The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 18 of the 62 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The association of statins plus LDL receptor‐targeted liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin increases in vitro drug delivery across blood–brain barrier cells
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The passage of drugs across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours. For instance, the anticancer drug doxorubicin, which is effective against glioblastoma in vitro, has poor efficacy in vivo, because it is extruded by P‐glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance‐related proteins and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in BBB cells. The aim of this study was to convert poorly permeant drugs like doxorubicin into drugs able to cross the BBB. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Experiments were performed on primary human cerebral microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells, alone and co‐cultured with human brain and epithelial tumour cells. KEY RESULTS Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters. Statins also increased the number of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors exposed on the surface of BBB cells, as well as on tumour cells like human glioblastoma. We showed that the association of statins plus drug‐loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non‐permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB, allowing its delivery into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells and to achieve significant anti‐tumour cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS We suggest that our ‘Trojan horse’ approach, based on the administration of statins plus a LDL receptor‐targeted liposomal drug, might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different brain diseases for which the BBB represents an obstacle.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In hCMEC/D3 blood–brain barrier cells, statins increased NO, nitrated and inhibited Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2, and raised surface LDL receptors; combining statins with LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin (apo-Lipodox) increased doxorubicin permeability across BBB monolayers and delivery/cytotoxicity in co-cultured brain and epithelial tumour cells. The authors propose this “Trojan horse” statin plus apo-Lipodox strategy as a potential way to overcome BBB and ABC-transporter barriers, pending in vivo validation.
Key findings
- Mevastatin and simvastatin (0.1 mmol·L−1) reduced cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, lowered RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, activated NF-κB/iNOS, and increased NOS activity and nitrite; this was accompanied by tyrosine nitration of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and decreased ATPase activity, whereas MRP1/ABCC1 was not nitrated or inhibited.
- Statins increased LDL receptor mRNA at 24 h and surface LDL receptor protein at 48 h; apo-Lipodox had a mean LDL receptor-targeted peptide concentration of 20 ± 1.6 µg·mL−1 (about 3 × 10^12 peptides·mL−1) and a radius of 72.05 ± 23.14 nm, and its permeability across hCMEC/D3 cells was higher than free doxorubicin, further increased by statins, and blocked by the NO scavenger PTIO or competing free apoB100 peptide.
- In Transwell co-cultures with U87-MG, SJKNP, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cells, simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox produced the highest intracellular doxorubicin accumulation, LDH release, and caspase-3 activation; free doxorubicin alone showed little delivery or cytotoxicity.
Methods
- Primary human cerebral microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were studied alone and co-cultured in Transwell inserts with human glioblastoma U87-MG, neuroblastoma SJKNP, breast cancer MDA-MB-231, and lung cancer A549 cells.
- Assays included cholesterol/GGPP synthesis, membrane cholesterol, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-κB activity, NOS activity/nitrite, Western blot and immunoprecipitation for nitrated ABC transporters, ABC transporter ATPase activity, rhodamine 123 and Hoechst 33342 efflux, LDL receptor RT-PCR and flow cytometry, liposome synthesis/characterization, permeability coefficients, intracellular doxorubicin, LDH release, and caspase-3 activation.
- Data are presented as means ± SD and analyzed by one-way ANOVA, with P < 0.05 considered significant.
Limitations
- The paper states that all experiments are in vitro; the authors are currently testing the association in animal models to determine pharmacokinetics, optimal administration regimen, immunogenicity of apo-Lipodox, antitumour effect, and side effects, so in vivo feasibility and efficacy are not established here.
- The authors state they cannot exclude earlier (<6 h) NO-mediated changes in Pgp/ABCB1 expression, other statin mechanisms such as decreased Pgp expression/glycosylation or reduced membrane cholesterol, and note that NO effects depend on species, amount, and rate of NO released.
- The authors also state that the extent of increased drug delivery/toxicity varied among cell lines depending on ABC transporter and LDL receptor levels and other resistance mechanisms, and that tumour cells on the basal side may differently affect BBB permeability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 of 62 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Statins are reported to exert cytotoxic effects against CNS tumour cells.
“Moreover statins are reported to exert cytotoxic effects against CNS tumour cells (Bababeygy et al., 2009;Yanae et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bababeygy et al., 2009
- cites Yanae et al., 2011 source
- Premisecitation
By lowering de novo synthesis of cholesterol, statins force mammalian cells to expose the LDL receptor on their surface.
“By lowering the de novo synthesis of cholesterol, statins force mammalian cells to expose the LDL receptor on their surface (Liao and Laufs, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Liao and Laufs, 2005 source
The Introduction says statins inhibit endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis and increase hepatic LDL receptor activity, which supports the claim’s basic mechanism. It does not say that statins force mammalian cells generally to display LDL receptors on their surface; its receptor finding is specific to the liver, and it describes activity rather than surface exposure. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Increased production of NO elicited by statins reduces activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“the increased production of NO elicited by the statins reduced the activity of at least two proteins -Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 -that are involved in the apical extrusion of drugs in hCMEC/D3 cells (Tai et al., 2009) and in vivo (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Tai et al., 2009 source
- cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
- cites Mercer et al., 2009 source
Section 7 (page unavailable) says P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps can prevent drugs from crossing the blood–brain barrier, supporting the general point that these proteins limit drug entry. It does not say that statin-induced nitric oxide reduces P-glycoprotein or BCRP activity in vivo; the citing sentence attributes the hCMEC/D3-cell finding to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
hCMEC/D3 cells constitutively express Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, and BCRP/ABCG2.
“hCMEC/D3 cells constitutively express several ABC transporters (Carl et al., 2010), like Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, BCRP/ ABCG2 (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Carl et al., 2010 source
- Premisecitation
The brain microvascular endothelium has high levels of drug efflux pumps of the ABC transporter family.
“In addition, having no fenestrations and many tight junctions, the brain microvascular endothelium has high levels of drug efflux pumps of the ABC transporter family (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
- cites Mercer et al., 2009 source
Section 7, “Challenges Associated with Targeted Therapies” (page unavailable), says that P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps impede some drugs from crossing the blood–brain barrier. It does not specify that brain microvascular endothelial cells have high levels of these pumps, or identify the pumps collectively as ABC transporters. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Robey et al., 2010 source
- Premisecitation
The effects of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil or Caelyx) in glioblastoma are unconvincing.
“The effects of a pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil or Caelyx) have recently been investigated in glioblastoma, but the results obtained are unconvincing (Glas et al., 2007;Beier et al., 2009;Ananda et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
In the experimental conditions used, mevastatin and simvastatin did not affect the permeability to inulin.
“In the experimental conditions used in this study, mevastatin and simvastatin reduced the amount of cholesterol in the cell membrane by a lesser extent than b-methyl-cyclodextrin (Supporting information Figure S1A) and did not affect the permeability to inulin (Supporting information Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The NO scavenger PTIO prevents the statin-induced increase in permeability to doxorubicin in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The presence of the NO scavenger 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5,tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide (PTIO) prevented the increase in permeability to doxorubicin (Figure 2E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The synthesis of NO, measured as the amount of the stable NO-derivative nitrite in culture supernatant, was significantly increased in hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin or simvastatin.
“As a consequence of these changes, the global enzymatic activity of NOS in cell lysates and the synthesis of NO, measured as the amount of the stable NO-derivative nitrite in culture supernatant, were significantly increased in hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin or simvastatin (Figure 1F).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingreasoning
Addition of PTIO dramatically decreases the permeability of apo-Lipodox in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Again, the addition of PTIO dramatically decreased the permeability of apo-Lipodox”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All cell lines (U87-MG, SJKNP, MDA-MB-231, A549) express at various levels Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, and BCRP/ABCG2.
“A preliminary characterization of these cell lines showed that they all expressed at various levels Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2 (Figure 4A)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non-permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB.
“We showed that the association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non-permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB, allowing its delivery into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells and to achieve significant anti-tumour cytotoxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Permeability measured across hCMEC/D3 cell monolayers reflects drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier in vivo.
- Findingown data
The increase in phospho-IKKα/β was accompanied by a decrease in the inhibitory protein IκB-α in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Such an increase was accompanied by a decrease in the inhibitory protein Ik-Ba (Figure 1C) and by the activation of NF-kB, measured as the ability of the transcription factor translocated into the nucleus to bind its specific target sequence (Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Drug delivery into tumour cells is improved by pretreating BBB cells with simvastatin for 48 h followed by doxorubicin or apo-Lipodox in the last 24 h.
“the drug delivery into tumour cells was improved by pretreating BBB cells with simvastatin for 48 h followed by doxorubicin or apo-Lipodox in the last 24 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lowest concentration that significantly decreased cholesterol and GGPP level after 24 h was 0.1 mmol•L -1.
“The lowest concentration that significantly decreased cholesterol and GGPP level after 24 h was 0.1 mmol•L -1 and this was chosen for all the subsequent experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Apo-Lipodox exhibits a mean concentration of LDL receptor-targeted peptide of 20 ± 1.6 mg/mL, corresponding to about 3 × 10^12 peptides/mL.
“Apo-Lipodox exhibited a mean concentration of LDL receptor-targeted peptide of 20 Ϯ 1.6 mg•mL -1 , corresponding to about 3 ¥ 10 12 peptides•mL -1 (n = 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Statins induce a persistent inhibition of Pgp/ABCB1 activity after 48 h.
“The reduction was even more pronounced after 48 h, indicating that statins induce a persistent inhibition of Pgp/ ABCB1 activity after a longer time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Permeability of pegylated and non-pegylated apo-Lipodox is superimposable in both untreated and simvastatin-treated hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The permeability of pegylated and nonpegylated apo-Lipodox was superimposable in both untreated and simvastatin-treated hCMEC/D3 cells (Supporting information Figure S2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The activity of the geranylgeranylated protein RhoA, measured as the amount of active GTP-bound protein, was reduced by both statins in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“In keeping with the decrease in GGPP, the activity of the geranylgeranylated protein RhoA, measured as the amount of active GTP-bound protein, was reduced by both statins, resulting in a lower activation of the downstream effector RhoA kinase (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, permeability for apo-Lipodox is significantly greater than that of free doxorubicin.
“In untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, the permeability for apo-Lipodox was significantly greater than that of free doxorubicin”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mevastatin and simvastatin reduced the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and GGPP in hCMEC/D3 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
“The human brain microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were sensitive to both mevastatin and simvastatin, two lipophilic statins that reduced the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and GGPP in a dose-and time-dependent manner (Figure 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NOS II was undetectable in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Statins increased the expression of NOS II; this was undetectable in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs achieved significant anti-tumour cytotoxicity.
“We showed that the association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non-permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB, allowing its delivery into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells and to achieve significant anti-tumour cytotoxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The co-culture of hCMEC/D3 cells with tumour cells in Transwell devices reflects drug delivery to brain tumours in vivo.
- Findingown data
Statins did not induce NOS I in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The statins did not induce NOS I and did not change the expression of NOS III, but a slight increase in the amount of the active phospho-(Ser1177)-NOS III was detected following statins treatment (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Intracellular retention of rhodamine 123 and Hoechst 33342 is increased by statins in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“the intracellular retention of rhodamine 123 (Figure 2C) that is inversely related to the activity of Pgp/ABCB1, and the intracellular retention of Hoechst 33342 (Figure 2D) that is inversely related to the activity of BCRP/ABCG2, were both increased by the statins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Effects of statins on Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 activity are stronger after 48 h than after 24 h.
“the effects of these changes on the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 were stronger after 48 h (Figure 2C and D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The transport of apo-Lipodox across the BBB monolayer is higher than that of free doxorubicin in hCMEC/D3 cells exposed to statins.
“The transport of apo-Lipodox across the BBB monolayer was even higher than that of free doxorubicin in cells exposed to statins (Figures 2E and 3D; significance of apo-Lipodox vs. doxorubicin in statin-treated cells: P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins increased the expression of NOS II in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Statins increased the expression of NOS II; this was undetectable in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In hCMEC/D3 cells, the permeability coefficient of doxorubicin is low.
“also in hCMEC/D3 cells, the permeability coefficient was low (Figure 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Doxorubicin is transported by Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2.
- Findingreasoning
The final result of treating BBB cells with statins is a dramatic increase in permeability of doxorubicin, a substrate of both Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2.
“Whatever the pleiotropic effects of statins on ABC transporters are, the final result of treating BBB cells with statins was a dramatic increase in the permeability of doxorubicin, a substrate of both Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins increased the number of LDL receptors exposed on the surface of tumour cells like human glioblastoma.
“Statins also increased the number of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors exposed on the surface of BBB cells, as well as on tumour cells like human glioblastoma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The amount of LDL receptor protein on the cell surface is further increased by statins after 48 h in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The amount of LDL receptor protein on the cell surface was further increased by statins after 48 h (Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mevastatin and simvastatin did not significantly change the expression of IKKα/β protein in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“In parallel, the amount of IKKa/b complex phosphorylated on serine 176/180, which was nearly undetectable in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, was increased by mevastatin and simvastatin, without significant changes in the expression of IKKa/b protein (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For all these cell lines, the maximal increase in drug retention and LDH release is achieved by the combination of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox.
“For all the cell lines, the maximal increase in these parameters was achieved by the combination of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BBB cells treated with statins that inhibited RhoA kinase, phosphorylation of eNOS is increased.
“In accord with these observations, we detected an increased phosphorylation of eNOS in BBB cells treated with statins that inhibited RhoA kinase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the experimental conditions used, mevastatin and simvastatin reduced the amount of cholesterol in the cell membrane by a lesser extent than β-methyl-cyclodextrin.
“In the experimental conditions used in this study, mevastatin and simvastatin reduced the amount of cholesterol in the cell membrane by a lesser extent than b-methyl-cyclodextrin (Supporting information Figure S1A) and did not affect the permeability to inulin (Supporting information Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The amount of IKKα/β complex phosphorylated on serine 176/180 was increased by mevastatin and simvastatin in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“In parallel, the amount of IKKa/b complex phosphorylated on serine 176/180, which was nearly undetectable in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, was increased by mevastatin and simvastatin, without significant changes in the expression of IKKa/b protein (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs allowed delivery of doxorubicin into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells.
“We showed that the association of statins plus drug-loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non-permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB, allowing its delivery into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells and to achieve significant anti-tumour cytotoxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The co-culture of hCMEC/D3 cells with tumour cells in Transwell devices reflects drug delivery to brain tumours in vivo.
- Findingown data
Statins increased the number of LDL receptors exposed on the surface of BBB cells.
“Statins also increased the number of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors exposed on the surface of BBB cells, as well as on tumour cells like human glioblastoma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hCMEC/D3 cell line is a suitable in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier.
- Findingown data
The strongest fluorescent signal is achieved by the association of simvastatin (for 48 h) plus apo-Lipodox (in the last 24 h).
“The strongest fluorescent signal was achieved by the association of simvastatin (for 48 h) plus apo-Lipodox (in the last 24 h; Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-incubation of free doxorubicin with empty liposomes, with or without LDL receptor-targeted peptide, in hCMEC/D3 cells pretreated or not with simvastatin does not change permeability compared with free doxorubicin alone.
“Furthermore, when we co-incubated free doxorubicin with empty liposomes, with or without the LDL receptor-targeted peptide, in hCMEC/D3 cells pretreated or not with simvastatin (0.1 mmol•L -1 for 48 h), we did not detect a different permeability compared with free doxorubicin alone (Supporting information Figure S3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Doxorubicin alone does not exert any relevant cytotoxic effect in tumour cells, in terms of LDH release and caspase-3 activation.
“In keeping with these results, doxorubicin alone did not exert any relevant cytotoxic effect in tumour cells, in terms of LDH release (Figure 5B) and caspase-3 activation (Figure 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The up-regulation of iNOS isoform together with increased eNOS phosphorylation leads to a significant increase in NO levels.
“This event, together with the up-regulation of iNOS isoform, led to a significant increase in NO levels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A slight increase in the amount of the active phospho-(Ser1177)-NOS III was detected following statins treatment in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The statins did not induce NOS I and did not change the expression of NOS III, but a slight increase in the amount of the active phospho-(Ser1177)-NOS III was detected following statins treatment (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The global enzymatic activity of NOS in cell lysates was significantly increased in hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin or simvastatin.
“As a consequence of these changes, the global enzymatic activity of NOS in cell lysates and the synthesis of NO, measured as the amount of the stable NO-derivative nitrite in culture supernatant, were significantly increased in hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin or simvastatin (Figure 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Free doxorubicin co-incubated with empty liposomes, with or without LDL receptor-targeted peptide, does not accumulate within U87-MG cells more than doxorubicin alone, either in absence or presence of simvastatin.
“Free doxorubicin co-incubated with empty liposomes, with or without the LDL receptor-targeted peptide, did not accumulate within U87-MG cells more than doxorubicin alone, either in the absence or in the presence of simvastatin (Supporting information Figure S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Low levels of endogenous NO induced by statins are sufficient to elicit detectable nitration of Pgp/ABCB1, which decreases its activity.
“Such low levels of endogenous NO, however, were sufficient to elicit a detectable nitration of the transporter, which decreased its activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
β-methyl-cyclodextrin significantly depleted the cell membrane of cholesterol in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The cholesterol chelator b-methyl-cyclodextrin significantly depleted the cell membrane of cholesterol (Supporting information Figure S1A) and in parallel disrupted the integrity of the tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, as demonstrated by the increased permeability coefficient of inulin (Supporting information Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lipodox permeability is the same in the presence of simvastatin or of the competing peptide.
“In contrast, Lipodox permeability was the same in the presence of simvastatin or of the competing peptide (Figure 3E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The human brain microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were sensitive to both mevastatin and simvastatin.
“The human brain microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were sensitive to both mevastatin and simvastatin, two lipophilic statins that reduced the endogenous synthesis of cholesterol and GGPP in a dose-and time-dependent manner (Figure 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins activated NF-kB in hCMEC/D3 cells, measured as the ability of the transcription factor translocated into the nucleus to bind its specific target sequence.
“Such an increase was accompanied by a decrease in the inhibitory protein Ik-Ba (Figure 1C) and by the activation of NF-kB, measured as the ability of the transcription factor translocated into the nucleus to bind its specific target sequence (Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment with statins for 48 h significantly increases the permeability of doxorubicin across hCMEC/D3 cells.
“However, the treatment with statins for 48 h significantly increased the permeability of the drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
β-methyl-cyclodextrin disrupted the integrity of the tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, as demonstrated by the increased permeability coefficient of inulin.
“The cholesterol chelator b-methyl-cyclodextrin significantly depleted the cell membrane of cholesterol (Supporting information Figure S1A) and in parallel disrupted the integrity of the tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, as demonstrated by the increased permeability coefficient of inulin (Supporting information Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hCMEC/D3 cell line is a suitable in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier.
- Findingown data
The reduction in RhoA activity by statins resulted in a lower activation of the downstream effector RhoA kinase in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“In keeping with the decrease in GGPP, the activity of the geranylgeranylated protein RhoA, measured as the amount of active GTP-bound protein, was reduced by both statins, resulting in a lower activation of the downstream effector RhoA kinase (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quantitative fluorimetric analysis confirms that intratumour doxorubicin content is significantly higher when simvastatin is combined with apo-Lipodox rather than with doxorubicin in all cell lines co-cultured with hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Quantitative fluorimetric analysis of intratumour doxorubicin confirmed that the drug content was significantly higher when simvastatin was combined with apo-Lipodox rather than with doxorubicin in all the cell lines co-cultured with hCMEC/D3 cells (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin and simvastatin, mRNA level for LDL receptors is significantly increased after 24 h.
“In hCMEC/D3 cells treated with mevastatin and simvastatin, the mRNA level for LDL receptors was significantly increased after 24 h (Figure 3A)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mevastatin and simvastatin promote tyrosine nitration of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“mevastatin and simvastatin promoted a nitration on tyrosine of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2, similar to the one produced by the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Death of glioblastoma cells, measured as release of LDH and activation of caspase-3, is not increased by addition of free doxorubicin to empty liposomes.
“Similarly, the death of glioblastoma cells, measured as release of LDH and activation of caspase-3, was not increased by the addition of free doxorubicin to empty liposomes (Supporting information Figure S4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When added to the upper chamber of the Transwell containing confluent hCMEC/D3 cells on the insert and U87-MG in the lower chamber, doxorubicin poorly enters glioblastoma cells.
“When added to the upper chamber of the Transwell containing confluent hCMEC/D3 cells on the insert and U87-MG in the lower chamber, doxorubicin poorly entered glioblastoma cells, as shown by the low red fluorescence in U87-MG cells recovered by the lower chamber (Figure 5A)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins did not change the expression of NOS III in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The statins did not induce NOS I and did not change the expression of NOS III, but a slight increase in the amount of the active phospho-(Ser1177)-NOS III was detected following statins treatment (Figure 1E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ATPase activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2, but not MRP1/ABCC1, is decreased in hCMEC/D3 cells in the presence of statins.
“the ATPase activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2, but not that MRP1/ABCC1, was decreased in the presence of the statins (Figure 2B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect NF-kB pathway in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-kB pathway and NO synthesis in BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Statins, at concentrations found in blood of patients receiving anti-cholesterolemic therapy, enhance efficacy of doxorubicin against glioblastoma cells.
“It is noteworthy, however, that statins, at concentrations that are found in the blood of patients receiving anti-cholesterolemic therapy, enhanced the efficacy of a chemotherapeutic drug like doxorubicin against glioblastoma cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect doxorubicin permeability across BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on ABC transporters activity and doxorubicin permeability across BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In co-culture models, application of free doxorubicin on luminal side of hCMEC/D3 monolayer does not yield any strong drug delivery into tumour cells growing under BBB.
“In co-culture models, the application of free doxorubicin on the luminal side of hCMEC/D3 monolayer did not yield any strong drug delivery into the tumour cells growing under the BBB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect tight junctions integrity in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of statins on membrane cholesterol and tight junctions integrity in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect GGPP synthesis in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-kB pathway and NO synthesis in BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Empty liposomal shells do not exert any permeabilizing activity on delivery of doxorubicin across BBB.
“Empty liposomal shells, which inhibited the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 in chemoresistant tumours (Riganti et al., 2011), did not exert any permeabilizing activity on the delivery of doxorubicin across the BBB”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
- Findingown data
Statins affect NO synthesis in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-kB pathway and NO synthesis in BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.
“Effects of statins on the expression of LDL receptors and on the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect membrane cholesterol in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of statins on membrane cholesterol and tight junctions integrity in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect cholesterol synthesis in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-kB pathway and NO synthesis in BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect RhoA/RhoA kinase activity in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-kB pathway and NO synthesis in BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect the expression of LDL receptors in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on the expression of LDL receptors and on the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Statins affect ABC transporters activity in BBB cells.
“Effects of statins on ABC transporters activity and doxorubicin permeability across BBB cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
We did not detect direct cytotoxic effects of statins in co-cultured glioblastoma cells.
“We did not detect direct cytotoxic effects of statins in co-cultured glioblastoma cells, perhaps because we used simvastatin at lower dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Apo-Lipodox has been previously validated for efficacy in solid tumours with high expression of LDL receptors.
“We have previously validated the efficacy of an engineered LDL receptor-targeted liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin ('apo-Lipodox') in solid tumours with high expression of LDL receptors (Kopecka et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kopecka et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
It is unlikely that statins, at least at concentrations used in this study, increase paracellular transport across BBB.
“According to these data, it seems unlikely that statins -at least at the concentrations used in this study -increase the paracellular transport across BBB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The mechanism by which statins reduce vascular tone and increase cerebral flow is via increased NO levels.
“this suggests that this is the mechanism by which statins reduce the vascular tone and increase cerebral flow, as inhibitors of Rho kinase produce similar effects (Rikitake et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rikitake et al., 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles adsorb apoB-100 and apo-E proteins from human low-density lipoproteins (LDLs).
“Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles adsorb apoB-100 and apo-E proteins from human low-density lipoprotein (LDLs; Kim et al., 2007), are recognized by the LDL receptor and achieve an efficient drug delivery into brain parenchyma (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007) because both neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors (Ambruosi et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al., 2007 source
- Interpretationown data
The liposomal shell itself does not exert a permeabilizing effect on doxorubicin delivery across hCMEC/D3 cells.
“We thus excluded a permeabilizing effect exerted by the liposomal shell itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Liposome-encapsulated drugs have been proposed as vehicles able to cross the BBB (through a diffusion process or a receptor-mediated endocytosis) and deliver their cargo into the CNS.
“As alternative strategy, liposome-encapsulated drugs that have shown selective intratumour drug delivery, lower side effects and particular efficacy against aggressive and chemoresistant tumours (Jabr-Milane et al., 2008;Riganti et al., 2011), have been proposed as vehicles able to cross the BBB (through a diffusion process or a receptor-mediated endocytosis) and deliver their cargo into the CNS (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deelen and Loscher, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Nitration probably impairs the catalytic cycle of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 pumps.
“suggesting that the nitration probably impairs the catalytic cycle of the pumps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
NO levels play a crucial role in regulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“suggesting that NO levels play a crucial role in regulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Liposome-encapsulated drugs have shown particular efficacy against aggressive and chemoresistant tumours.
“As alternative strategy, liposome-encapsulated drugs that have shown selective intratumour drug delivery, lower side effects and particular efficacy against aggressive and chemoresistant tumours (Jabr-Milane et al., 2008;Riganti et al., 2011), have been proposed as vehicles able to cross the BBB (through a diffusion process or a receptor-mediated endocytosis) and deliver their cargo into the CNS (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jabr-Milane et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
- Interpretationown data
The reduction in efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 by statins is mediated by increased synthesis of NO.
“Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Liposome-encapsulated drugs have shown selective intratumour drug delivery.
“As alternative strategy, liposome-encapsulated drugs that have shown selective intratumour drug delivery, lower side effects and particular efficacy against aggressive and chemoresistant tumours (Jabr-Milane et al., 2008;Riganti et al., 2011), have been proposed as vehicles able to cross the BBB (through a diffusion process or a receptor-mediated endocytosis) and deliver their cargo into the CNS (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jabr-Milane et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
- Premisecitation
ABC transporters have also been identified in CNS tumours, where they contribute to frequently observed chemoresistance.
“The latter have also been identified in CNS tumours (Nakagawa et al., 2009), where they contribute to the frequently observed chemoresistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nakagawa et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The persistent inhibition of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 activity by statins is due to continuous synthesis of NO by hCMEC/D3 cells.
“The reversal of statins' effects by the NO scavenger PTIO suggests that the persistent inhibition of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 activity was due to a continuous synthesis of NO by hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
NO levels and the consequent status of nitration on ABC transporters are critical for the transport of apo-Lipodox in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“suggesting that the NO levels -and the consequent status of nitration on ABC transporters -are also critical for the transport of apo-Lipodox in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles are recognized by the LDL receptor and achieve efficient drug delivery into brain parenchyma.
“Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles adsorb apoB-100 and apo-E proteins from human low-density lipoprotein (LDLs; Kim et al., 2007), are recognized by the LDL receptor and achieve an efficient drug delivery into brain parenchyma (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007) because both neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors (Ambruosi et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Michaelis et al., 2006 source
- cites Nikanjam et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Liposome-encapsulated drugs have shown lower side effects.
“As alternative strategy, liposome-encapsulated drugs that have shown selective intratumour drug delivery, lower side effects and particular efficacy against aggressive and chemoresistant tumours (Jabr-Milane et al., 2008;Riganti et al., 2011), have been proposed as vehicles able to cross the BBB (through a diffusion process or a receptor-mediated endocytosis) and deliver their cargo into the CNS (”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jabr-Milane et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
- Interpretationown data
Uptake of non-targeted liposomes is not dependent on LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.
“suggesting that the uptake of non-targeted liposomes was not dependent on the LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In rat C6 glioma cells, 5 mmol/L mevastatin and simvastatin induce apoptosis by decreasing intracellular availability of GGPP and activation of ERK1/2 and Akt.
“for instance, in rat C6 glioma cells, 5 mmol•L -1 mevastatin and simvastatin induced apoptosis by decreasing the intracellular availability of GGPP and the activation of ERK1/2 and Akt (Yanae et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yanae et al., 2011 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
Effects of lipidic envelope alone on doxorubicin delivery across BBB may be tissue-dependent.
“suggesting that the effects of the lipidic envelope alone may be tissue-dependent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Liposomes have a facilitated entry within BBB cells by simple endocytosis.
“Since both the non-LDL receptor-targeted Lipodox and the LDL receptor-targeted apo-Lipodox had a higher uptake than free doxorubicin in the absence of statins, it is likely that liposomes have a facilitated entry within BBB cells by simple endocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The extent of increase in drug delivery and toxicity is variable, depending on different levels and activity of ABC transporters and LDL receptors, and on existence of other mechanisms of resistance characterizing each cell line.
“However, the extent of this increase was variable, depending on the different levels and activity of ABC transporters and LDL receptors, and on the existence of other mechanisms of resistance characterizing each cell line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach proposed in this work differs from other studies on CNS-penetrating nanoparticles because it is more 'physiological': it takes advantage of usual metabolic effects of therapeutic doses of statins and from properties of liposomes.
“The approach proposed in our work differs from the other studies on CNS-penetrating nanoparticles because it is more 'physiological': it takes advantage of the usual metabolic effects of therapeutic doses of statins -the increase in LDL receptors exposed and the synthesis of NO -and from the properties of liposomes, that induce permeability across the BBB and efficacy against drugresistant tumours”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The greater permeability of apo-Lipodox in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells is probably a consequence of decreased efflux via Pgp/ABCB1 and increased uptake.
“probably as a consequence of the decreased efflux via Pgp/ABCB1 and of the increased uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The LDL receptor becomes a helpful tool to increase endocytosis of targeted liposomes when its levels increase on the cells' surface after exposure to statins.
“In contrast, the LDL receptor became a helpful tool to increase the endocytosis of targeted liposomes when its levels increased on the cells' surface, that is, after exposure to statins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationAt low micromolar concentrations, mevastatin and simvastatin lower synthesis of isoprenoids in hCMEC/D3 cells and decrease activity of RhoGTPase.
“At low (micromolar) concentrations, that is, in keeping with the K i of statins for 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (Liao and Laufs, 2005), mevastatin and simvastatin lowered the synthesis of isoprenoids in hCMEC/D3 cells and decreased the activity of RhoGTPase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Liao and Laufs, 2005 source
The citation is attached to the assertion that low-micromolar concentrations are in keeping with statins’ inhibition constants, not to the citing authors’ hCMEC/D3 results. The Introduction instead reports a Ki of 1.4 nM for mevastatin and says statins bind HMG-CoA reductase at nanomolar concentrations; it is the natural substrate that binds at micromolar concentrations. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPrevious works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours.
“Previous works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Kopecka et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Riganti et al., 2005 source
- cites Riganti et al., 2006 source
The Discussion reports that mevastatin and simvastatin potentiated doxorubicin-induced cell death in human malignant mesothelioma cells, supporting a chemosensitizing effect. The Cells section identifies these as mesothelial-origin cells; this paper does not establish the claim across epithelial tumours more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Kopecka et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn cancer cells, statins increase synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux, and decrease amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers activity of Pgp/ABCB1.
“We have previously observed that in cancer cells, statins increase the synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008), and decrease the amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 (Kopecka et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn solid tumours, a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene.
“We observed in solid tumours that a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene (Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Riganti et al., 2006 source
The Results and Discussion report that statins reduced active RhoA in human malignant mesothelioma cells and activated the IKK/NF-κB pathway; the paper also links this pathway to increased iNOS expression. But it does not establish that a measured decrease in GGPP caused the sequence, and its experiments in mesothelioma cells do not establish it across solid tumours generally. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Riganti et al., 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationEffects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type.
“The effects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type (Nakata et al., 2007;Ahn et al., 2008;32: Ye et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Nakata et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ahn et al., 2008 source
The Discussion passage describes RANKL-induced NF-κB signaling in osteoclastogenesis, and the IKK assay passage examines simvastatin’s effect in RAW 264.7 cells; neither addresses whether RhoA’s effects vary by cell type. Searches for RhoA and nitric oxide synthesis found no passage addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ye et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDoxorubicin is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2.
“Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
- cites Mercer et al., 2009 source
Section 7, “Challenges Associated with Targeted Therapies” (page unavailable), says that some small molecules are substrates of P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps, limiting delivery across the blood-brain barrier. It does not identify doxorubicin as one of those molecules or say that it is a substrate of MRP1/ABCC1 or BCRP/ABCG2. Searches for doxorubicin and the named transporters found no passage establishing the specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Robey et al., 2010 source
In “Could the Pgp inhibition hypothesis have been wrong?” (page unavailable), the paper reports that doxorubicin resistance in a mouse breast-cancer model was largely Pgp-mediated. The Introduction (page unavailable) says MRP1 confers resistance to anthracyclines, but it does not specifically identify doxorubicin as an MRP1 substrate; its list of ABCG2 substrates likewise does not include doxorubicin. The three-transporter claim is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBoth tumour cells and BBB endothelial cells are rich in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, like P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-related proteins (MRPs/ABCCs) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) that extrude drugs from the luminal side of endothelial cells back into the blood and out of the tumour cells.
“Both tumour cells and BBB endothelial cells are rich in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, like P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-related proteins (MRPs/ABCCs) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) that extrude drugs from the luminal side of endothelial cells back into the blood and out of the tumour cells (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
- cites Mercer et al., 2009 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Robey et al., 2010 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPhase I/II trials with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin have shown that the drug has very few side effects and is well tolerated, but does not offer a significant advantage in overall survival or progression-free survival compared to standard protocols.
“Phase I/II trials with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin have shown that the drug has very few side effects and is well tolerated, but does not offer a significant advantage in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival in comparison to the standard protocols based on radio-chemotherapy (Glas et al., 2007;Beier et al., 2009;Ananda et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Glas et al., 2007 source
- cites Beier et al., 2009 source
The Results (Activity of the combination regimen; page not provided) find no statistically significant improvement in progression-free or overall survival versus the historical radio-chemotherapy control. The Discussion calls overall toxicity acceptable, but the Results (Toxicity of the combination regimen) report cutaneous effects in almost all patients and substantial hematologic toxicity, so “very few side effects” overstates the findings. The trial tested PEG-Dox as part of a combination regimen, not the drug alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ananda et al., 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationA direct anti-tumour activity of statins against glioblastoma cells has been reported previously.
“A direct anti-tumour activity of statins against glioblastoma cells has been reported previously (Bababeygy et al., 2009;Yanae et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bababeygy et al., 2009
- cites Yanae et al., 2011 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataApo-Lipodox crosses the BBB monolayer at a significantly higher rate when hCMEC/D3 cells are pre-incubated with simvastatin, and this transport is dramatically decreased by competing free LDL receptor-targeted peptide.
“However, apo-Lipodox crossed the BBB monolayer at a significantly higher rate when cells where pre-incubated with simvastatin, which increased the amount of LDL receptors (Figure 3A and B); this transport was dramatically decreased by the competing free LDL receptor-targeted peptide (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataApo-Lipodox particles appear as round-shaped particles with electron-dense areas due to doxorubicin packed inside the liposomal shell.
“We thus applied apo-Lipodox that appeared as round-shaped particles with electron-dense areas due to the doxorubicin packed inside the liposomal shell (Figure 3C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSimvastatin does not modify the amount of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, and BCRP/ABCG2 in these cell lines but increases surface LDL receptors.
“simvastatin did not modify the amount of these transporters (Figure 4A) but increased the surface LDL receptors (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIntracellular content of free doxorubicin is low in all these cell lines and not sufficient to elicit cytotoxicity.
“Whereas the intracellular content of free doxorubicin was low in all the cell lines (giving a fluorescence similar to the autofluorescence of untreated cells, Figure 4C) and not sufficient to elicit cytotoxicity (Figure 4C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone givenNO elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2.
“Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataNone of the liposomal formulations modified activation of NF-kB, synthesis of nitrite, activity of NOS enzyme, or induction of necrosis or apoptosis compared to untreated hCMEC/D3 cells.
“None of the liposomal formulations modified the above parameters compared to the untreated cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn human BBB cells, mevastatin and simvastatin decrease synthesis of cholesterol and isoprenoids and reduce amount of cholesterol in plasma membrane.
“We found here that in human BBB cells, the lipophilic statins mevastatin and simvastatin decreased the synthesis of cholesterol and isoprenoids and reduced the amount of cholesterol in plasma membrane.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataA strong decrease in membrane cholesterol caused by b-methyl-cyclodextrin impairs integrity of tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, but smaller variations produced by statins do not.
“In our work, we observed that a strong decrease in membrane cholesterol, caused by b-methyl-cyclodextrin, actually impaired the integrity of tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, but the smaller variations of membrane cholesterol produced by statins did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPegylated and non-pegylated apo-Lipodox do not significantly differ in radius or in the amount of peptide attached.
“These particles did not significantly differ in their radius (Table 1) or in the amount of peptide attached (22 Ϯ 1.9 mg•mL -1 ; n = 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 show a low level of nitration in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, whereas MRP1/ABCC1 shows no detectable nitration in each experimental condition.
“Both these transporters also showed a low level of nitration in untreated cells, whereas no nitration was detectable on MRP1/ABCC1 in each experimental condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataApo-Lipodox is accumulated to a higher extent than free doxorubicin and exerts significant cell damage, as revealed by LDH release.
“apo-Lipodox was accumulated to higher extent, exerting significant cell damage, as revealed by the release of LDH in the culture supernatant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPermeabilities of Lipodox and apo-Lipodox are similar in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells and are unaffected by an excess of free LDL receptor-targeted peptide under basal conditions.
“The permeabilities of Lipodox (liposomal doxorubicin without the LDL receptor-targeted peptide) and apo-Lipodox were similar in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells and were unaffected by an excess of free LDL receptor-targeted peptide under basal conditions (Figure 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn BBB-tumour cell co-cultures, the association of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox is the most effective at achieving significant delivery of doxorubicin and inducing cell death by both necrosis and apoptosis.
“association of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox was the most effective at achieving a significant delivery of doxorubicin (Figure 5B) and inducing cell death by both necrosis (Figure 5B) and apoptosis (Figure 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAddition of simvastatin to free doxorubicin enhances drug retention and LDH release compared to doxorubicin alone.
“The addition of simvastatin to free doxorubicin enhanced the drug retention and the LDH release compared to doxorubicin alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe association of free doxorubicin plus statin or the use of apo-Lipodox are significantly less effective in the presence of a BBB monolayer than without it, although apo-Lipodox increases LDH release in all cell lines and induces caspase-3 activation in A549 and SJKNP cells.
“The association of free doxorubicin plus statin or the use of apo-Lipodox, two experimental conditions that increased the intracellular amount of doxorubicin in the cell lines without a BBB monolayer (Figure 4C), were significantly less effective in the presence of BBB monolayer (Figure 5B), although apo-Lipodox increased the release of LDH in all the cell lines and induced the activation of casp”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSimvastatin enhances number of LDL receptors exposed and induces chemosensitization in different human tumour cells with constitutive expression of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and different degrees of resistance to doxorubicin.
“We show here that simvastatin enhanced the number of LDL receptors exposed and induced chemosensitization in different human tumour (glioblastoma, neuroblastoma, nonsmall cell lung cancer, breast cancer) cells with constitutive expression of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and different degrees of resistance to doxorubicin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningSimvastatin enhances apo-Lipodox uptake and reduces apical efflux of doxorubicin, increasing trans-cellular transport of the drug.
“Simvastatin, which forced BBB cells to expose more LDL receptors and simultaneously decreased the activity of Pgp/ABCB1, indeed enhanced the apo-Lipodox uptake and reduced the apical efflux of doxorubicin, increasing the trans-cellular transport of the drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEmpty liposomes affect NO synthesis in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEmpty liposomes affect cytotoxicity in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataApo-Lipodox alone or combination of simvastatin plus free doxorubicin increases drug delivery and toxicity.
“Apo-Lipodox alone or the combination of simvastatin plus free doxorubicin increased drug delivery and toxicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEmpty liposomes affect NF-kB activity in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPretreatment of tumour cells with simvastatin followed by apo-Lipodox shows the greatest cytotoxic efficacy not only in primary CNS tumours like glioblastoma, but also in epithelial tumours such as lung and breast cancers cells.
“Pretreatment of the tumour cells with simvastatin followed by the apo-Lipodox showed the greatest cytotoxic efficacy not only in primary CNS tumours like glioblastoma, but also in epithelial tumours, such as lung and breast cancers cells, whose metastasis within the CNS are often unresponsive to therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenEmpty liposomes affect the cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.
“Effects of empty liposomes on the delivery and cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenPegylation affects the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.
“Effects of pegylation on the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenEmpty liposomes affect the delivery of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.
“Effects of empty liposomes on the delivery and cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEmpty liposomes affect permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.
“Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBoth neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors.
“Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles adsorb apoB-100 and apo-E proteins from human low-density lipoprotein (LDLs; Kim et al., 2007), are recognized by the LDL receptor and achieve an efficient drug delivery into brain parenchyma (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007) because both neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors (Ambruosi et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ambruosi et al., 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationEmpty liposomes may affect different intracellular pathways modulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 in epithelial cells.
“Empty liposomes may affect different intracellular pathways modulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 in epithelial cells (Riganti et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLiposomal particles alter lipid composition of plasma membrane microdomains, interfere with ATP hydrolysis and substrate binding, and elicit lower extrusion of doxorubicin in Pgp-overexpressing cells.
“Besides being taken up more by LDL receptor-driven endocytosis (Kopecka et al., 2011), liposomal particles alter the lipid composition of the plasma membrane microdomains (i.e.lipid rafts) where Pgp/ABCB1 is active, interfere with ATP hydrolysis and substrate binding, and elicit a lower extrusion of doxorubicin in Pgp-overexpressing cells (Riganti et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kopecka et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationRhoA kinase reduces stability of eNOS mRNA and prevents Akt-dependent phosphorylation of eNOS.
“It has been also shown that RhoA kinase reduces the stability of eNOS mRNA and prevents the Akt-dependent phosphorylation of eNOS (Rikitake and Liao, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rikitake and Liao, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataPresence of PEG does not interfere with the attachment of LDL receptor-targeted peptide or with liposome uptake, either by simple endocytosis or LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.
“suggesting that the presence of PEG did not interfere with the attachment of LDL receptor-targeted peptide or with the liposome uptake, either by simple endocytosis or LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationActivators of endogenous NO synthesis, such as lipopolysaccharide, TNF-a and endothelin-1, as well as the NO donor SNP, affect Pgp/ABCB1 in rat brain capillaries, producing a decrease in transporter expression and activity after 3 h followed by an increase at 6 h.
“Activators of endogenous NO synthesis, such as lipopolysaccharide, TNF-a and endothelin-1, as well as the NO donor SNP, are known to affect Pgp/ABCB1 in rat brain capillaries, producing a decrease in the transporter expression and activity after a 3 h incubation (Bauer et al., 2007;Hartz et al., 2007) followed by an increase at 6 h (Bauer et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bauer et al., 2007 source
- cites Hartz et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationApo-Lipodox is internalized efficiently via LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and is less extruded by Pgp/ABCB1 in solid tumour cells.
“We have previously shown that anionic pegylated liposomes loaded with doxorubicin and conjugated with a synthetic peptide containing the LDL receptor-binding site from human apo-B100 (the so-called 'apo-Lipodox') was internalized efficiently via a LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and was less extruded by Pgp/ABCB1 in solid tumour cells (Kopecka et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kopecka et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationChemical modifications and improvements of drug-loaded nanoparticles are under intensive investigations.
“For this reason, chemical modifications and improvements of drugloaded nanoparticles are under intensive investigations (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007;Guo et al., 2011;Wohlfart et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe presented results are representative of multiple independent experiments with similar results.
“The figure is representative of three experiments with superimposable results.”
- Also stated in: § BJP · plain
“The figures shown here are representative of three similar experiments performed in duplicate.”
- Also stated in: § BJP · plain
“The figures shown here are representative of 3 similar experiments, performed in triplicate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § BJP · plain
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningThe 'Trojan horse' approach (statins followed by LDL receptor-targeting liposomal drug) might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different CNS diseases.
“In a general perspective, our 'Trojan horse' approach, based on the administration of statins followed by a LDL receptortargeting liposomal drug, might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different CNS diseases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Poor permeability across the BBB also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataGAPDH expression was used to check equal protein loading in Western blots.
“The expression of GAPDH was used to check the equal protein loading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Passage of drugs across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours.
“The passage of drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Doxorubicin is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro.
“Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Doxorubicin is ineffective clinically at treating glioblastoma.
“Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No data exist on the effects of statins on the metabolism and permeability of BBB cells.
“To our knowledge, no data exist on the effects of statins on the metabolism and permeability of BBB cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hCMEC/D3 cell line is a suitable in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier.
“The hCMEC/D3 cells, a human brain microvascular endothelial cell line, were cultured as previously described (Weksler et al., 2005).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Permeability measured across hCMEC/D3 cell monolayers reflects drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier in vivo.
“The permeability to inulin, taken as a parameter of the integrity of the tight junctions (Monnaert et al., 2004), was measured on hCMEC/D3 cells seeded at 50 000•cm -2 and grown for 7 days up to confluence in 6-multiwell Transwell devices (0.4 mm diameter pores-size, Corning Life Sciences, Chorges, BJP ML Pinzón-Daza et al.France).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The co-culture of hCMEC/D3 cells with tumour cells in Transwell devices reflects drug delivery to brain tumours in vivo.
“The hCMEC/D3 cells (50 000•cm -2 ) were grown for 7 days up to confluence in 6-multiwell Transwell devices (0.4 mm diameter pores-size), whereas in the lower chamber, 500 000 cells (U87-MG, SJKNP, A549 or MDA-MB-231 cells) were seeded at day 4.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Doxorubicin is transported by Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2.
“As doxorubicin is transported by Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its ability to cross the BBB cells is poor in vivo”
The paper relies on this without support.
The abundance of ABC transporters on primary CNS tumours, cerebral metastasis of epithelial solid tumours and on BBB cells determines a poor response to chemotherapy.
“The abundance of ABC transporters on primary CNS tumours, on cerebral metastasis of epithelial solid tumours and on BBB cells determines a poor response to chemotherapy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The low drug delivery across BBB and the low drug accumulation within the tumour are among the main factors that decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy in primary and metastatic brain tumours.
“The low drug delivery across BBB and the low drug accumulation within the tumour are among the main factors that decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy in primary and metastatic brain tumours.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Whether statins have effects on the transport functions of brain microvascular endothelium has not been investigated.
“to our knowledge, whether they have effects on the transport functions of brain microvascular endothelium has not been investigated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A high blood flow usually ensures better delivery of anticancer drugs within tumour areas and better tumour oxygenation enhances the cytotoxicity of many anticancer drugs including doxorubicin.
“A high blood flow usually ensures better delivery of anticancer drugs within tumour areas and better tumour oxygenation enhances the cytotoxicity of many anticancer drugs including doxorubicin.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Both statins and liposomal drugs have chemosensitizer properties in solid tumours.
“both statins and liposomal drugs have chemosensitizer properties in solid tumours”
The paper relies on this without support.
Liposomal drugs are delivered across the BBB more easily than free drugs.
“liposomal drugs are delivered across the BBB more easily than free drugs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Poor permeability across the BBB also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.
“The problem of poor permeability across the BBB is not limited to anticancer drugs, but also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting simvastatin dose for Figure S3D
MinorThe Results describe the Figure S3D permeability experiment as using 0.1 mmol•L -1 simvastatin for 48 h, but the Figure S3D caption specifies 5 mmol•L -1 for the same treatment.
“Furthermore, when we co-incubated free doxorubicin with empty liposomes, with or without the LDL receptor-targeted peptide, in hCMEC/D3 cells pretreated or not with simvastatin (0.1 mmol•L -1 for 48 h), we did not detect a different permeability compared with free doxorubicin alone (Supporting information Figure S3D).”
“The hCMEC/D3 cells were grown up to the confluence for 7 days in Transwell insert, in fresh medium or in the presence of simvastatin (5 mmol•L -1 for 48 h; SIM); then 5 mmol•L -1 doxorubicin (DOXO), alone or co-incubated with 5 mmol•L -1 empty anionic pegylated liposomes (EL) or empty anionic pegylated LDL receptor-targeted conjugated-liposomes (apoEL), were added in the upper chamber.”
Citations
Cites
Provencher, S. W. (1982) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(82)90173-4 · Cited by 2,704
PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS OF STATINS
Liao, J. K., & Laufs, U. (2005) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095748 · Cited by 1,994
Blood‐brain barrier‐specific properties of a human adult brain endothelial cell line
Weksler, B. B., Subileau, E.-A., Perrière, N., Charneau, P., Holloway, K. E., Leveque, M., Tricoire-Leignel, H., Nicotra, A., Bourdoulous, S., Turowski, P., et al. (2005) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.04-3458fje · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationThe Blood-Brain Barrier and Cancer: Transporters, Treatment, and Trojan Horses
Deeken, J. F., & Löscher, W. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-2854 · Cited by 724
Regulation of the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase
Pautz, A., Art, J., Hahn, S., Nowag, S., Voss, C., & Kleinert, H. (2010) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/j.niox.2010.04.007 · Cited by 549
Rho GTPases, Statins, and Nitric Oxide
Rikitake, Y., & Liao, J. K. (2005) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000196564.18314.23 · Cited by 475
Multi-functional nanocarriers to overcome tumor drug resistance
Milane, L. S., van Vlerken, L. E., Yadav, S. K., & Amiji, M. M. (2008) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.04.003 · Cited by 409
Inhibition of Rho Kinase (ROCK) Leads to Increased Cerebral Blood Flow and Stroke Protection
Rikitake, Y., Kim, H.-H., Huang, Z., Seto, M., Yano, K., Asano, T., Moskowitz, M. A., & Liao, J. K. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000181077.84981.11 · Cited by 375
Molecularly targeted therapy for malignant glioma
Sathornsumetee, S., Reardon, D. A., Desjardins, A., Quinn, J. A., Vredenburgh, J. J., & Rich, J. N. (2007) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22741 · Cited by 330
Michaelis, K., Hoffmann, M. M., Dreis, S., Herbert, E., Alyautdin, R. N., Michaelis, M., Kreuter, J., & Langer, K. (2006) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.105.097139 · Cited by 303
Bauer, B., Hartz, A. M. S., & Miller, D. S. (2007) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.106.029512 · Cited by 275
Riganti, C., Miraglia, E., Viarisio, D., Costamagna, C., Pescarmona, G., Ghigo, D., & Bosia, A. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.516.65.2 · Cited by 271
Self-citationMolecular sieving characteristics of the cultured endothelial monolayer
Siflinger-Birnboim, A., Vecchio, P. J. D., Cooper, J. A., Blumenstock, F. A., Shepard, J. M., & Malik, A. B. (1987) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.1041320115 · Cited by 256
Nitric oxide donors: Novel cancer therapeutics (Review)
Huerta, S. (1992) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo_00000079 · Cited by 223
Hartz, A. M. S., Bauer, B., Fricker, G., & Miller, D. S. (2005) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.105.017954 · Cited by 203
Medulloblastoma: From Molecular Pathology to Therapy
Rossi, A., Caracciolo, V., Russo, G. M., Reiss, K., & Giordano, A. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-2072 · Cited by 179
Wong, H. L., Bendayan, R., Rauth, A. M., & Wu, X. Y. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20100 · Cited by 177
Targeting Rho in Cardiovascular Disease
Laufs, U., & Liao, J. K. (2000) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.87.7.526 · Cited by 173
Kim, H. R., Andrieux, K., Gil, S., Taverna, M., Chacun, H., Desmaële, D., Taran, F., Georgin, D., & Couvreur, P. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm060711a · Cited by 170
Beier, C. P., Schmid, C., Gorlia, T., Kleinletzenberger, C., Beier, D., Grauer, O., Steinbrecher, A., Hirschmann, B., Brawanski, A., Dietmaier, C., et al. (2009) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-308 · Cited by 125
Ambruosi, A., Khalansky, A. S., Yamamoto, H., Gelperina, S. E., Begley, D. J., & Kreuter, J. (2006) · Journal of Drug Targeting · doi:10.1080/10611860600636135 · Cited by 119
Synthetic nano-low density lipoprotein as targeted drug delivery vehicle for glioblastoma multiforme
Nikanjam, M., Blakely, E. A., Bjornstad, K. A., Shu, X., Budinger, T. F., & Forte, T. M. (2006) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.07.046 · Cited by 118
Modulation of Cellular Cholesterol Alters P-Glycoprotein Activity in Multidrug-Resistant Cells
Troost, J., Lindenmaier, H., Haefeli, W. E., & Weiß, J. (2004) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.104.002329 · Cited by 118
Ananda, S., Nowak, A. K., Cher, L., Dowling, A., Brown, C., Simes, J., & Rosenthal, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.026 · Cited by 116
Yanae, M., Tsubaki, M., Satou, T., Itoh, T., Imano, M., Yamazoe, Y., & Nishida, S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/1756-9966-30-74 · Cited by 110
Ahn, K. S., Sethi, G., Chaturvedi, M. M., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23745 · Cited by 109
Tai, L. M., Loughlin, A. J., Male, D. K., & Romero, I. A. (2009) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.42 · Cited by 108
Self-citationHawkins, B. T., Sykes, D. B., & Miller, D. S. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5103-09.2010 · Cited by 107
Kinetics of transport of doxorubicin bound to nanoparticles across the blood–brain barrier
Wohlfart, S., Khalansky, A. S., Gelperina, S. E., Begley, D. J., & Kreuter, J. (2011) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.010 · Cited by 102
Carl, S. M., Lindley, D. J., Couraud, P. O., Weksler, B. B., Romero, I., Mowery, S. A., & Knipp, G. T. (2010) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp900178j · Cited by 88
Self-citationRiganti, C., Voena, C., Kopecka, J., Corsetto, P. A., Montorfano, G., Enrico, E., Costamagna, C., Rizzo, A. M., Ghigo, D., & Bosia, A. (2011) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp2001389 · Cited by 86
Self-citationABC Transporters: Unvalidated Therapeutic Targets in Cancer and the CNS
W. Robey, R., R. Massey, P., Amiri-Kordestani, L., & E. Bates, S. (2010) · Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/187152010794473957 · Cited by 85
Statin Treatment Upregulates Vascular Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Through Akt/NF-κB Pathway
Nakata, S., Tsutsui, M., Shimokawa, H., Yamashita, T., Tanimoto, A., Tasaki, H., Ozumi, K., Sabanai, K., Morishita, T., Suda, O., et al. (2006) · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.0000251615.61858.33 · Cited by 85
Ye, Y., Martinez, J. D., Perez‐Polo, R. J., Lin, Y., Uretsky, B. F., & Birnbaum, Y. (2008) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01350.2007 · Cited by 81
Guo, L., Fan, L., Pang, Z., Ren, J., Ren, Y., Li, J., Chen, J., Wen, Z., & Jiang, X. (2011) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.008 · Cited by 75
Salkeni, M. A., Lynch, J. L., Price, T. O., & Banks, W. A. (2008) · Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s11481-008-9138-y · Cited by 72
Role of ABC Transporters in the Chemoresistance of Human Gliomas
Decleves, X., Amiel, A., Delattre, J.-Y., & Scherrmann, J.-M. (2006) · Current Cancer Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/156800906777723930 · Cited by 65
A LDL-masked liposomal-doxorubicin reverses drug resistance in human cancer cells
Kopecka, J., Campia, I., Olivero, P., Pescarmona, G., Ghigo, D., Bosìa, A., & Riganti, C. (2010) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.003 · Cited by 59
Self-citationRiganti, C., Doublier, S., Costamagna, C., Aldieri, E., Pescarmona, G., Ghigo, D., & Bosia, A. (2008) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.108.045286 · Cited by 58
Self-citationBerger–Sieczkowski, E., Lehner, C., Ambros, P. F., & HOHENEGGER, M. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24885 · Cited by 54
Monnaert, V., Betbeder, D., Fénart, L., Bricout, H., Lenfant, A., Landry, C., Cecchelli, R., Monflier, É., & Tilloy, S. (2004) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.104.071845 · Cited by 53
RhoA Silencing Reverts the Resistance to Doxorubicin in Human Colon Cancer Cells
Doublier, S., Riganti, C., Voena, C., Costamagna, C., Aldieri, E., Pescarmona, G., Ghigo, D., & Bosìa, A. (2008) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-08-0251 · Cited by 50
Self-citationStatins revert doxorubicin resistance via nitric oxide in malignant mesothelioma
Riganti, C., Orecchia, S., Pescarmona, G., Betta, P. G., Ghigo, D., & Bosia, A. (2006) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.21832 · Cited by 48
Self-citationRattan, R., Giri, S., Singh, A. K., & Singh, I. (2003) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00459-3 · Cited by 46
Targeted Therapies for Malignant Glioma: Progress and Potential
Mercer, R. W., Tyler, M. A., Ulasov, I. V., & Lesniak, M. S. (2009) · BioDrugs · doi:10.2165/00063030-200923010-00003 · Cited by 39
Cell-cycle-dependent turnover of P-glycoprotein in multidrug-resistant cells
Zhang, W., & Ling, V. W. T. (2000) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(200007)184:1 · Cited by 36
Nakagawa, T., Ido, K., Sakuma, T., Takeuchi, H., Sato, K., & Kubota, T. (2008) · Neuropathology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1789.2008.00983.x · Cited by 33
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Recurrent Malignant Glioma: Analysis of a Case Series
Glas, M., Koch, H., Hirschmann, B., Jauch, T., Steinbrecher, A., Herrlinger, U., Bogdahn, U., & Hau, P. (2007) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000113052 · Cited by 30
(2009) · PubMed
Ananda, S., Nowak, A. K., Cher, L., Dowling, A. J., Brown, C., Simes, R. J., & Rosenthal, M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.2072
Guo, L., Fan, L., Ren, J., Pang, Z., Ren, Y., Li, J., Wen, Z., & Jiang, X. (2011) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/26/265105
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The hCMEC/D3 cell line as a model of the human blood brain barrier
Weksler, B., Romero, I. A., & Couraud, P.-O. (2013) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-10-16 · Cited by 753
Self-citationNanoparticles and targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy
Bahrami, B., Hojjat‐Farsangi, M., Mohammadi, H., Anvari, E., Ghalamfarsa, G., Yousefi, M., & Jadidi‐Niaragh, F. (2017) · Immunology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2017.07.015 · Cited by 521
Han, L., & Jiang, C. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2020.11.023 · Cited by 358
Blood–Brain Barrier in Brain Tumors: Biology and Clinical Relevance
Mo, F., Pellerino, A., Soffietti, R., & Rudà, R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222312654 · Cited by 257
Nanoscale drug delivery systems and the blood–brain barrier
Khalin, I., Alyautdin, R., Ismail, N. M., Haron, M. H., & Kuznetsov, D. (2014) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s52236 · Cited by 204
Morris, M. E., Rodriguez‐Cruz, V., & Felmlee, M. A. (2017) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-017-0110-8 · Cited by 188
Teixeira, M. I., Lopes, C. M., Amaral, M. H., & Costa, P. C. (2023) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112999 · Cited by 154
Hsu, J., Chu, S., Liao, C.-C., Wang, C., Wang, Y.-S., Lai, M., Wang, H.-C., Huang, H., & Tsai, M.-H. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13020195 · Cited by 159
Bana, L., Minniti, S., Salvati, E., Sesana, S., Zambelli, V., Cagnotto, A., Orlando, A., Cazzaniga, E., Zwart, R., Scheper, W., et al. (2013) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2013.12.001 · Cited by 153
New Insights Into Targeting Membrane Lipids for Cancer Therapy
Preta, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.571237 · Cited by 132
Moura, R. P., Martins, C., Pinto, S. F. T., Sousa, F., & Sarmento, B. F. C. C. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2019.1583205 · Cited by 127
Battaglia, L., Gallarate, M., Peira, E., Chirio, D., Muntoni, E., Biasibetti, E., Capucchio, M. T., Valazza, A., Panciani, P. P., Lanotte, M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.24002 · Cited by 98
Self-citationTranscellular brain drug delivery: A review on recent advancements
Azarmi, M., Maleki, H., Nikkam, N., & Malekinejad, H. (2020) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119582 · Cited by 96
A review on in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) based on hCMEC/D3 cells
Qi, D., Lin, H., Hu, B., & Wei, Y. (2023) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.04.020 · Cited by 93
Challenges and Recent Advances in Medulloblastoma Therapy
Kumar, V., Kumar, V., McGuire, T. R., Coulter, D. W., Sharp, J. G., & Mahato, R. I. (2017) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2017.09.002 · Cited by 85
Nanoparticle-mediated growth factor delivery systems: A new way to treat Alzheimer's disease
Lauzon, M.-A., Daviau, A., Marcos, B., & Faucheux, N. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.024 · Cited by 66
In vitro screening of nanomedicines through the blood brain barrier: A critical review
Aparicio-Blanco, J., Martín‐Sabroso, C., & Torres‐Suárez, A. I. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.051 · Cited by 64
Low-density lipoprotein nanomedicines: mechanisms of targeting, biology, and theranostic potential
Di, L., & Maiseyeu, A. (2021) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/10717544.2021.1886199 · Cited by 63
FAM49B, a novel regulator of mitochondrial function and integrity that suppresses tumor metastasis
Chattaragada, M. S., Riganti, C., Sassoé‐Pognetto, M., Principe, M., Santamorena, M. M., Roux, C., Curcio, C., Evangelista, A., Allavena, P., Salvia, R., et al. (2017) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2017.358 · Cited by 62
Self-citationRiganti, C., Salaroglio, I. C., Pinzón‐Daza, M. L., Caldera, V., Campia, I., Kopecka, J., Mellai, M., Annovazzi, L., Couraud, P., Bosìa, A., et al. (2013) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1397-y · Cited by 60
Self-citationLDL receptors and their role in targeted therapy for glioma: a review
Pawar, S., Koneru, T., McCord, E., Tatiparti, K., Sau, S., & Iyer, A. K. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.02.008 · Cited by 56
Pinzón‐Daza, M. L., Salaroglio, I. C., Kopecka, J., Garzón, R., Couraud, P., Ghigo, D., & Riganti, C. (2014) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.100 · Cited by 56
Self-citationCai, H., Liu, W., Xue, Y., Shang, X., Liu, J., Li, Z., Wang, P., Liu, L., Hu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2014) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0000000000000146 · Cited by 51
On, N. H., & Miller, D. W. (2014) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/13816128113199990458 · Cited by 47
Beg, S., Jain, S., Kushwah, V., Bhatti, G. K., Sandhu, P. S., Katare, O. P., & Singh, B. (2017) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-0336 · Cited by 47
Ivask, A., Pilkington, E. H., Blin, T., Käkinen, A., Vija, H., Visnapuu, M., Quinn, J. F., Whittaker, M. R., Qiao, R., Davis, T. P., et al. (2017) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c7bm01012e · Cited by 46
Mfsd2a-based pharmacological strategies for drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier
Wang, J.-Z., Xiao, N., Zhang, Y.-Z., Zhao, C., Guo, X., & Lu, L.-M. (2015) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2015.12.024 · Cited by 45
Low density lipoproteins mediated nanoplatforms for cancer targeting
Jain, A., Jain, K., Kesharwani, P., & Jain, N. K. (2013) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1888-7 · Cited by 42
Mahringer, A., Puris, E., & Fricker, G. (2021) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105017 · Cited by 39
Gazzano, E., Lazzarato, L., Rolando, B., Kopecka, J., Guglielmo, S., Costamagna, C., Chegaev, K. Y., & Riganti, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00580 · Cited by 38
Self-citationUse of Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Treatment: a New Approach
Játiva, P., & Ceña, V. (2017) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0223 · Cited by 36
SPION and doxorubicin-loaded polymeric nanocarriers for glioblastoma theranostics
Luque-Michel, E., Lemaire, L. P., & Blanco‐Prieto, M. J. (2021) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-020-00880-8 · Cited by 31
Lipoproteins tethered dendrimeric nanoconstructs for effective targeting to cancer cells
Jain, A., Jain, K., Mehra, N. K., & Jain, N. K. (2013) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2003-9 · Cited by 31
Designing the future of nanomedicine: current barriers to targeted brain therapeutics
Herda, L. M., Polo, E., Kelly, P. M., Rocks, L., Hudecz, D., & Dawson, K. A. (2014) · European Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.1515/ejnm-2014-0022 · Cited by 30
Liposomal Nitrooxy-Doxorubicin: One Step over Caelyx in Drug-Resistant Human Cancer Cells
Pedrini, I., Gazzano, E., Chegaev, K. Y., Rolando, B., Marengo, A., Kopecka, J., Fruttero, R., Ghigo, D., Arpicco, S., & Riganti, C. (2014) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp500257s · Cited by 30
Self-citationAhmed, T., Liu, F.-C. F., He, C., Abbasi, A. Z., Cai, P., Rauth, A. M., Henderson, J. T., & Wu, X. Y. (2021) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-021-03122-9 · Cited by 28
Is oral lipid-based delivery for drug targeting to the brain feasible?
Brookes, A., Ji, L., Bradshaw, T. D., Stocks, M. J., Gray, D. A., Butler, J., & Gershkovich, P. (2022) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.02.004 · Cited by 28
Gregori, M., Orlando, A., Re, F., Sesana, S., Nardo, L., Salerno, D., Mantegazza, F., Salvati, E., Zito, A., Malavasi, F., et al. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.009 · Cited by 28
Wang, C.-W., Huang, C.-C., Chou, P., Chang, Y.-P., Wei, S. D., Guengerich, F. P., Chou, Y., Wang, S., Lai, P., Souček, P., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19789 · Cited by 28
Liu, L., ZUO, L. F., & GUO, J. W. (2014) · Molecular Medicine Reports · doi:10.3892/mmr.2014.1949 · Cited by 27
Therapeutic performance of temozolomide-loaded nanomaterials: A state-of-the-art
Pourmadadi, M., Shamsabadipour, A., Bhatti, A. R., Forouzanfar, M., Rajabnejad, M., Behzadmehr, R., Rahdar, A., Medina, D. I., & Diez-Pascual, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104568 · Cited by 25
Nanotechnology to augment immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme
Ung, N. M., & Yang, I. (2015) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1814-1 · Cited by 25
Salaroglio, I. C., Abate, C., Rolando, B., Battaglia, L., Gazzano, E., Colombino, E., Costamagna, C., Annovazzi, L., Mellai, M., Berardi, F., et al. (2019) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00018 · Cited by 23
Self-citationFluorescent Alloyed CdZnSeS/ZnS Nanosensor for Doxorubicin Detection
Mescheryakova, S. A., Matlakhov, I. S., Strokin, P. D., Drozd, D. D., Goryacheva, I. Y., & Goryacheva, O. A. (2023) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios13060596 · Cited by 22
Drug resistance in glioblastoma: Challenges, mechanisms and therapeutic strategies (Review)
Durga, Y., & Pusapati, R. V. (2025) · Molecular and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.3892/mco.2025.2913 · Cited by 20
Wu, Y., Wang, S., Shang, L., Zhang, H., Qin, J., Ren, Y., & Ye, T. (2018) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2018-0282 · Cited by 20
A decade's worth of impact: Dox loaded liposomes in anticancer activity
Ghosh, P., Tiwari, H., Lakkakula, J., Roy, A., Emran, T. B., Rashid, S., Alghamdi, S. A., Rajab, B. S., Almehmadi, M. M., Allahyani, M. A., et al. (2022) · Materials Today Advances · doi:10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100313 · Cited by 18
Silant’ev, V. E., Belousov, A. S., Trukhin, F. O., Struppul, N. E., Shmelev, M. E., Patlay, A. A., Shatilov, R. A., & Kumeiko, V. V. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12071393 · Cited by 18
Salaroglio, I. C., Gazzano, E., Kopecka, J., Chegaev, K. Y., Costamagna, C., Fruttero, R., Guglielmo, S., & Riganti, C. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23061401 · Cited by 18
Self-citationThymine-Modified Nanocarrier for Doxorubicin Delivery in Glioblastoma Cells
Ziganshinа, A. Y., Mansurova, E. E., Voloshina, A. D., Lyubina, A. P., Amerhanova, S. K., Shulaeva, M. M., Nizameev, I. R., Kadirov, M. K., Bakhtiozina, L. R., Semenov, V. E., et al. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28020551 · Cited by 17
Jaragh-Alhadad, L. A., Samir, M., Harford, T. J., & Karnik, S. S. (2022) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/10717544.2022.2096713 · Cited by 17
Inamura, A., Adachi, Y., Inoue, T., He, Y., Tokuda, N., Nawata, T., Shirao, S., Nomura, S., Fujii, M., Ikeda, E., et al. (2013) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-013-1066-4 · Cited by 17
Sultan, A. M., Ling, B., Zhang, H., Ma, B., Michel, D. L., Alcorn, J., & Yang, J. P. (2013) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.5956 · Cited by 17
Nanomedicines and stroke: Toward translational research
Gaudin, A., Andrieux, K., & Couvreur, P. (2015) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2015.07.018 · Cited by 16
Nature vs. Manmade: Comparing Exosomes and Liposomes for Traumatic Brain Injury
Hennigan, K., & Lavik, E. (2023) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-023-00849-8 · Cited by 14
Low-density lipoprotein: a versatile nanoscale platform for targeted delivery
Dai, L., Li, S., Hao, Q., Zhou, R., Zhou, H., Lei, W., Kang, H., Wu, H., Li, Y., & Ma, X. (2023) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d2na00883a · Cited by 14
Gurudevan, S., Kanwar, R., Veedu, R. N., Sasidharan, S., Kennedy, R. D., Walder, K. R., Neerati, P., & Kanwar, J. R. (2013) · Current Gene Therapy · doi:10.2174/156652321305131212123558 · Cited by 13
Pathways for Drug Delivery to the Central Nervous System
On, N. H., Yathindranath, V., Sun, Z., & Miller, D. W. (2016) · Drug Delivery · doi:10.1002/9781118833322.ch16 · Cited by 11
Adekeye, A., Needham, D., & Rahman, R. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020599 · Cited by 8
Thiazole Derivatives as Promising Candidates for Cryptococcosis Therapy
Leocádio, V. A. T., Miranda, I., Magalhães, M. H. C., dos Santos, V. S., Gonçalves, J. E., de Oliveira, R. B., Maltarollo, V. G., Bastos, R. W., Goldman, G. H., Johann, S., et al. (2025) · ACS Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00732 · Cited by 8
The research progress on meningeal metastasis in solid tumors
Yue, Y., Ren, Y., Lu, C., Jiang, N., Wang, S., Fu, J., Kong, M., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-025-01950-4 · Cited by 8
Ricca, A., Cascino, F., Morena, F., Martino, S., & Gritti, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00167 · Cited by 8
Maisto, N., & Mango, D. (2024) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101057 · Cited by 7
Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems to Overcome the Blood–Brain Barrier
Tagami, T., Taki, M., & Ozeki, T. (2015) · Methods in pharmacology and toxicology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3121-7_17 · Cited by 7
Association between DNA methylation and multidrug resistance in human glioma SHG-44 cells
Chen, J., Xu, Z. Y., & Wang, F. (2014) · Molecular Medicine Reports · doi:10.3892/mmr.2014.2690 · Cited by 6
Identification of Receptor Ligands in Apo B100 Reveals Potential Functional Domains
Guevara, J., Romo, J., Hernandez, E., & Guevara, J. (2018) · The Protein Journal · doi:10.1007/s10930-018-9792-8 · Cited by 5
Statin and Fibrate‐Induced Dichotomy of Mitochondrial Function
Neergheen, V., Dyson, A., Wainwright, L., & Hargreaves, I. P. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119329725.ch30 · Cited by 4
How does “Protein Corona” Affect the In vivo Efficiency of Polymeric Nanoparticles? State of Art
(2017) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9781681084930117020011 · Cited by 4
Editorial: Targeting Lipid Rafts as a Strategy Against Infection and Cancer
Garofalo, T., Misasi, R., & Preta, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.748905 · Cited by 4
Ligand Nanoparticle Conjugation Approach for Targeted Cancer Chemotherapy
Sarma, A., Das, M. K., & Chakraborty, T. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6255-6_15 · Cited by 3
How does “Protein Corona” Affect the In vivo Efficiency of Polymeric Nanoparticles? State of Art
Pederzoli, F., Galliani, M., Forni, F., Vandelli, M. A., Belletti, D., Tosi, G., & Ruozi, B. (2017) · IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) · doi:10.2174/97816810849301170201 · Cited by 3
Brain Cancer Receptors and Targeting Strategies
John, R., Vaswani, H., Dandekar, P. P., & Devarajan, P. V. (2019) · AAPS advances in the pharmaceutical sciences series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29168-6_2 · Cited by 3
Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance of glioblastoma part 1: ABC family proteins and inhibitors
Chernov, A. N., & Валерьевна, Ш. О. (2021) · Medical academic journal · doi:10.17816/maj83049 · Cited by 2
In vitro blood-brain barrier models for the study of brain shuttle peptide transport
Martins, A. F., Santa-Maria, A. R., Kucsápszky, N., Góes, L. S. B. D. B., Molnár, K. C., Fortes, S. S. G., Carrilho, E., Deli, M. A., & Walter, F. R. (2026) · Advances in pharmacology · doi:10.1016/bs.apha.2026.01.003 · Cited by 1
Nanotherapeutics in Multidrug Resistance
Han, M. Y., & Gao, J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7876-8_15 · Cited by 1
Aquaporin, Midkine and Glioblastoma
Ergüven, M. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/52429
Developing Arterial Drugs: Lessons from the Hepatic Artery and Other Arterial Injections
Baig, A., Gamblin, T. C., Bello, R. J., & Joshi, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80173-0_12
Thermoresponsive nanocarrier(s)-based therapy for glioblastoma
Joshi, S., Jindal, P., Aggarwal, K., Thakur, R., Singh, N. K., Patel, P., Kurmi, B. D., & Shirvalilou, S. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-33319-4.00009-4
EFFECT OF THE CELL POLARIZATION ON ENDOCYTIC PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BRAIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS
Partti, S. (2014) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja
Brookes, A. (2023) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)
LDL Receptors and their Impact in Targeted Therapies for Brain Tumors
Tiwari, A., & Samal, P. K. (2025) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9798898811716125010005
Saraswat, A., Nomani, A., Rayaprolu, B. M., Bhalla, A. S., & Shameem, M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36453-2.00004-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinzón‐Daza, M., Garzón, R., Couraud, P., Romero, I., Weksler, B., Ghigo, D., Bosia, A., & Riganti, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidad del Rosario (CO)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Riganti, C
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-06
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1431-1447
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- PMC
- PMC3514758
- OpenAlex
- W1489719702
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Compagnia di San Paolo (2008.1136)
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (MFAG 11475)
- Università degli Studi di Torino
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- statins, doxorubicin, blood-brain barrier, LDL receptor, liposomes, glioblastoma, P-glycoprotein, ABCG2, multidrug resistance, nitric oxide, Trojan horse, drug delivery, brain tumors, hCMEC/D3 cells, nanoparticle drug delivery
- MeSH terms
- Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Line, Doxorubicin, Humans, Liposomes, Lovastatin, Nitrites, Receptors, LDL, NF-kappa B, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, rho-Associated Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review