Cited by 149Identification and Quantification in FoodViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Genetic profiling reveals an alarming rate of cross‐contamination among human cell lines used in China

Ye, Fang, Chen, Chuguang, Qin, Jian, Liu, Jie, Zheng, Congyi·2015·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Cell lines are widely used as in vitro model systems in biologic and medical research. However, much of the research has been invalidated by the unwitting use of false cell lines. A significant proportion of the research involving human cell lines was initiated in China. Paradoxically, the cell lines used in China have never been authenticated. Here, we present a comprehensive survey of cross‐contamination in 380 samples from 113 independent sources in China using short tandem repeat profiling methods. High levels of cross‐contamination were uncovered (95 of 380, 25%). Notable false cell lines ( e.g. , KB and WISH) are still actively used under their false identity and tissue attributions. Most strikingly, 85.51% of lines established in China were misidentified (59 of 69) and accounted for over half of the misidentifications (59 of 95, 62.11%). Further, 93.22% of the contaminants in cell lines established in laboratories of China were HeLa cells or a possible hybrid of HeLa with an unknown cell line. Results from these misidentified lines have been published in thousands of potentially erroneous articles and may have distorted the findings visible to the scientific community. False lines have been used in drug screening, potentially leading to unusable or even harmful therapeutic strategies. We also noted the causes of contamination and provided suggestions for remediation.—Ye, F., Chen, C, Qin, J., Liu, J., Zheng, C. Genetic profiling reveals an alarming rate of cross‐contamination among human cell lines used in China. FASEB J. 29, 4268‐4272 (2015). www.fasebj.org

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.14-266718

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our lab found about 25% cross-contamination or misidentification among 380 cell lines from 2009 to 2013 using 16/20-loci STR.

    “Our lab started using STR for cell line authentication from 2009 with 16/20-loci STR and found about 25% cross-contamination or misidentification among 380 cell lines from 2009 to 2013 [6].”
  • Fang Ye and colleagues investigated 380 human cell lines and found about 25% were cross-contaminated or misidentified.

    “An alarming rate of cross-contamination among human cell lines used in China was reported by Fang Ye and colleagues [6] who investigated 380 human cell lines in which about 25% was cross-contaminated or misidentified.”
  • Misidentification continues to haunt biomedical research, with new announcements of large-scale cross-contaminations and widespread use of misidentified cell lines appearing even recently.

    “In spite of several alarm calls and initiatives to remedy the problem, misidentification continues to haunt biomedical research, with new announcements of large-scale cross-contaminations and widespread use of misidentified cell lines appearing even recently [11–13].”
  • An analysis of the literature for the past five years showed a dramatic rise of China's share in the contaminated literature.

    “Nevertheless, an analysis of the literature for the past five years showed a dramatic rise of China’s share in the contaminated literature, confirming recent worries expressed in the literature [13].”
  • 85% of all 'new' cell lines developed in China actually turned out to be HeLa cells.

    “demonstrate that of all ‘new’ cell lines developed in China 85% actually turned out to be HeLa cells [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, F., Chen, C., Qin, J., Liu, J., & Zheng, C.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Beijing Microread Genetics Company, Limited Beijing China
Corresponding author
Zheng, Congyi
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
4268-4272
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2157825735
Cited by
144
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
human cell lines, cross-contamination, cell line authentication, short tandem repeat profiling, HeLa cells, KB cells
MeSH terms
China, DNA, Neoplasm, HeLa Cells, Humans, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Microsatellite Repeats, Biomedical Research, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review