Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved overall survival after contralateral risk‐reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: A prospective analysis

Open access
Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, Bernadette A.M., Rookus, Matti A., Aalfs, Cora M., Ausems, Margreet G.E.M., Collée, Johanna M., Jansen, Liesbeth, Kets, C. Marleen, Keymeulen, Kristien B.M.I., Koppert, Linetta B., Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne E.J., Mooij, Thea M., Tollenaar, Rob A.E.M., Vasen, Hans F.A., HEBON, Hooning, Maartje J., Seynaeve, Caroline·2015·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Data on survival of BRCA1/2‐associated primary breast cancer (PBC) patients who opt for subsequent contralateral risk‐reducing mastectomy (CRRM) are scarce and inconsistent. We examined the efficacy of CRRM on overall survival in mutation carriers with a history of PBC. From a Dutch multicentre cohort, we selected 583 BRCA‐associated PBC patients, being diagnosed between 1980 and 2011. Over time, 242 patients (42%) underwent CRRM and 341 patients (58%) remained under surveillance. Survival analyses were performed using Cox models, with CRRM as a time‐dependent covariate. The median follow‐up after PBC diagnosis was 11.4 years. In the CRRM group, four patients developed contralateral breast cancer (2%), against 64 patients (19%) in the surveillance group (p < 0.001). The mortality was lower in the CRRM group than in the surveillance group (9.6 and 21.6 per 1000 person‐years of observation, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.29–0.82). Survival benefit was especially seen in young PBC patients (<40 years), in patients having a PBC with differentiation grade 1/2 and/or no triple‐negative phenotype, and in patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. We conclude that CRRM is associated with improved overall survival in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of PBC. Further research is warranted to develop a model based on age at diagnosis and tumour and treatment characteristics that can predict survival benefit for specific subgroups of patients, aiming at further personalized counselling and improved decision making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.29032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, B. A. M., Rookus, M. A., Aalfs, C. M., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Collée, J. M., Jansen, L., Kets, C. M., Keymeulen, K. B. M. I., Koppert, L. B., Meijers‐Heijboer, H. E. J., Mooij, T. M., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Vasen, H. F. A., HEBON, Hooning, M. J., & Seynaeve, C.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-08
Volume
136
Issue
3
Pages
668-677
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2157086121
Cited by
216
References
5
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved overall survival after contralateral risk‐reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: A prospective analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.29032
The paper
Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, B. A. M., Rookus, M. A., Aalfs, C. M., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Collée, J. M., Jansen, L., Kets, C. M., Keymeulen, K. B. M. I., Koppert, L. B., Meijers‐Heijboer, H. E. J., Mooij, T. M., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Vasen, H. F. A., HEBON, Hooning, M. J., & Seynaeve, C. (2015). Improved overall survival after contralateral risk‐reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: A prospective analysis. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.