Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pigmentary and cutaneous risk factors for non‐melanocytic skin cancer—A case‐control study

Kricker, Anne, Armstrong, Bruce K., English, Dallas R., Heenan, Peter J.·1991·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The roles of ethnic origin, pigmentray traits, sun sensitivity and other cutaneous characteristics as risk factors for basal‐cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous‐cell carcinoma (SCC) were examnied in a case‐control study of prevalent and incident cases of histopathologically confirmed skin cancers. Two hundred and twenty six confirmed cases of BCC, 45 of SCC and 1,015 controls with no lesions were identified in a population‐based survey of skin cancer in 1987 in Geralditon, Western Australia. The risk of both cancers was higher in nativeborn Australians than in migrants. The risk of BCC decreased with increasing age at arrival in Australia. Southern European ancestry was strongly protective against BCC (for any southern European grandparents) and SCC (no case of SCC had any granparetns of southern European origin). Inability to tan was the strongest pigmentary risk factor for both BCC and SCC. Among Factors that incorporated a measure of sun exposure as well as sun sensitivity, freckling on the arm in childhood was important for both cancers, the number of moles on the back was important for BCC, and forearm skin colour and having a permanent colour difference between the neck and adjacent protected areas were important for SCC. Among measures of sun damage to the skin, solar elastosis of the neck was a strong risk factor for both BCC and SCC, loss of fine texture of the sink of the back of the hands (as measured by cutaneous microtopography) was important for BCC and telangiectasia of the face for SCC. When all important variables for each cancer were examined together in a single model with age, sex, migrant status or age at arrival in Australia, and ethnicity, inability to tan, solar elastosis of the neck, and the number of moles on the back were independently significant risk factors for BCC and solar elatosis of the neck and having a permanent colour difference between the neck and adjacent protected areas were independently sifnificant risk factors for SCC. The effects of age at arrival or migrant status and ethnic origin remeained important on the models incorporating these factors. A history of ever having acne and a history of warts were protective for BCC and a history of acne was protective for SCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910480504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Kricker, A., Armstrong, B. K., English, D. R., & Heenan, P. J.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-07-09
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
650-662
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1967673964
Cited by
243
References
0
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pigmentary and cutaneous risk factors for non‐melanocytic skin cancer—A case‐control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910480504
The paper
Kricker, A., Armstrong, B. K., English, D. R., & Heenan, P. J. (1991). Pigmentary and cutaneous risk factors for non‐melanocytic skin cancer—A case‐control study. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910480504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.