Cited by 749Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v . 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records

Open access
Bingham, S. A., Gill, C., Welch, A., Day, K., Cassidy, A., Khaw, K. T., Sneyd, M. J., Key, T. J. A. +2 more·1994·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Women ( n 160) aged 50 to 65 years were asked to weigh their food for 4 d on four occasions over the period of 1 year, using the PETRA (Portable Electronic Tape Recorded Automatic) scales. Throughout the year, they were asked to complete seven other dietary assessment methods: a simple 24 h recall, a structured 24 h recall with portion size assessments using photographs, two food-frequency questionnaires, a 7 d estimated record or open-ended food diary, a structured food-frequency (menu) record, and a structured food-frequency (menu) record with portion sizes assessed using photographs. Comparisons between the average of the 16 d weighed records and the first presentation of each method indicated that food-frequency questionnaires were not appreciably better at placing individuals in the distribution of habitual diet than 24 h recalls, due partly to inaccuracies in the estimation of frequency of food consumption. With a 7 d estimated record or open-ended food diary, however, individual values of nutrients were most closely associated with those obtained from 16 d weighed records, and there were no significant differences in average food or nutrient intakes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19940064

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bingham, S. A., Welch, A., Cassidy, A., Runswick, S., Gill,.c. & Khaw, K. T. (1991). The use of 24 h urine nitrogen to detect bias in the reported habitual food intake of individuals assessed from weighed dietary records. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 50, 32A.
  2. Braddon, F. E. M., Wadsworth, M. E. J., Davies, J. M. C. & Cripps, H. A. (1988). Social and regional differences in food and alcohol consumption in Britain. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 42, 341-349.
  3. Sempos, C. T. (1992). Some limitations of semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires. American Journal of Epidemiology 135, 1127-1 133.
  4. W. C. Willett, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press. 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19940064 Published online by Cambridge University Press · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bingham, S. A., Gill, C., Welch, A., Day, K., Cassidy, A., Khaw, K. T., Sneyd, M. J., Key, T. J. A., Roe, L., & Day, N. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
1994-10
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
619-643
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2107471613
Cited by
749
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 29
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
dietary assessment, weighed food records, 24-hour dietary recall, food frequency questionnaire, food diary, portion size estimation, food consumption frequency, nutrient intake
MeSH terms
Dietetics, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review