The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies
Open accessAbstract
There is uncertainty and limited recognition of the relationship between socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer. We aimed to quantitatively assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral cancer incidence risk. A systematic review of case‐control studies obtained published and unpublished estimates of the SES risk related to oral cancer. Studies were included which reported odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CIs of oral cancer with respect to SES, or if the estimates could be calculated or obtained. Meta‐analyses were performed on subgroups: SES measure, age, sex, global region, development level, time‐period and lifestyle factor adjustments; while sensitivity analyses were conducted based on study methodological issues. Forty‐one studies provided 15,344 cases and 33,852 controls which met our inclusion criteria. Compared with individuals who were in high SES strata, the pooled ORs for the risk of developing oral cancer were 1.85 (95%CI 1.60, 2.15; n = 37 studies) for those with low educational attainment; 1.84 (1.47, 2.31; n = 14) for those with low occupational social class; and 2.41 (1.59, 3.65; n = 5) for those with low income. Subgroup analyses showed that low SES was significantly associated with increased oral cancer risk in high and lower income‐countries, across the world, and remained when adjusting for potential behavioural confounders. Inequalities persist but are perhaps reducing over recent decades. Oral cancer risk associated with low SES is significant and comparable to lifestyle risk factors. Our results provide evidence to steer health policy which focus on lifestyles factors toward an integrated approach incorporating measures designed to tackle the root causes of disadvantage. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Statistical Methods in Cancer Research
Breslow, N. E. (1980) · Cited by 7,332
Social determinants of health inequalities
Marmot, M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71146-6 · Cited by 5,086
Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 4,988
Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., & Pisani, P. (2001) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.1440 · Cited by 3,721
Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study
Marmot, M. G., Stansfeld, S., Patel, C., North, F., Head, J., White, I., Brunner, E., Feeney, A., Marmot, M. G., & Smith, G. D. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k · Cited by 3,608
Cited by
Oral diseases: a global public health challenge
Peres, M. A., Macpherson, L. M. D., Weyant, R. J., Daly, B., Venturelli, R., Mathur, M. R., Listl, S., Celeste, R. K., Guarnizo-Herreño, C. C., Kearns, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31146-8 · Cited by 4,054
Self-citationCauses of oral cancer–an appraisal of controversies
Warnakulasuriya, S. (2009) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.1009 · Cited by 347
The relationship between income and oral health: a critical review
Singh, A., Peres, M. A., & Watt, R. G. (2019) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034519849557 · Cited by 243
Conway, D. I., Brenner, D. R., McMahon, A. D., Macpherson, L. M. D., Agudo, A., Ahrens, W., Bosetti, C., Brenner, H., Castellsague, X., Chen, C., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29063 · Cited by 167
“Head and neck cancer risk has been strongly associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES) especially among men.(14) The relative contributions of alcohol and tobacco consumption to the association of SES and head and neck cancer has varied considerably, with estimates of the unexplained or “direct” effect of low SE…”
BackgroundSelf-citationWinn, D., Lee, Y., Hashibe, M., Boffetta, P., & the INHANCE consortium (2015) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.12342 · Cited by 102
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Conway, D. I., Petticrew, M., Marlborough, H., Berthiller, J., Hashibe, M., & Macpherson, L. M. D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-09
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2811-2819
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1966854325
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.23430
- The paper
- Conway, D. I., Petticrew, M., Marlborough, H., Berthiller, J., Hashibe, M., & Macpherson, L. M. D. (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.