Cited by 105Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Home‐based HPV self‐sampling improves participation by never‐screened and under‐screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia

Open access
Sultana, Farhana, English, Dallas R., Simpson, Julie A., Drennan, Kelly T., Mullins, Robyn, Brotherton, Julia M.L., Wrede, C. David, Heley, Stella +2 more·2016·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether HPV self‐sampling increases participation in cervical screening by never‐ and under‐screened (not screened in past 5 years) women when compared with a reminder letter for a Pap test. Never‐ or under‐screened Victorian women aged 30–69 years, not pregnant and with no prior hysterectomy were eligible. Within each stratum (never‐screened and under‐screened), we randomly allocated 7,140 women to self‐sampling and 1,020 to Pap test reminders. The self‐sampling kit comprised a nylon tipped flocked swab enclosed in a dry plastic tube. The primary outcome was participation, as indicated by returning a swab or undergoing a Pap test; the secondary outcome, for women in the self‐sampling arm with a positive HPV test, was undergoing appropriate clinical investigation. The Roche Cobas® 4800 test was used to measure presence of HPV DNA. Participation was higher for the self‐sampling arm: 20.3 versus 6.0% for never‐screened women (absolute difference 14.4%, 95% CI: 12.6–16.1%, p < 0.001) and 11.5 versus 6.4% for under‐screened women (difference 5.1%, 95% CI: 3.4–6.8%, p < 0.001). Of the 1,649 women who returned a swab, 45 (2.7%) were positive for HPV16/18 and 95 (5.8%) were positive for other high‐risk HPV types. Within 6 months, 28 (62.2%) women positive for HPV16/18 had colposcopy as recommended and nine (20%) had cytology only. Of women positive for other high‐risk HPV types, 78 (82.1%) had a Pap test as recommended. HPV self‐sampling improves participation in cervical screening for never‐ and under‐screened women and most women with HPV detected have appropriate clinical investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.30031

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bos AB, Rebolj M, Habbema JD, van Ballegooijen M. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2372-5.
  2. Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, Wardle J. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey. J Med Screen 2009;16:199-204.
  3. MSAC) MSAC. National Cervical Screening Program Renewal: Evidence Review. Canberra:Department of Health and Ageging; 2013
  4. Schmeink CE, Bekkers RL, Massuger LF, Melchers WJ. The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening. Rev Med Virol 2011;21:139-53.
  5. Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Arbyn M, Ogilvie G, Minozzi S, Banzi R, van Kemenade FJ, Heideman DA, Meijer CJ. High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: A review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2013;132:2223-36.
  6. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Suonio E, Dillner L, Minozzi S, Bellisario C, Banzi R, Zhao FH, Hillemanns P, Anttila A. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self- collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:172-83.
  7. Dillner J, Rebolj M, Birembaut P, Petry KU, Szarewski A, Munk C, de Sanjose S, Naucler P, Lloveras B, Kjaer S, Cuzick J, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1754.
  8. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Ghiringhello B, Girlando S, Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L, Naldoni C, Pierotti P, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:249-57.
  9. Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Boeke AJ, Bulk S, Voorhorst FJ, Verheijen RH, van Groningen K, Boon ME, Ruitinga W, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet 2007;370:1764-72.
  10. Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, Szarewski A, Birembaut P, Kulasingam S, Sasieni P, Iftner T. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1095-101.
  11. Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, Radberg T, Strander B, Johansson B, Forslund O, Hansson BG, Rylander E, et al. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1589-97.
  12. Petignat P, Faltin DL, Bruchim I, Tramer MR, Franco EL, Coutlee F. Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:530-5.
  13. Verdoodt F, Jentschke M, Hillemanns P, Racey CS, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M. Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self- sampling kits: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2015.
  14. Szarewski A, Cadman L, Mesher D, Austin J, Ashdown-Barr L, Edwards R, Lyons D, Walker J, Christison J, Frater A, Waller J. HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening -a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2011;104:915-20.
  15. Virtanen A, Anttila A, Luostarinen T, Nieminen P. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland. Int J Cancer 2011;128:2681-7.
  16. Virtanen A, Nieminen P, Luostarinen T, Anttila A. Self-sample HPV tests as an intervention for nonattendees of cervical cancer screening in Finland: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1960-9.
  17. Wikstrom I, Lindell M, Sanner K, Wilander E. Self-sampling and HPV testing or ordinary Pap- smear in women not regularly attending screening: a randomised study. Br J Cancer 2011;105:337-9.
  18. Sancho-Garnier H, Tamalet C, Halfon P, Leandri FX, Retraite LL, Djoufelkit K, Heid P, Davies P, Piana L. HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: A randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France. Int J Cancer 2013;133:2681-7.
  19. Gok M, Heideman DA, van Kemenade FJ, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, Spruyt JW, Voorhorst F, Belien JA, Babovic M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study. BMJ 2010;340:c1040.
  20. Broberg G, Gyrd-Hansen D, Miao Jonasson J, Ryd ML, Holtenman M, Milsom I, Strander B. Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer 2014;134:2223-30.
  21. Darlin L, Borgfeldt C, Forslund O, Henic E, Hortlund M, Dillner J, Kannisto P. Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening. J Clin Virol 2013;58:155-60.
  22. Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Brotherton JM, Drennan K, Mullins R, Heley S, Wrede CD, Saville M, Gertig DM. Rationale and design of the iPap trial: a randomized controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for improving participation in cervical screening by never- and under-screened women in Australia. BMC Cancer 2014;14:207.
  23. Sultana F, Gertig DM, Wrede CD, English DR, Simpson JA, Drennan KT, Brotherton JML, Phillips G, Heley S, Castle PE, Saville M. A pilot study to compare dry cervical sample collection with standard practice of wet cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing. Journal of Clinical Virology.
  24. Giorgi Rossi P, Fortunato C, Barbarino P, Boveri S, Caroli S, Del Mistro A, Ferro A, Giammaria C, Manfredi M, Moretto T, Pasquini A, Sideri M, et al. Self-sampling to increase participation in cervical cancer screening: an RCT comparing home mailing, distribution in pharmacies, and recall letter. Br J Cancer 2015;112:667-75.
  25. Bosgraaf RP, Verhoef VM, Massuger LF, Siebers AG, Bulten J, de Kuyper-de Ridder GM, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ, Heideman DA, IntHout J, van Kemenade FJ, Melchers WJ, et al. Comparative performance of novel self-sampling methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in 30,130 women not attending cervical screening. Int J Cancer 2015;136:646- 55.
  26. Gok M, Heideman DA, van Kemenade FJ, de Vries AL, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, Belien JA, Overbeek L, Babovic M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. Offering self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing to non-attendees of the cervical screening programme: Characteristics of the responders. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1799-808.
  27. Tamalet C, Le Retraite L, Leandri FX, Heid P, Sancho Garnier H, Piana L. Vaginal self-sampling is an adequate means of screening HR-HPV types in women not participating in regular cervical cancer screening. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:E44-50.
  28. Bais AG, van Kemenade FJ, Berkhof J, Verheijen RH, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst F, Babovic M, van Ballegooijen M, Helmerhorst TJ, Meijer CJ. Human papillomavirus testing on self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes: an effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer 2007;120:1505-10.
  29. Rozemeijer K, de Kok IM, Naber SK, van Kemenade FJ, Penning C, van Rosmalen J, van Ballegooijen M. Offering Self-Sampling to Non-Attendees of Organized Primary HPV Screening: When Do Harms Outweigh the Benefits? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:773-82.
  30. Sultana, F., English, D. R., Simpson, J. A., Drennan, K. T., Mullins, R., Brotherton, J. M. L., Wrede, C. D., Heley, S., Saville, M. & Gertig, D. M. (2016). Home-based HPV self-sampling improves participation by never-screened and under-screened women: Results from a large randomized trial (iPap) in Australia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 139 (2), pp.281-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30031. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/291042

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sultana, F., English, D. R., Simpson, J. A., Drennan, K. T., Mullins, R., Brotherton, J. M. L., Wrede, C. D., Heley, S., Saville, M., & Gertig, D. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer (AU)
  • Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Gertig, Dorota M.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
281-290
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2263339089
Cited by
105
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1045346)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
HPV self-sampling, cervical cancer screening, underscreened women, screening uptake, HPV testing, HPV 16/18, high-risk HPV, colposcopy, follow-up study, home-based screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Australia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Prevalence, Papillomavirus Infections, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review