Cited by 119Head and Neck Cancer StudiesViral-associated cancers and disordersGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Authentication of nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor lines

Open access
Chan, Sylvia Yat‐Yee, Choy, Kwong‐Wai, Tsao, Sai‐Wah, Tao, Qian, Tang, Tao, Chung, Grace Tin‐Yun, Lo, Kwok‐Wai·2008·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in most part of the world but shows high incidence in South China and Southeast Asia. One of the unique features of this epithelial cancer is its consistent association with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection. Studies have shown that EBV plays a key role in the genesis and maintenance of the tumor phenotype in this disease.1 Clonal EBV genome and latent gene products are found in almost all cases of NPC expect for the keratinizing type of NPC from nonendemic areas. With the advance of molecular biology, knowledge of molecular alterations and EBV's function in NPC rapidly accumulated in the past 15 years.1, 2 However, most of these studies are based on the EBV-negative NPC cell lines established at 10–20 years ago. Until now, only a few NPC cell lines, such as C666-1, stably harboring the EBV genome were used as EBV-positive NPC model.3 In addition to the established NPC cell lines, several EBV-positive NPC transplants in nude mice (e.g. C15, C17, xeno-666, xeno-2117 and xeno-1915) were used for identifying the genetic alterations and delineating aberrant signal transduction pathways in NPC.4, 5 Because of the difficulties in manipulating target gene expression in these in vivo models, they are rarely used in functional studies. Recently, we have performed the array-based CGH analysis on a number of NPC cell lines, xenografts and primary tumors.6 We observed similar copy number aberrant patterns in some EBV-negative cell lines. Furthermore, these cell lines show distinct transcription profiles from the C666-1 cell line and NPC xenografts in microarray analysis (unpublished observations). It raised the concern for the identity of tumor lines used in NPC study. Thus, we investigated the authenticity of a number of NPC cell lines (C666-1, HK-1, CNE-1 and CNE-2), xenografts (xeno-666, xeno-2117, xeno-1915, C15 and C17) and immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NP69 and NP460), which are commonly included in our previous works.1 The DNA samples from these tumors were extracted and subjected to DNA fingerprinting analysis using the AmpF/STR Identifiler® PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). A total of 15 short tandem repeat (STR) loci (D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51, D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, D16S539, TH01, TPOX, CSF1P0, D2S1338, D19S433) were co-amplified in each sample and detected on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer according to the manufacturer's protocol. Amelogenin loci at the sex chromosomes was also examined. The data were analyzed and allele(s) of each locus were determined by GeneScan and GeneMapper™ ID Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). The STR profiles of NPC tumors and immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines are shown in Table I. Distinct STR profiles were found in HK-1, NP69, NP460 and all EBV-positive xenografts (xeno-666, xeno-2117, xeno-1915, C15 and C17). The STR profile of xeno-666 and its devised cell line C666-1 are almost identical.3 In C666-1 cells, multiple alleles of D8S1179 and D21S11 loci were observed. It may be due to the microsatellite instability feature of this cell line. Surprisingly, we found high similarity between the STR profiles of 2 EBV-negative cell lines, CNE-1 and CNE-2. Complete identical alleles were detected in 12 out of 15 loci. Compared to CNE-1, gain of an extra allele at TPOX and loss of 1 allele at FGA and THO1 was observed in CNE-2. The minor allelic variations may be due to genetic instability or chromosomal aberrant during long-term in vivo culture. The finding implies that these 2 widely used EBV-negative cell lines are genetically identical and should be derived from a single cell line. Because many studies have shown that a number of cell lines were contaminated with HeLa,7 we then investigated whether CNE-1 and CNE-2 are contaminated with this common cell line. HeLa is a cell line devised from the glandular cancer of cervix, which contains the HPV-18 genome. Nevertheless, HPVs have not been detected in primary NPC tumors. We have examined the presence of E6/E7 sequence of HPV-18 in all NPC samples by PCR analysis. Interestingly, HPV-18 sequences were only found in the CNE-1 and CNE-2 cells (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we examined whether the STR profile of the HeLa is identical to that of the 2 EBV-negative NPC cell lines. The STR profile of HeLa determined was completely matched with that listed in the ATCC datasheet. While we compared the STR profiles among HeLa, CNE-1 and CNE-2, we noted that the CNE-1 and CNE-2 profiles contain at least 1 identical allele from HeLa for the 15 loci examined. Interestingly, in several loci (e.g. vWA, D8S1179, D7S820, CSF190, D19S433), only 1 of 2 alleles from HeLa was detected in the CNE-1 and CNE-2 genomes. The presence of partial genome of HeLa in CNE-1 and CNE-2 excludes the possibility that the cell lines are simply cross-contaminants of HeLa cells. Our previous cytogenetic study also did not found 2 heterogenous popula

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.23374

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNE-2, derived from Chinese patients, was reported bearing HPV sequences and suspected to be contaminated by fusion of HeLa with another nasopharyngeal cell line.

    “CNE-2, derived from the Chinese patients, was reported bearing HPV sequences and suspected to be contaminated by fusion of HeLa with another nasopharyngeal cell line [23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Lo KW, To KF, Huang DP. Focus on nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2004;5:423-8.
  2. Tao Q, Chan AT. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic developments. Expert Rev Mol Med 2007;9:1-24.
  3. Cheung ST, Huang DP, Hui AB, Lo KW, Ko CW, Tsang YS, Wong N, Whitney BM, Lee JC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line (C666- 1) consistently harbouring Epstein-Barr virus. Int J Cancer 1999;83: 121-6.
  4. Huang DP, Ho JH, Chan WK, Lau WH, Lui M. Cytogenetics of undif- ferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma xenografts from southern Chi- nese. Int J Cancer 1989;43:936-9.
  5. Busson P, Ganem G, Flores P, Mugneret F, Clausse B, Braham K, Wakasugi H, Lipinski M, Trusz T. Establishment and characterization of three transplantable EBV-containing nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1988;42:599-606.
  6. Hui ABY, Or YY, Takano H, Tsang RK, To KF, Guan XY, Sham JST, Hung KW, Lam CN, van Hasselt CA, Kuo WL, Gray JW, et al. Array-based CGH analysis identified cyclin D1 as a target oncogene at 11q13.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res 2005;65:8125- 133.
  7. Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, Reid YA, Dirks WG, Packer P, Toji LH, Ohno T, Tanabe H, Arlett CF, Kelland LR, Harrison M, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98: 8012-17.
  8. Wong N, Hui AB, Fan B, Lo KW, Pang E, Leung SF, Huang DP, Johnson PJ. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines and xenografts by comparative genomic hybrid- ization and spectral karyotyping. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003; 140:124-32.
  9. Gu SY, Tang WP, Zeng Y, Zhao ML, Zhao EWP, Deng WH, Li K. An epithelial cell line established from poorly differentiated nasopha- ryngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 1983;2:70-2.
  10. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Chungshan Medical Col- lege. Establishment of an epithelial cell line and fusiform cell line from a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Sci Sin 1978;21:113- 18.
  11. Sun Y, Hegamyer G, Cheng YJ, Hildesheim A, Chen IH, Cao Y, Yao KT, Colburn NH. An infrequent point mutation of the p53 gene in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89: 6516-20.
  12. Lo KW, Huang DP, Lau KM. p16 gene alterations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res 1995;55:2039-43.
  13. Boonstra JJ, van der Velden AW, Beerens EC, van Marion R, Morita- Fujimura Y, Matsui Y, Nishihira T, Tselepis C, Hainaut P, Lowe AW, Beveloo BH, van Bekken H, et al. Mistaken identity of widely used esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line TE-7. Cancer Res 2007;67: 7996-8001.
  14. Chatterjee R. Cell biology: cases of mistaken identity. Science 2007; 315:928-31.

Cited by

Authors
Chan, S. Y., Choy, K., Tsao, S., Tao, Q., Tang, T., Chung, G. T., & Lo, K.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lo, Kwok‐Wai
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-25
Volume
122
Issue
9
Pages
2169-2171
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2050684646
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
nasopharyngeal carcinoma, DNA fingerprinting, Epstein-Barr virus, xenografts, copy number alterations, cell line contamination
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Herpesvirus 4, Human, HeLa Cells, Humans, Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, Transplantation, Heterologous, Microsatellite Repeats, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Biomedical Research, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review