Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies

Open access
Conway, David I., Petticrew, Mark, Marlborough, Helen, Berthiller, Julien, Hashibe, Mia, Macpherson, Lorna M.D.·2008·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

There is uncertainty and limited recognition of the relationship between socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer. We aimed to quantitatively assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral cancer incidence risk. A systematic review of case‐control studies obtained published and unpublished estimates of the SES risk related to oral cancer. Studies were included which reported odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CIs of oral cancer with respect to SES, or if the estimates could be calculated or obtained. Meta‐analyses were performed on subgroups: SES measure, age, sex, global region, development level, time‐period and lifestyle factor adjustments; while sensitivity analyses were conducted based on study methodological issues. Forty‐one studies provided 15,344 cases and 33,852 controls which met our inclusion criteria. Compared with individuals who were in high SES strata, the pooled ORs for the risk of developing oral cancer were 1.85 (95%CI 1.60, 2.15; n = 37 studies) for those with low educational attainment; 1.84 (1.47, 2.31; n = 14) for those with low occupational social class; and 2.41 (1.59, 3.65; n = 5) for those with low income. Subgroup analyses showed that low SES was significantly associated with increased oral cancer risk in high and lower income‐countries, across the world, and remained when adjusting for potential behavioural confounders. Inequalities persist but are perhaps reducing over recent decades. Oral cancer risk associated with low SES is significant and comparable to lifestyle risk factors. Our results provide evidence to steer health policy which focus on lifestyles factors toward an integrated approach incorporating measures designed to tackle the root causes of disadvantage. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.23430

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Conway, D. I., Petticrew, M., Marlborough, H., Berthiller, J., Hashibe, M., & Macpherson, L. M. D.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-09
Volume
122
Issue
12
Pages
2811-2819
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1966854325
Cited by
440
References
79
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.23430
The paper
Conway, D. I., Petticrew, M., Marlborough, H., Berthiller, J., Hashibe, M., & Macpherson, L. M. D. (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of case‐control studies. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23430

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.