, Y., Xi, Y., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.026 · Cited by 328
Ando, T., Yoshida, T., Enomoto, S., Asada, K., Tatematsu, M., Ichinose, M., Sugiyama, T., & Ushijima, T. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24219 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K., Inoue, M., Otani, T., Iwasaki, M., Sasazuki, S., & Tsugane, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-05
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2315-2321
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W2041614937
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastric cancer screening and subsequent risk of gastric cancer: A large‐scale population‐based cohort study, with a 13‐year follow‐up in Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.21664
- The paper
- Lee, K., Inoue, M., Otani, T., Iwasaki, M., Sasazuki, S., & Tsugane, S. (2006). Gastric cancer screening and subsequent risk of gastric cancer: A large‐scale population‐based cohort study, with a 13‐year follow‐up in Japan. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.