The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of food groups and food diversity on breast cancer risk in Italy
Abstract
Although debate on breast cancer and diet has been concentrated on nutrients, assessment of the role of specific foods and food groups and variety of food intake retains a considerable importance. To further elucidate the role of dietary habits, 2,569 women with incident breast cancer (median age 55 years) and 2,588 control women (median age 56 years), hospitalised with acute non‐neoplastic diseases, were interviewed between 1991 and 1994 in 6 different Italian areas. The validated food frequency questionnaire included 79 food items and recipes, which were grouped into 18 food groups (5 for “diversity” analyses purpose). After allowance for non‐dietary confounding factors and total energy intake, significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk with increasing intake emerged for the following food groups: bread and cereal dishes, pork and processed meats, and sugar and candies. Conversely, high intake of milk, poultry, fish, raw vegetables, potatoes and coffee and tea seemed to exert a protection against the development of breast cancer. Intake of soups, eggs, other meats, cheese, cooked vegetables, citrus fruits, other fruits and cake and desserts were not significantly related to breast cancer risk. The variety of vegetable types consumed weekly seemed to have a beneficial effect beyond the advantage of high vegetable intake per se. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bingham, S. A., Gill, C., Welch, A., Day, K., Cassidy, A., Khaw, K. T., Sneyd, M. J., Key, T. J. A., Roe, L., & Day, N. E. (1994) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19940064 · Cited by 749
A comparison of prospective and retrospective assessments of diet in the study of breast cancer
Giovannucci, E., stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Manson, J. E., Rosner, B. A., Longnecker, M., Speizer, F. E., & Willett, W. C. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116703 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: a review of potential mechanisms
Larsson, S. C., Kumlin, M., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., & Wolk, A. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.6.935 · Cited by 950
Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Cohort Studies
Smith-Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Yaun, S.-S., Adami, H.-O., Beeson, W. L., van den Brandt, P. A., Folsom, A. R., Fraser, G. E., Freudenheim, J. L., Goldbohm, R. A., et al. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.6.769 · Cited by 462
Hatløy, A., Hallund, J., Diarra, M. M., & Oshaug, A. (2000) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980000000628 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Franceschi, S., Favero, A., La Vecchia, C., Negri, E., Dal Maso, L., Salvini, S., Decarli, A., & Giacosa, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 785-789
- ISSN
- 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0215
- OpenAlex
- W1992126654
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of food groups and food diversity on breast cancer risk in Italy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.2910630606
- The paper
- Franceschi, S., Favero, A., La Vecchia, C., Negri, E., Dal Maso, L., Salvini, S., Decarli, A., & Giacosa, A. (1995). Influence of food groups and food diversity on breast cancer risk in Italy. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910630606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.