The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coffee and pancreatic cancer risk among never-smokers in the UK prospective Million Women Study
Abstract
Reported associations between coffee consumption and an increased risk of pancreatic cancer could be due to residual confounding by smoking and/or biased recall of coffee consumption in retrospective studies. Studying associations prospectively in never smokers should minimize these problems, but thus far such studies have included relatively small numbers of cases. In our study, 309,797 never‐smoking women self‐reported typical daily coffee consumption at a mean age of 59.5 years (SD 5.0 years) and were followed up for a median of 13.7 years (IQR: 12.2–14.9) through record linkage to national health cancer and death registries. During this period, 962 incident cases of pancreatic cancers were registered. Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted relative risks [RRs] of incident pancreatic cancer with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] in relation to coffee consumption at baseline. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, including body mass index and alcohol consumption, RRs of pancreatic cancer in never‐smokers who reported usually consuming 1–2, 3–4, and ≥ 5 cups of coffee daily, compared to nondrinkers of coffee, were 1.02 (CI 0.83–1.26), 0.96 (0.76–1.22), and 0.87 (0.64–1.18), respectively (trend p = 0.2). A meta‐analysis of results from this cohort and 3 smaller prospective studies found little or no statistically significant association between coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk in never smokers (summary RR = 1.00, CI 0.86–1.17 for ≥2 vs. zero cups of coffee per day).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The risk ratios for pancreatic cancer in this group of women regularly decreased, reaching 1.02 (95% CI = 0.83–1.26), 0.96 (0.76–1.22), and 0.87 (0.64–1.18) for the daily consumption of 1–2, 3–4, and ≥5 cups of coffee compared to non-consumption, respectively [173].”
From Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update (2022) · cites this paper as [173]
In the citing paper
“On the opposite side, a meta-analysis of one cohort study in 309,797 never-smoker women with a 13.7-year follow-up did not find any statistically significant association between coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk with a summary RR = 1.00 (95% CI = 0.86–1.17) for ≥2 versus zero cups of coffee/day.”
From Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update (2022) · cites this paper as [173]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1056/NEJM198103123041102 · DOI · Paper page
- Mack TM, 1986, Pancreas cancer and smoking, beverage consumption, and past medical history, J Natl Cancer Inst, 76, 49
- 10.1002/ijc.2910430105 · DOI
- 10.1093/annonc/mdr541 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01694753 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10552-010-9582-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.029 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.27773 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/bjc.2015.235 · DOI
- 10.3945/ajcn.113.081836 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwp134 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/jech.54.9.650 · DOI
- 10.1093/annonc/mdr331 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyy065 · DOI
- 10.1079/PHN2004676 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199407143310203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70337-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Harnack LJ, 1997, Smoking, alcohol, coffee, and tea intake and incidence of cancer of the exocrine pancreas: the Iowa women's health study, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 6, 1081
- Michaud DS, 2001, Coffee and alcohol consumption and the risk of pancreatic cancer in two prospective United States cohorts, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 10, 429
- 10.1023/A:1023700216945 · DOI
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0201 · DOI
- 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00508-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90123-6 · DOI
Cited by
PD-L1 degradation pathway and immunotherapy for cancer
Gou, Q., Dong, C., Xu, H., Khan, B., Jin, J., Liu, Q., Shi, J., & Hou, Y. (2020) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-020-03140-2 · Cited by 322
Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update
Nehlig, A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14020399 · Cited by 158
Coffee Consumption by Type and Risk of Digestive Cancer: A Large Prospective Cohort Study
Tran, K. T., Coleman, H. G., McMenamin, Ú. C., & Cardwell, C. R. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0465-y · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, C. D., Kuan, A. S., Reeves, G. K., Green, J., Floud, S., Beral, V., Yang, T. O., & Collaborators, O. B. O. T. M. W. S.
- Affiliations
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London NW3 2QG United Kingdom
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit Nuffield Department of Population Health Oxford OX3 7LF United Kingdom
- Venue
- International Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-28
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1484-1492
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
- 1097-0215
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.