Cited by 178BRCA gene mutations in cancerMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Contralateral mastectomy improves survival in women with BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer

Evans, D. Gareth R., Ingham, Sarah L., Baildam, Andrew, Ross, Gary L., Lalloo, Fiona, Buchan, Iain, Howell, Anthony·2013·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast cancer are at high risk of contralateral disease. Such women often elect to have contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) to reduce the likelihood of recurrence. This study considers whether CRRM improves overall survival. 105 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with unilateral breast cancer who underwent CRRM were compared to controls (593 mutation carriers and 105 specifically matched) not undergoing CRRM and diagnosed between 1985 and 2010. Survival was assessed by proportional hazards models, and extended to a matched analysis using stratification by risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO), gene, grade and stage. Median time to CRRM was 1.1 years after the primary diagnosis (range 0.0-13.3). Median follow-up was 9.7 years in the CRRM group and 8.6 in the non-CRRM group. The 10-year overall survival was 89 % in women electing for CRRM (n = 105) compared to 71 % in the non-CRRM group (n = 593); p < 0.001. The survival advantage remained after matching for oophorectomy, gene, grade and stage: HR 0.37 (0.17-0.80, p = 0.008)-CRRM appeared to act independently of RRBSO. CRRM appears to confer a survival advantage. If this finding is confirmed in a larger series it should form part of the counselling procedure at diagnosis of the primary tumour. The indication for CRRM in women who have had RRBSO also requires further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-013-2583-1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D. G. R., Ingham, S. L., Baildam, A., Ross, G. L., Lalloo, F., Buchan, I., & Howell, A.
Affiliations
  • Wythenshawe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The Christie Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, D. Gareth R.
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
135-142
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2103700689
Cited by
178
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0707-10031, NF-SI-0509-10214)
  • Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K006665/1, MC_PC_13042)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
BRCA1 mutation carriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers, hereditary breast cancer, overall survival, contralateral breast cancer, tumor recurrence prevention, genetic counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Mutation, Ovariectomy, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review