Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds: An eortc multicenter case‐control study in Belgium, France and Germany

Autier, Philippe, Doré, Jean‐Francois, Lejeune, Ferdy, Koelmel, Klaus F., Geffeler, Olaf, Hille, Petra, Cesarini, Jean‐Pierre, Lienard, Daniéle, Liabeuf, André, Joarlette, Marie, Chemaly, Philippe, Hakim, Karole, Koeln, Astrid, Kleeberg, Ulrich R., for the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group·1994·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The study objective was to assess whether exposure to sunlamps and sunbeds represents a risk factor for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). A 1‐to‐1 unmatched case‐control study was conducted among subjects 20 years old or more with naturally non‐pigmented skin in Germany, France and Belgium. A total of 420 consecutive patients with CMM diagnosed from I January 1991 onward were derived from hospital registers; 447 controls with no history of skin cancer were chosen at random in the same municipality as the cases. Exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds starting before 1960 is associated with a crude estimated risk of CMM of 2.71 (95% CI: 1.06‐7.78) for at least 10 hr of accumulated exposure. This risk is of 2.12 (95% CI: 0.84‐5.37) after adjustment for age, sex, hair colour and average number of holiday weeks each year in sunny resorts. Subjects who experienced skin‐burn due to sunlamps or sunbeds, and who had accumulated at least 10 hr of exposure, displayed a crude estimated CMM risk of 4.47 (95% CI: 1.45‐13.7), which rose to 8.97 (95% CI: 2.10‐38.6) for those who exposed their skin for tanning purposes. The risk associated with skin‐bum is only marginally modified after multiple adjustments for host characteristics and recreational exposure to sunlight. Apparently, sunlamps and sunbeds share the increased risk of CMM, which seems to concentrate in subjects exhibiting hazardous behaviour towards ultraviolet radiation sources. However, although it is reasonable to believe that high doses of pure ultraviolet A radiation can be dangerous, this is not firmly established by this study. Most exposures to ultraviolet A tanning devices began after 1980; therefore, epidemiologic studies have difficulty in revealing any increase in risk of CMM starting after 1980 because of the latent period between exposure and occurrence of melanoma. Public health authorities should have a cautious approach towards the rapidly developing fashion of tanning under sunlamps or sunbeds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.2910580610

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Autier, P., Doré, J., Lejeune, F., Koelmel, K. F., Geffeler, O., Hille, P., Cesarini, J., Lienard, D., Liabeuf, A., Joarlette, M., Chemaly, P., Hakim, K., Koeln, A., Kleeberg, U. R., & for the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-09-15
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
809-813
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2128985863
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds: An eortc multicenter case‐control study in Belgium, France and Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910580610
The paper
Autier, P., Doré, J., Lejeune, F., Koelmel, K. F., Geffeler, O., Hille, P., Cesarini, J., Lienard, D., Liabeuf, A., Joarlette, M., Chemaly, P., Hakim, K., Koeln, A., Kleeberg, U. R., & for the EORTC Melanoma Cooperative Group. (1994). Cutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps or sunbeds: An eortc multicenter case‐control study in Belgium, France and Germany. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910580610

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.