Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statins revert doxorubicin resistance via nitric oxide in malignant mesothelioma

Riganti, Chiara, Orecchia, Sara, Pescarmona, Gianpiero, Betta, Pier Giacomo, Ghigo, Dario, Bosia, Amalia·2006·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Human malignant mesothelioma (HMM) is resistant to many anticancer drugs, including doxorubicin. Mevastatin and simvastatin, 2 inhibitors of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase, potentiated the intracellular accumulation and the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in HMM cells constitutively expressing P‐glycoprotein and multidrug resistance‐associated protein 3. This effect of statins was nitric oxide (NO)‐dependent, since it was reverted by either an NO synthase inhibitor or an NO scavenging system. The NO synthase up‐regulation in HMM and other cells is known to be associated with the activation of the transcription factor NF‐κB: in HMM cells statins increased the NF‐κB translocation into the nucleus, decreased the level of the NF‐κB inhibitor IkBα and increased the phosphorylation/activation of IkB kinase α (IKKα). IKKα is under the negative control exerted by RhoA in its prenylated (active) form: incubation of HMM cells with statins lowered the amount of active RhoA and the level of Rho‐associated kinase activity. All statins' effects were reverted by mevalonic acid, thus suggesting that they were mediated by the inhibition of HMGCoA reductase and were likely to be subsequent to the reduced availability of precursor molecules for RhoA prenylation. Both the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 and the RhoA inhibitor toxin B (from Clostridium difficile) mimicked the statins' effects, enhancing doxorubicin accumulation, NO synthesis and IKKα phosphorylation and decreasing the amount of IkBα in HMM cells. Simvastatin, Y27632 and toxin B elicited tyrosine nitration in the P‐glycoprotein, thus providing a likely mechanism by which NO reverts the doxorubicin resistance in HMM cells. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.21832

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In solid tumours, a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene.

    “We observed in solid tumours that a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene (Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008).”

    From The association of statins plus LDL receptor‐targeted liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin increases in vitro drug delivery across blood–brain barrier cells (2012) · cites this paper as Riganti et al., 2006

    The Results and Discussion report that statins reduced active RhoA in human malignant mesothelioma cells and activated the IKK/NF-κB pathway; the paper also links this pathway to increased iNOS expression. But it does not establish that a measured decrease in GGPP caused the sequence, and its experiments in mesothelioma cells do not establish it across solid tumours generally. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours.

    “Previous works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Kopecka et al., 2011).”

    From The association of statins plus LDL receptor‐targeted liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin increases in vitro drug delivery across blood–brain barrier cells (2012) · cites this paper as Riganti et al., 2006

    The Discussion reports that mevastatin and simvastatin potentiated doxorubicin-induced cell death in human malignant mesothelioma cells, supporting a chemosensitizing effect. The Cells section identifies these as mesothelial-origin cells; this paper does not establish the claim across epithelial tumours more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In cancer cells, statins increase synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux, and decrease amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers activity of Pgp/ABCB1.

    “We have previously observed that in cancer cells, statins increase the synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008), and decrease the amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 (Kopecka et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00172-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.050 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600673 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980302)75:5<757::AID-IJC15>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1023/A:1012292230480 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrc706 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0005-2728(99)00029-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)36703-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00092-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0167-5699(97)01197-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0486 · DOI
  12. Munyappa R, 2000, Inhibition of Rho protein stimulates iNOS expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells, Am J Physiol, 278, H1762
  13. 10.1097/00005344-200107000-00008 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/hy1101.093103 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.08.029 · DOI
  16. 10.1158/0008-5472.516.65.2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1074/jbc.273.33.20685 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.04.027 · DOI
  19. Beutler E, 1971, Red cell metabolism. A manual of biochemical methods, 56
  20. 10.1016/0891-5849(94)90140-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1172/JCI1052 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00905-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1083/jcb.151.7.1413 · DOI
  24. 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1692-1698.2000 · DOI
  25. 10.1161/01.RES.87.7.526 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/bi972592c · DOI
  27. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703607 · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.459 · DOI
  29. 10.1042/bj3510095 · DOI
  30. 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4218 · DOI
  31. 10.1152/ajplung.00459.2001 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00459-3 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203219 · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M304278200 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208810 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1288 · DOI
  37. 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.3.527 · DOI
  38. 10.1378/chest.126.4.1318 · DOI
  39. 10.1053/hupa.2002.126191 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/ijc.11209 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M406696200 · DOI
  42. 10.1183/09031936.96.09122565 · DOI
  43. Wong WWL, 2001, Cerivastatin triggers tumor‐specific apoptosis with higher efficacy than lovastatin, Clin Cancer Res, 7, 2067
  44. 10.1074/jbc.M201253200 · DOI
  45. Agarwal B, 1999, Lovastatin augments apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents in colon cancer cells, Clin Cancer Res, 5, 2223
  46. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03575-5 · DOI
  47. 10.1023/A:1011036428972 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.11.009 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00193-8 · DOI
  50. 10.1006/excr.2001.5165 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00266-3 · DOI
  52. 10.1074/jbc.M105242200 · DOI
  53. Hodge JC, 2003, Requirement of RhoA activity for increased nuclear factor kB activity and PC‐3 human prostate cell invasion, Cancer Res, 63, 1359
  54. 10.1016/S1471-4914(03)00028-5 · DOI
  55. 10.1172/JCI11991 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204168 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01635-0 · DOI
  58. Cusack JC, 2000, Inducible chemoresistance to 7‐ethyl‐10‐[4‐(1‐piperidino)‐1‐piperidino]‐carbonylcarboxyamptothecin (CPT‐11) in colorectal cancer cells and a xenograft model is overcome by inhibition of nuclear factor‐κB activation, Cancer Res, 60, 2323
  59. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206056 · DOI
  60. Huang Y, 2000, NF‐κB/IkB signalling pathway may contribute to the mediation of paclitaxel‐induced apoptosis in solid tumor cells, Cancer Res, 60, 4426
  61. 10.1021/bi982236 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riganti, C., Orecchia, S., Pescarmona, G., Betta, P. G., Ghigo, D., & Bosia, A.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-17
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
17-27
ISSN
  • 0020-7136
  • 1097-0215
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review