Cited by 84Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 18 of the 62 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The association of statins plus LDL receptor‐targeted liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin increases in vitro drug delivery across blood–brain barrier cells

Open access
Pinzón‐Daza, ML, Garzón, R, Couraud, PO, Romero, IA, Weksler, B, Ghigo, D, Bosia, A, Riganti, C·2012·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The passage of drugs across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours. For instance, the anticancer drug doxorubicin, which is effective against glioblastoma in vitro, has poor efficacy in vivo, because it is extruded by P‐glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance‐related proteins and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in BBB cells. The aim of this study was to convert poorly permeant drugs like doxorubicin into drugs able to cross the BBB. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Experiments were performed on primary human cerebral microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells, alone and co‐cultured with human brain and epithelial tumour cells. KEY RESULTS Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters. Statins also increased the number of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors exposed on the surface of BBB cells, as well as on tumour cells like human glioblastoma. We showed that the association of statins plus drug‐loaded nanoparticles engineered as LDLs was effective as a vehicle for non‐permeant drugs like doxorubicin to cross the BBB, allowing its delivery into primary and metastatic brain tumour cells and to achieve significant anti‐tumour cytotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS We suggest that our ‘Trojan horse’ approach, based on the administration of statins plus a LDL receptor‐targeted liposomal drug, might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different brain diseases for which the BBB represents an obstacle.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In hCMEC/D3 blood–brain barrier cells, statins increased NO, nitrated and inhibited Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2, and raised surface LDL receptors; combining statins with LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin (apo-Lipodox) increased doxorubicin permeability across BBB monolayers and delivery/cytotoxicity in co-cultured brain and epithelial tumour cells. The authors propose this “Trojan horse” statin plus apo-Lipodox strategy as a potential way to overcome BBB and ABC-transporter barriers, pending in vivo validation.

Key findings

  • Mevastatin and simvastatin (0.1 mmol·L−1) reduced cholesterol and GGPP synthesis, lowered RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, activated NF-κB/iNOS, and increased NOS activity and nitrite; this was accompanied by tyrosine nitration of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and decreased ATPase activity, whereas MRP1/ABCC1 was not nitrated or inhibited.
  • Statins increased LDL receptor mRNA at 24 h and surface LDL receptor protein at 48 h; apo-Lipodox had a mean LDL receptor-targeted peptide concentration of 20 ± 1.6 µg·mL−1 (about 3 × 10^12 peptides·mL−1) and a radius of 72.05 ± 23.14 nm, and its permeability across hCMEC/D3 cells was higher than free doxorubicin, further increased by statins, and blocked by the NO scavenger PTIO or competing free apoB100 peptide.
  • In Transwell co-cultures with U87-MG, SJKNP, A549, and MDA-MB-231 cells, simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox produced the highest intracellular doxorubicin accumulation, LDH release, and caspase-3 activation; free doxorubicin alone showed little delivery or cytotoxicity.

Methods

  • Primary human cerebral microvascular endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were studied alone and co-cultured in Transwell inserts with human glioblastoma U87-MG, neuroblastoma SJKNP, breast cancer MDA-MB-231, and lung cancer A549 cells.
  • Assays included cholesterol/GGPP synthesis, membrane cholesterol, RhoA/RhoA kinase activity, NF-κB activity, NOS activity/nitrite, Western blot and immunoprecipitation for nitrated ABC transporters, ABC transporter ATPase activity, rhodamine 123 and Hoechst 33342 efflux, LDL receptor RT-PCR and flow cytometry, liposome synthesis/characterization, permeability coefficients, intracellular doxorubicin, LDH release, and caspase-3 activation.
  • Data are presented as means ± SD and analyzed by one-way ANOVA, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • The paper states that all experiments are in vitro; the authors are currently testing the association in animal models to determine pharmacokinetics, optimal administration regimen, immunogenicity of apo-Lipodox, antitumour effect, and side effects, so in vivo feasibility and efficacy are not established here.
  • The authors state they cannot exclude earlier (<6 h) NO-mediated changes in Pgp/ABCB1 expression, other statin mechanisms such as decreased Pgp expression/glycosylation or reduced membrane cholesterol, and note that NO effects depend on species, amount, and rate of NO released.
  • The authors also state that the extent of increased drug delivery/toxicity varied among cell lines depending on ABC transporter and LDL receptor levels and other resistance mechanisms, and that tumour cells on the basal side may differently affect BBB permeability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02103.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

18 of 62 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Statins are reported to exert cytotoxic effects against CNS tumour cells.

    “Moreover statins are reported to exert cytotoxic effects against CNS tumour cells (Bababeygy et al., 2009;Yanae et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bababeygy et al., 2009
    • cites Yanae et al., 2011 source
  • Premisecitation

    By lowering de novo synthesis of cholesterol, statins force mammalian cells to expose the LDL receptor on their surface.

    “By lowering the de novo synthesis of cholesterol, statins force mammalian cells to expose the LDL receptor on their surface (Liao and Laufs, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liao and Laufs, 2005 source

      The Introduction says statins inhibit endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis and increase hepatic LDL receptor activity, which supports the claim’s basic mechanism. It does not say that statins force mammalian cells generally to display LDL receptors on their surface; its receptor finding is specific to the liver, and it describes activity rather than surface exposure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Increased production of NO elicited by statins reduces activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “the increased production of NO elicited by the statins reduced the activity of at least two proteins -Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 -that are involved in the apical extrusion of drugs in hCMEC/D3 cells (Tai et al., 2009) and in vivo (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tai et al., 2009 source
    • cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
    • cites Mercer et al., 2009 source

      Section 7 (page unavailable) says P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps can prevent drugs from crossing the blood–brain barrier, supporting the general point that these proteins limit drug entry. It does not say that statin-induced nitric oxide reduces P-glycoprotein or BCRP activity in vivo; the citing sentence attributes the hCMEC/D3-cell finding to a different source. (LLM, conf=0.80)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    hCMEC/D3 cells constitutively express Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, and BCRP/ABCG2.

    “hCMEC/D3 cells constitutively express several ABC transporters (Carl et al., 2010), like Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, BCRP/ ABCG2 (Figure 2A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carl et al., 2010 source
  • Premisecitation

    The brain microvascular endothelium has high levels of drug efflux pumps of the ABC transporter family.

    “In addition, having no fenestrations and many tight junctions, the brain microvascular endothelium has high levels of drug efflux pumps of the ABC transporter family (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
    • cites Mercer et al., 2009 source

      Section 7, “Challenges Associated with Targeted Therapies” (page unavailable), says that P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps impede some drugs from crossing the blood–brain barrier. It does not specify that brain microvascular endothelial cells have high levels of these pumps, or identify the pumps collectively as ABC transporters. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Robey et al., 2010 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    At low micromolar concentrations, mevastatin and simvastatin lower synthesis of isoprenoids in hCMEC/D3 cells and decrease activity of RhoGTPase.

    “At low (micromolar) concentrations, that is, in keeping with the K i of statins for 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (Liao and Laufs, 2005), mevastatin and simvastatin lowered the synthesis of isoprenoids in hCMEC/D3 cells and decreased the activity of RhoGTPase.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liao and Laufs, 2005 source

      The citation is attached to the assertion that low-micromolar concentrations are in keeping with statins’ inhibition constants, not to the citing authors’ hCMEC/D3 results. The Introduction instead reports a Ki of 1.4 nM for mevastatin and says statins bind HMG-CoA reductase at nanomolar concentrations; it is the natural substrate that binds at micromolar concentrations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Previous works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours.

    “Previous works from our group has shown that statins have chemosensitizing properties in epithelial tumours (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Kopecka et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Riganti et al., 2005 source
    • cites Riganti et al., 2006 source

      The Discussion reports that mevastatin and simvastatin potentiated doxorubicin-induced cell death in human malignant mesothelioma cells, supporting a chemosensitizing effect. The Cells section identifies these as mesothelial-origin cells; this paper does not establish the claim across epithelial tumours more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kopecka et al., 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In cancer cells, statins increase synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux, and decrease amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers activity of Pgp/ABCB1.

    “We have previously observed that in cancer cells, statins increase the synthesis of NO, which inhibits ABC transporters efflux (Riganti et al., 2005;Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008), and decrease the amount of membrane cholesterol, which also lowers the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 (Kopecka et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Riganti et al., 2005 source
    • cites Riganti et al., 2006 source
    • cites Riganti et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In solid tumours, a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene.

    “We observed in solid tumours that a decrease in GGPP reduces the activity of small GTPase of the RhoA family, activates the NF-kB transcription factor and up-regulates the inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS II) gene (Riganti et al., 2006;Riganti et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Riganti et al., 2006 source

      The Results and Discussion report that statins reduced active RhoA in human malignant mesothelioma cells and activated the IKK/NF-κB pathway; the paper also links this pathway to increased iNOS expression. But it does not establish that a measured decrease in GGPP caused the sequence, and its experiments in mesothelioma cells do not establish it across solid tumours generally. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Riganti et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Effects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type.

    “The effects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type (Nakata et al., 2007;Ahn et al., 2008;32: Ye et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Nakata et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ahn et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion passage describes RANKL-induced NF-κB signaling in osteoclastogenesis, and the IKK assay passage examines simvastatin’s effect in RAW 264.7 cells; neither addresses whether RhoA’s effects vary by cell type. Searches for RhoA and nitric oxide synthesis found no passage addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ye et al., 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Doxorubicin is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2.

    “Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
    • cites Mercer et al., 2009 source

      Section 7, “Challenges Associated with Targeted Therapies” (page unavailable), says that some small molecules are substrates of P-glycoprotein and other efflux pumps, limiting delivery across the blood-brain barrier. It does not identify doxorubicin as one of those molecules or say that it is a substrate of MRP1/ABCC1 or BCRP/ABCG2. Searches for doxorubicin and the named transporters found no passage establishing the specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Robey et al., 2010 source

      In “Could the Pgp inhibition hypothesis have been wrong?” (page unavailable), the paper reports that doxorubicin resistance in a mouse breast-cancer model was largely Pgp-mediated. The Introduction (page unavailable) says MRP1 confers resistance to anthracyclines, but it does not specifically identify doxorubicin as an MRP1 substrate; its list of ABCG2 substrates likewise does not include doxorubicin. The three-transporter claim is therefore not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Both tumour cells and BBB endothelial cells are rich in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, like P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-related proteins (MRPs/ABCCs) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) that extrude drugs from the luminal side of endothelial cells back into the blood and out of the tumour cells.

    “Both tumour cells and BBB endothelial cells are rich in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, like P-glycoprotein (Pgp/ABCB1), multidrug resistance-related proteins (MRPs/ABCCs) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) that extrude drugs from the luminal side of endothelial cells back into the blood and out of the tumour cells (Declèves et al., 2006;Mercer et al., 2009;Robey et al., 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Declèves et al., 2006 source
    • cites Mercer et al., 2009 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Robey et al., 2010 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Phase I/II trials with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin have shown that the drug has very few side effects and is well tolerated, but does not offer a significant advantage in overall survival or progression-free survival compared to standard protocols.

    “Phase I/II trials with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin have shown that the drug has very few side effects and is well tolerated, but does not offer a significant advantage in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival in comparison to the standard protocols based on radio-chemotherapy (Glas et al., 2007;Beier et al., 2009;Ananda et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Glas et al., 2007 source
    • cites Beier et al., 2009 source

      The Results (Activity of the combination regimen; page not provided) find no statistically significant improvement in progression-free or overall survival versus the historical radio-chemotherapy control. The Discussion calls overall toxicity acceptable, but the Results (Toxicity of the combination regimen) report cutaneous effects in almost all patients and substantial hematologic toxicity, so “very few side effects” overstates the findings. The trial tested PEG-Dox as part of a combination regimen, not the drug alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ananda et al., 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    A direct anti-tumour activity of statins against glioblastoma cells has been reported previously.

    “A direct anti-tumour activity of statins against glioblastoma cells has been reported previously (Bababeygy et al., 2009;Yanae et al., 2011)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bababeygy et al., 2009
    • cites Yanae et al., 2011 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Apo-Lipodox crosses the BBB monolayer at a significantly higher rate when hCMEC/D3 cells are pre-incubated with simvastatin, and this transport is dramatically decreased by competing free LDL receptor-targeted peptide.

    “However, apo-Lipodox crossed the BBB monolayer at a significantly higher rate when cells where pre-incubated with simvastatin, which increased the amount of LDL receptors (Figure 3A and B); this transport was dramatically decreased by the competing free LDL receptor-targeted peptide (Figure 3E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    Apo-Lipodox particles appear as round-shaped particles with electron-dense areas due to doxorubicin packed inside the liposomal shell.

    “We thus applied apo-Lipodox that appeared as round-shaped particles with electron-dense areas due to the doxorubicin packed inside the liposomal shell (Figure 3C)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Simvastatin does not modify the amount of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1, and BCRP/ABCG2 in these cell lines but increases surface LDL receptors.

    “simvastatin did not modify the amount of these transporters (Figure 4A) but increased the surface LDL receptors (Figure 4B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Intracellular content of free doxorubicin is low in all these cell lines and not sufficient to elicit cytotoxicity.

    “Whereas the intracellular content of free doxorubicin was low in all the cell lines (giving a fluorescence similar to the autofluorescence of untreated cells, Figure 4C) and not sufficient to elicit cytotoxicity (Figure 4C)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    NO elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2.

    “Statins reduced the efflux activity of Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 in hCMEC/D3 cells by increasing the synthesis of NO, which elicits the nitration of critical tyrosine residues on these transporters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    None of the liposomal formulations modified activation of NF-kB, synthesis of nitrite, activity of NOS enzyme, or induction of necrosis or apoptosis compared to untreated hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “None of the liposomal formulations modified the above parameters compared to the untreated cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In human BBB cells, mevastatin and simvastatin decrease synthesis of cholesterol and isoprenoids and reduce amount of cholesterol in plasma membrane.

    “We found here that in human BBB cells, the lipophilic statins mevastatin and simvastatin decreased the synthesis of cholesterol and isoprenoids and reduced the amount of cholesterol in plasma membrane.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    A strong decrease in membrane cholesterol caused by b-methyl-cyclodextrin impairs integrity of tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, but smaller variations produced by statins do not.

    “In our work, we observed that a strong decrease in membrane cholesterol, caused by b-methyl-cyclodextrin, actually impaired the integrity of tight junctions in hCMEC/D3 cells, but the smaller variations of membrane cholesterol produced by statins did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Pegylated and non-pegylated apo-Lipodox do not significantly differ in radius or in the amount of peptide attached.

    “These particles did not significantly differ in their radius (Table 1) or in the amount of peptide attached (22 Ϯ 1.9 mg•mL -1 ; n = 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Pgp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 show a low level of nitration in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells, whereas MRP1/ABCC1 shows no detectable nitration in each experimental condition.

    “Both these transporters also showed a low level of nitration in untreated cells, whereas no nitration was detectable on MRP1/ABCC1 in each experimental condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Apo-Lipodox is accumulated to a higher extent than free doxorubicin and exerts significant cell damage, as revealed by LDH release.

    “apo-Lipodox was accumulated to higher extent, exerting significant cell damage, as revealed by the release of LDH in the culture supernatant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Permeabilities of Lipodox and apo-Lipodox are similar in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells and are unaffected by an excess of free LDL receptor-targeted peptide under basal conditions.

    “The permeabilities of Lipodox (liposomal doxorubicin without the LDL receptor-targeted peptide) and apo-Lipodox were similar in untreated hCMEC/D3 cells and were unaffected by an excess of free LDL receptor-targeted peptide under basal conditions (Figure 3E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In BBB-tumour cell co-cultures, the association of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox is the most effective at achieving significant delivery of doxorubicin and inducing cell death by both necrosis and apoptosis.

    “association of simvastatin plus apo-Lipodox was the most effective at achieving a significant delivery of doxorubicin (Figure 5B) and inducing cell death by both necrosis (Figure 5B) and apoptosis (Figure 5C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Addition of simvastatin to free doxorubicin enhances drug retention and LDH release compared to doxorubicin alone.

    “The addition of simvastatin to free doxorubicin enhanced the drug retention and the LDH release compared to doxorubicin alone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The association of free doxorubicin plus statin or the use of apo-Lipodox are significantly less effective in the presence of a BBB monolayer than without it, although apo-Lipodox increases LDH release in all cell lines and induces caspase-3 activation in A549 and SJKNP cells.

    “The association of free doxorubicin plus statin or the use of apo-Lipodox, two experimental conditions that increased the intracellular amount of doxorubicin in the cell lines without a BBB monolayer (Figure 4C), were significantly less effective in the presence of BBB monolayer (Figure 5B), although apo-Lipodox increased the release of LDH in all the cell lines and induced the activation of casp”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Simvastatin enhances number of LDL receptors exposed and induces chemosensitization in different human tumour cells with constitutive expression of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and different degrees of resistance to doxorubicin.

    “We show here that simvastatin enhanced the number of LDL receptors exposed and induced chemosensitization in different human tumour (glioblastoma, neuroblastoma, nonsmall cell lung cancer, breast cancer) cells with constitutive expression of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2 and different degrees of resistance to doxorubicin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    Simvastatin enhances apo-Lipodox uptake and reduces apical efflux of doxorubicin, increasing trans-cellular transport of the drug.

    “Simvastatin, which forced BBB cells to expose more LDL receptors and simultaneously decreased the activity of Pgp/ABCB1, indeed enhanced the apo-Lipodox uptake and reduced the apical efflux of doxorubicin, increasing the trans-cellular transport of the drug.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Empty liposomes affect NO synthesis in hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Empty liposomes affect cytotoxicity in hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Apo-Lipodox alone or combination of simvastatin plus free doxorubicin increases drug delivery and toxicity.

    “Apo-Lipodox alone or the combination of simvastatin plus free doxorubicin increased drug delivery and toxicity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Empty liposomes affect NF-kB activity in hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Pretreatment of tumour cells with simvastatin followed by apo-Lipodox shows the greatest cytotoxic efficacy not only in primary CNS tumours like glioblastoma, but also in epithelial tumours such as lung and breast cancers cells.

    “Pretreatment of the tumour cells with simvastatin followed by the apo-Lipodox showed the greatest cytotoxic efficacy not only in primary CNS tumours like glioblastoma, but also in epithelial tumours, such as lung and breast cancers cells, whose metastasis within the CNS are often unresponsive to therapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingnone given

    Empty liposomes affect the cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on the delivery and cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    Pegylation affects the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.

    “Effects of pegylation on the permeability of LDL receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin across the BBB.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingnone given

    Empty liposomes affect the delivery of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on the delivery and cytotoxicity of free doxorubicin in co-culture models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Empty liposomes affect permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.

    “Effects of empty liposomes on NF-kB activity, NO synthesis, cytotoxicity and permeability in hCMEC/D3 cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Both neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors.

    “Certain types of drug-containing nanoparticles adsorb apoB-100 and apo-E proteins from human low-density lipoprotein (LDLs; Kim et al., 2007), are recognized by the LDL receptor and achieve an efficient drug delivery into brain parenchyma (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007) because both neurons and glial cells express LDL receptors (Ambruosi et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ambruosi et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Empty liposomes may affect different intracellular pathways modulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 in epithelial cells.

    “Empty liposomes may affect different intracellular pathways modulating the activity of Pgp/ABCB1 in epithelial cells (Riganti et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Liposomal particles alter lipid composition of plasma membrane microdomains, interfere with ATP hydrolysis and substrate binding, and elicit lower extrusion of doxorubicin in Pgp-overexpressing cells.

    “Besides being taken up more by LDL receptor-driven endocytosis (Kopecka et al., 2011), liposomal particles alter the lipid composition of the plasma membrane microdomains (i.e.lipid rafts) where Pgp/ABCB1 is active, interfere with ATP hydrolysis and substrate binding, and elicit a lower extrusion of doxorubicin in Pgp-overexpressing cells (Riganti et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kopecka et al., 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Riganti et al., 2011 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    RhoA kinase reduces stability of eNOS mRNA and prevents Akt-dependent phosphorylation of eNOS.

    “It has been also shown that RhoA kinase reduces the stability of eNOS mRNA and prevents the Akt-dependent phosphorylation of eNOS (Rikitake and Liao, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rikitake and Liao, 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Presence of PEG does not interfere with the attachment of LDL receptor-targeted peptide or with liposome uptake, either by simple endocytosis or LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.

    “suggesting that the presence of PEG did not interfere with the attachment of LDL receptor-targeted peptide or with the liposome uptake, either by simple endocytosis or LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Activators of endogenous NO synthesis, such as lipopolysaccharide, TNF-a and endothelin-1, as well as the NO donor SNP, affect Pgp/ABCB1 in rat brain capillaries, producing a decrease in transporter expression and activity after 3 h followed by an increase at 6 h.

    “Activators of endogenous NO synthesis, such as lipopolysaccharide, TNF-a and endothelin-1, as well as the NO donor SNP, are known to affect Pgp/ABCB1 in rat brain capillaries, producing a decrease in the transporter expression and activity after a 3 h incubation (Bauer et al., 2007;Hartz et al., 2007) followed by an increase at 6 h (Bauer et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bauer et al., 2007 source
    • cites Hartz et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Apo-Lipodox is internalized efficiently via LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and is less extruded by Pgp/ABCB1 in solid tumour cells.

    “We have previously shown that anionic pegylated liposomes loaded with doxorubicin and conjugated with a synthetic peptide containing the LDL receptor-binding site from human apo-B100 (the so-called 'apo-Lipodox') was internalized efficiently via a LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and was less extruded by Pgp/ABCB1 in solid tumour cells (Kopecka et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kopecka et al., 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Chemical modifications and improvements of drug-loaded nanoparticles are under intensive investigations.

    “For this reason, chemical modifications and improvements of drugloaded nanoparticles are under intensive investigations (Michaelis et al., 2006;Nikanjam et al., 2007;Guo et al., 2011;Wohlfart et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Michaelis et al., 2006 source
    • cites Nikanjam et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Guo et al., 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The presented results are representative of multiple independent experiments with similar results.

    “The figure is representative of three experiments with superimposable results.”
    • Also stated in: § BJP · plain
      “The figures shown here are representative of three similar experiments performed in duplicate.”
    • Also stated in: § BJP · plain
      “The figures shown here are representative of 3 similar experiments, performed in triplicate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The 'Trojan horse' approach (statins followed by LDL receptor-targeting liposomal drug) might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different CNS diseases.

    “In a general perspective, our 'Trojan horse' approach, based on the administration of statins followed by a LDL receptortargeting liposomal drug, might have potential applications in the pharmacological therapy of different CNS diseases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Poor permeability across the BBB also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    GAPDH expression was used to check equal protein loading in Western blots.

    “The expression of GAPDH was used to check the equal protein loading.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
46 of 46
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Passage of drugs across the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours.

    “The passage of drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the efficacy of chemotherapy in brain tumours.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Doxorubicin is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro.

    “Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Doxorubicin is ineffective clinically at treating glioblastoma.

    “Doxorubicin, for instance, is a very effective anticancer drug against glioblastoma cells in vitro, but since it is a substrate of Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its delivery across the BBB is hampered and it is ineffective clinically at treating this tumour.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No data exist on the effects of statins on the metabolism and permeability of BBB cells.

    “To our knowledge, no data exist on the effects of statins on the metabolism and permeability of BBB cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hCMEC/D3 cell line is a suitable in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier.

    “The hCMEC/D3 cells, a human brain microvascular endothelial cell line, were cultured as previously described (Weksler et al., 2005).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Permeability measured across hCMEC/D3 cell monolayers reflects drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier in vivo.

    “The permeability to inulin, taken as a parameter of the integrity of the tight junctions (Monnaert et al., 2004), was measured on hCMEC/D3 cells seeded at 50 000•cm -2 and grown for 7 days up to confluence in 6-multiwell Transwell devices (0.4 mm diameter pores-size, Corning Life Sciences, Chorges, BJP ML Pinzón-Daza et al.France).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The co-culture of hCMEC/D3 cells with tumour cells in Transwell devices reflects drug delivery to brain tumours in vivo.

    “The hCMEC/D3 cells (50 000•cm -2 ) were grown for 7 days up to confluence in 6-multiwell Transwell devices (0.4 mm diameter pores-size), whereas in the lower chamber, 500 000 cells (U87-MG, SJKNP, A549 or MDA-MB-231 cells) were seeded at day 4.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Doxorubicin is transported by Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2.

    “As doxorubicin is transported by Pgp/ABCB1, MRP1/ ABCC1 and BCRP/ABCG2, its ability to cross the BBB cells is poor in vivo”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The abundance of ABC transporters on primary CNS tumours, cerebral metastasis of epithelial solid tumours and on BBB cells determines a poor response to chemotherapy.

    “The abundance of ABC transporters on primary CNS tumours, on cerebral metastasis of epithelial solid tumours and on BBB cells determines a poor response to chemotherapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The low drug delivery across BBB and the low drug accumulation within the tumour are among the main factors that decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy in primary and metastatic brain tumours.

    “The low drug delivery across BBB and the low drug accumulation within the tumour are among the main factors that decrease the efficacy of chemotherapy in primary and metastatic brain tumours.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Whether statins have effects on the transport functions of brain microvascular endothelium has not been investigated.

    “to our knowledge, whether they have effects on the transport functions of brain microvascular endothelium has not been investigated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A high blood flow usually ensures better delivery of anticancer drugs within tumour areas and better tumour oxygenation enhances the cytotoxicity of many anticancer drugs including doxorubicin.

    “A high blood flow usually ensures better delivery of anticancer drugs within tumour areas and better tumour oxygenation enhances the cytotoxicity of many anticancer drugs including doxorubicin.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Both statins and liposomal drugs have chemosensitizer properties in solid tumours.

    “both statins and liposomal drugs have chemosensitizer properties in solid tumours”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Liposomal drugs are delivered across the BBB more easily than free drugs.

    “liposomal drugs are delivered across the BBB more easily than free drugs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Poor permeability across the BBB also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.

    “The problem of poor permeability across the BBB is not limited to anticancer drugs, but also affects the delivery of agents used in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases.”
15 of 15

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting simvastatin dose for Figure S3D

    Minor

    The Results describe the Figure S3D permeability experiment as using 0.1 mmol•L -1 simvastatin for 48 h, but the Figure S3D caption specifies 5 mmol•L -1 for the same treatment.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pinzón‐Daza, M., Garzón, R., Couraud, P., Romero, I., Weksler, B., Ghigo, D., Bosia, A., & Riganti, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad del Rosario (CO)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Riganti, C
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-06
Volume
167
Issue
7
Pages
1431-1447
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1489719702
Cited by
84
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Compagnia di San Paolo (2008.1136)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (MFAG 11475)
  • Università degli Studi di Torino
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
statins, doxorubicin, blood-brain barrier, LDL receptor, liposomes, glioblastoma, P-glycoprotein, ABCG2, multidrug resistance, nitric oxide, Trojan horse, drug delivery, brain tumors, hCMEC/D3 cells, nanoparticle drug delivery
MeSH terms
Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Line, Doxorubicin, Humans, Liposomes, Lovastatin, Nitrites, Receptors, LDL, NF-kappa B, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Cell Line, Tumor, rho-Associated Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review