Cited by 54Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGenital Health and DiseaseWomen's cancer prevention and management

The predicted impact of vaccination on human papillomavirus infections in Australia

Open access
Smith, Megan A., Canfell, Karen, Brotherton, Julia M.L., Lew, Jie‐Bin, Barnabas, Ruanne V.·2008·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Vaccines based on human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 virus-like particles have the potential to prevent approximately 70% of cervical cancers. In Australia, public vaccination against HPV commenced in April 2007, and includes routine vaccination of females aged 12-13 years, and a 2-year school and GP-based catch-up in females aged 12-26 years. The objectives of this study were to estimate initial vaccination coverage rates, to describe current patterns of sexual behavior in young females, and to predict the impact of vaccination on HPV16 infections. We reviewed early coverage data, estimating that coverage in 2007/2008 will reach 86% (feasible range 67-90%) for 12- to 13-year-old girls, with lower rates attained in older females. A review of survey data found that the median age of first intercourse in Australian females is 16 years, with approximately 90% of women sexually active at 22 years. Using these data, we performed an analysis of HPV transmission to predict the impact of vaccination on HPV infection rates. The public program is predicted to result in a reduction in the age-standardized incidence of HPV16 infections of 56% by 2010 (feasible range 48-61%), and 92% by 2050 (feasible range 76-95%). Elective vaccination of older women and vaccination of males may provide some incremental gains, but the benefits to women of vaccinating males will be less if coverage of females remains high. In conclusion, the current vaccination program is expected to result in a substan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.23633

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, M. A., Canfell, K., Brotherton, J. M. L., Lew, J., & Barnabas, R. V.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Council NSW (AU)
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Canfell, Karen
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-13
Volume
123
Issue
8
Pages
1854-1863
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2000980850
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Australian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, HPV16, HPV 18, cervical cancer prevention, vaccination coverage, HPV transmission, sexual behavior, age at first sexual intercourse, incidence reduction, catch-up vaccination, male vaccination, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Vaccination, Models, Statistical, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review